Chromium Code Reviews| Index: net/socket/ssl_client_socket_nss.cc |
| diff --git a/net/socket/ssl_client_socket_nss.cc b/net/socket/ssl_client_socket_nss.cc |
| index 2830fd174ee3fbac71fa9121a4f65765c0b67a0d..6d80fecb2c809d96981d2f804fd8422f6f728c9e 100644 |
| --- a/net/socket/ssl_client_socket_nss.cc |
| +++ b/net/socket/ssl_client_socket_nss.cc |
| @@ -3125,18 +3125,18 @@ void SSLClientSocketNSS::VerifyCT() { |
| // TODO(ekasper): wipe stapled_ocsp_response and sct_list_from_tls_extension |
| // from the state after verification is complete, to conserve memory. |
| - if (policy_enforcer_ && |
| - (server_cert_verify_result_.cert_status & CERT_STATUS_IS_EV)) { |
| + if (policy_enforcer_) { |
| scoped_refptr<ct::EVCertsWhitelist> ev_whitelist = |
| SSLConfigService::GetEVCertsWhitelist(); |
| if (!policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy( |
|
Ryan Sleevi
2016/01/12 04:39:12
Seems like this method should be renamed?
|
| server_cert_verify_result_.verified_cert.get(), ev_whitelist.get(), |
| ct_verify_result_, net_log_)) { |
| // TODO(eranm): Log via the BoundNetLog, see crbug.com/437766 |
| - VLOG(1) << "EV certificate for " |
| - << server_cert_verify_result_.verified_cert->subject() |
| - .GetDisplayName() |
| - << " does not conform to CT policy, removing EV status."; |
| + VLOG(1) |
| + << "Certificate for " |
| + << server_cert_verify_result_.verified_cert->subject() |
| + .GetDisplayName() |
| + << " does not conform to CT policy, removing EV status if present."; |
| server_cert_verify_result_.cert_status |= |
| CERT_STATUS_CT_COMPLIANCE_FAILED; |
| server_cert_verify_result_.cert_status &= ~CERT_STATUS_IS_EV; |