Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(213)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Unified Diff: net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc

Issue 1578993003: Add Expect CT policy that gets checked on all certs (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: tweaks Created 4 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer.cc ('K') | « net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer.cc ('k') | net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
diff --git a/net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc b/net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
index 435525293337ea7569e52ccf35e881580b1123b1..3f0eab56e479ce4d6f4bc5fb3a7c8f7349bb9fe6 100644
--- a/net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
+++ b/net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
@@ -123,15 +123,14 @@ class CTPolicyEnforcerTest : public ::testing::Test {
for (size_t i = 0; i < required_scts - 1; ++i) {
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED,
1, std::vector<std::string>(), false, &result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- cert.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()))
+ EXPECT_FALSE(
+ policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(cert.get(), result))
<< " for: " << (end - start).InDays() << " and " << required_scts
<< " scts=" << result.verified_scts.size() << " i=" << i;
}
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
std::vector<std::string>(), false, &result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- cert.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()))
+ EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(cert.get(), result))
<< " for: " << (end - start).InDays() << " and " << required_scts
<< " scts=" << result.verified_scts.size();
}
@@ -148,8 +147,7 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest,
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithRepeatedLogID(google_log_id_, 2, true, &result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest,
@@ -157,16 +155,14 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest,
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithRepeatedLogID(non_google_log_id_, 2, true, &result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyIfSCTBeforeEnforcementDate) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithRepeatedLogID(non_google_log_id_, 2, false, &result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), nullptr,
- result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithNonEmbeddedSCTs) {
@@ -174,8 +170,7 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithNonEmbeddedSCTs) {
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(
ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_FROM_TLS_EXTENSION, 2, &result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), nullptr,
- result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithEmbeddedSCTs) {
@@ -184,8 +179,7 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithEmbeddedSCTs) {
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 5,
&result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), nullptr,
- result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, DoesNotConformToCTEVPolicyNotEnoughSCTs) {
@@ -198,14 +192,17 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, DoesNotConformToCTEVPolicyNotEnoughSCTs) {
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
&result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), non_including_whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), CERT_STATUS_CT_COMPLIANCE_FAILED | CERT_STATUS_IS_EV,
+ non_including_whitelist.get(), BoundNetLog()));
// ... but should be OK if whitelisted.
scoped_refptr<ct::EVCertsWhitelist> whitelist(
new DummyEVCertsWhitelist(true, true));
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), CERT_STATUS_CT_COMPLIANCE_FAILED | CERT_STATUS_IS_EV,
+ whitelist.get(), BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, DoesNotConformToPolicyInvalidDates) {
@@ -214,13 +211,14 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, DoesNotConformToPolicyInvalidDates) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 5,
&result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- no_valid_dates_cert.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(
+ no_valid_dates_cert.get(), result));
// ... but should be OK if whitelisted.
scoped_refptr<ct::EVCertsWhitelist> whitelist(
new DummyEVCertsWhitelist(true, true));
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), CERT_STATUS_CT_COMPLIANCE_FAILED | CERT_STATUS_IS_EV,
+ whitelist.get(), BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest,
@@ -230,34 +228,28 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest,
base::Time validity_start;
base::Time validity_end;
size_t scts_required;
- } kTestData[] = {{// Cert valid for 14 months, needs 2 SCTs.
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2016, 6, 0, 6, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- 2},
- {// Cert valid for exactly 15 months, needs 3 SCTs.
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2016, 6, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- 3},
- {// Cert valid for over 15 months, needs 3 SCTs.
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2016, 6, 0, 27, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- 3},
- {// Cert valid for exactly 27 months, needs 3 SCTs.
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2017, 6, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- 3},
- {// Cert valid for over 27 months, needs 4 SCTs.
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2017, 6, 0, 28, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- 4},
- {// Cert valid for exactly 39 months, needs 4 SCTs.
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2018, 6, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- 4},
- {// Cert valid for over 39 months, needs 5 SCTs.
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2018, 6, 0, 27, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
- 5}};
+ } kTestData[] = {
+ {// Cert valid for 14 months, needs 2 SCTs.
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2016, 6, 0, 6, 11, 25, 0, 0}), 2},
+ {// Cert valid for exactly 15 months, needs 3 SCTs.
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2016, 6, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}), 3},
+ {// Cert valid for over 15 months, needs 3 SCTs.
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2016, 6, 0, 27, 11, 25, 0, 0}), 3},
+ {// Cert valid for exactly 27 months, needs 3 SCTs.
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2017, 6, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}), 3},
+ {// Cert valid for over 27 months, needs 4 SCTs.
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2017, 6, 0, 28, 11, 25, 0, 0}), 4},
+ {// Cert valid for exactly 39 months, needs 4 SCTs.
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2018, 6, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}), 4},
+ {// Cert valid for over 39 months, needs 5 SCTs.
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2015, 3, 0, 25, 11, 25, 0, 0}),
+ base::Time::FromUTCExploded({2018, 6, 0, 27, 11, 25, 0, 0}), 5}};
for (size_t i = 0; i < arraysize(kTestData); ++i) {
SCOPED_TRACE(i);
@@ -274,8 +266,10 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToPolicyByEVWhitelistPresence) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
&result);
- EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), CERT_STATUS_CT_COMPLIANCE_FAILED | CERT_STATUS_IS_EV,
+ whitelist.get(), BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, IgnoresInvalidEVWhitelist) {
@@ -285,16 +279,20 @@ TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, IgnoresInvalidEVWhitelist) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
&result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), whitelist.get(), result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), CERT_STATUS_CT_COMPLIANCE_FAILED | CERT_STATUS_IS_EV,
+ whitelist.get(), BoundNetLog()));
}
TEST_F(CTPolicyEnforcerTest, IgnoresNullEVWhitelist) {
ct::CTVerifyResult result;
FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1,
&result);
- EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(
- chain_.get(), nullptr, result, BoundNetLog()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCertPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToEVPolicy(
+ chain_.get(), CERT_STATUS_CT_COMPLIANCE_FAILED | CERT_STATUS_IS_EV,
+ nullptr, BoundNetLog()));
}
} // namespace
« net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer.cc ('K') | « net/cert/ct_policy_enforcer.cc ('k') | net/quic/crypto/proof_verifier_chromium.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698