tools/origin_trials/third_party/ed25519/README.chromium - Issue 1578793002: Add experimental framework token generation tool

Side by Side Diff

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Side by Side Diff: tools/origin_trials/third_party/ed25519/README.chromium

Issue 1578793002: Add experimental framework token generation tool (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master

Patch Set: Move third_party code; fix bug from last patch's rename Created 4 years, 11 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View unified diff | Download patch

OLD	NEW
(Empty)
	1 Name: Ed25519: high-speed high-security signatures

	2 Short Name: Ed25519

	3 URL: http://ed25519.cr.yp.to/software.html

	4 Version: 0

	5 License: Public Domain

	6 License File: NOT_SHIPPED

	7 Security Critical: no
	palmer 2016/02/11 22:03:20 I think I agree, but it looks a bit strange. :) Ca I think I agree, but it looks a bit strange. :) Can you add a comment about why we don't consider it security-critical, even though it's about cryptographic signatures? And, if this library gets used for new purposes, how that No could turn into a Yes. iclelland 2016/02/12 22:00:50 I'll do that, certainly. Is there a standard for f Show quoted text On 2016/02/11 22:03:20, palmer wrote: > I think I agree, but it looks a bit strange. :) Can you add a comment about why > we don't consider it security-critical, even though it's about cryptographic > signatures? And, if this library gets used for new purposes, how that No could > turn into a Yes. I'll do that, certainly. Is there a standard for free-form comments in this file? iclelland 2016/02/16 20:25:12 Done. Show quoted text On 2016/02/11 22:03:20, palmer wrote: > I think I agree, but it looks a bit strange. :) Can you add a comment about why > we don't consider it security-critical, even though it's about cryptographic > signatures? And, if this library gets used for new purposes, how that No could > turn into a Yes. Done.
	8

	9 Description:

	10 This package is used by the command-line utilities in tools/origin_trials to

	11 sign tokens for experimental feature usage, and to verify the signatures on

	12 those tokens.

	13

	14 Local Modifications:

	15 None.

OLD	NEW

« tools/origin_trials/generate_token.py ('K') | « tools/origin_trials/third_party/ed25519/OWNERS ('k') | tools/origin_trials/third_party/ed25519/__init__.py » ('j') | no next file with comments »