Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1371)

Unified Diff: content/browser/cache_storage/cache_storage_cache.cc

Issue 1578363009: CacheStorage: Add ignoreSearch option to cache.matchAll(). (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/cache_storage/cache_storage_cache.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/cache_storage/cache_storage_cache.cc b/content/browser/cache_storage/cache_storage_cache.cc
index 2fc74110e7e16906675d343cd560a44dea2dfb6d..6dbe01d8d44de91dbbdd9e924071c79b90c9066a 100644
--- a/content/browser/cache_storage/cache_storage_cache.cc
+++ b/content/browser/cache_storage/cache_storage_cache.cc
@@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ bool VaryMatches(const ServiceWorkerHeaderMap& request,
return true;
}
+bool URLMatchWithoutQuery(const GURL& request_url, const GURL& key) {
+ return request_url.scheme() == key.scheme() &&
+ request_url.host() == key.host() && request_url.path() == key.path();
nhiroki 2016/01/18 04:29:58 This match algorithm could be insufficient, for ex
zino 2016/01/19 13:46:38 I modified it but I couldn't write a test for it.
nhiroki 2016/01/20 08:56:02 Yes, the constructor rejects such a URL. A Reques
+}
+
void ReadMetadata(disk_cache::Entry* entry, const MetadataCallback& callback) {
DCHECK(entry);
@@ -210,12 +215,16 @@ struct CacheStorageCache::OpenAllEntriesContext {
// The state needed to pass between CacheStorageCache::MatchAll callbacks.
struct CacheStorageCache::MatchAllContext {
- explicit MatchAllContext(const CacheStorageCache::ResponsesCallback& callback)
- : original_callback(callback),
+ explicit MatchAllContext(scoped_ptr<ServiceWorkerFetchRequest> request,
nhiroki 2016/01/18 04:29:58 Remove "explicit"
zino 2016/01/19 13:46:38 Done.
+ const CacheStorageCache::ResponsesCallback& callback)
nhiroki 2016/01/18 04:29:58 "CacheStorageCache::" prefix is not necessary.
zino 2016/01/19 13:46:38 Done.
+ : request(std::move(request)),
+ original_callback(callback),
out_responses(new Responses),
out_blob_data_handles(new BlobDataHandles) {}
~MatchAllContext() {}
+ scoped_ptr<ServiceWorkerFetchRequest> request;
+
// The callback passed to the MatchAll() function.
ResponsesCallback original_callback;
@@ -328,6 +337,11 @@ void CacheStorageCache::Match(scoped_ptr<ServiceWorkerFetchRequest> request,
}
void CacheStorageCache::MatchAll(const ResponsesCallback& callback) {
nhiroki 2016/01/18 04:29:59 Could you remove this indirection and directly cal
zino 2016/01/19 13:46:38 Done.
+ MatchAll(nullptr, callback);
+}
+
+void CacheStorageCache::MatchAll(scoped_ptr<ServiceWorkerFetchRequest> request,
+ const ResponsesCallback& callback) {
if (!LazyInitialize()) {
callback.Run(CACHE_STORAGE_ERROR_STORAGE, scoped_ptr<Responses>(),
scoped_ptr<BlobDataHandles>());
@@ -337,9 +351,9 @@ void CacheStorageCache::MatchAll(const ResponsesCallback& callback) {
ResponsesCallback pending_callback =
base::Bind(&CacheStorageCache::PendingResponsesCallback,
weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(), callback);
- scheduler_->ScheduleOperation(base::Bind(&CacheStorageCache::MatchAllImpl,
- weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
- pending_callback));
+ scheduler_->ScheduleOperation(base::Bind(
+ &CacheStorageCache::MatchAllImpl, weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
+ base::Passed(std::move(request)), pending_callback));
}
void CacheStorageCache::BatchOperation(
@@ -638,7 +652,9 @@ void CacheStorageCache::MatchDidReadMetadata(
std::move(blob_data_handle));
}
-void CacheStorageCache::MatchAllImpl(const ResponsesCallback& callback) {
+void CacheStorageCache::MatchAllImpl(
+ scoped_ptr<ServiceWorkerFetchRequest> request,
+ const ResponsesCallback& callback) {
DCHECK_NE(BACKEND_UNINITIALIZED, backend_state_);
if (backend_state_ != BACKEND_OPEN) {
callback.Run(CACHE_STORAGE_ERROR_STORAGE, scoped_ptr<Responses>(),
@@ -647,10 +663,12 @@ void CacheStorageCache::MatchAllImpl(const ResponsesCallback& callback) {
}
OpenAllEntries(base::Bind(&CacheStorageCache::MatchAllDidOpenAllEntries,
- weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(), callback));
+ weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
+ base::Passed(std::move(request)), callback));
}
void CacheStorageCache::MatchAllDidOpenAllEntries(
+ scoped_ptr<ServiceWorkerFetchRequest> request,
const ResponsesCallback& callback,
scoped_ptr<OpenAllEntriesContext> entries_context,
CacheStorageError error) {
@@ -659,7 +677,8 @@ void CacheStorageCache::MatchAllDidOpenAllEntries(
return;
}
- scoped_ptr<MatchAllContext> context(new MatchAllContext(callback));
+ scoped_ptr<MatchAllContext> context(
+ new MatchAllContext(std::move(request), callback));
context->entries_context.swap(entries_context);
Entries::iterator iter = context->entries_context->entries.begin();
MatchAllProcessNextEntry(std::move(context), iter);
@@ -676,9 +695,16 @@ void CacheStorageCache::MatchAllProcessNextEntry(
return;
}
- ReadMetadata(*iter, base::Bind(&CacheStorageCache::MatchAllDidReadMetadata,
- weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
- base::Passed(std::move(context)), iter));
+ disk_cache::Entry* entry(*iter);
+ if (!context->request ||
+ URLMatchWithoutQuery(context->request->url, GURL(entry->GetKey()))) {
nhiroki 2016/01/18 04:29:59 This combined condition is a bit confusing to me.
zino 2016/01/19 13:46:38 Done.
+ ReadMetadata(*iter, base::Bind(&CacheStorageCache::MatchAllDidReadMetadata,
+ weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
+ base::Passed(std::move(context)), iter));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ MatchAllProcessNextEntry(std::move(context), iter + 1);
}
void CacheStorageCache::MatchAllDidReadMetadata(

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698