Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(257)

Issue 1576453002: fix opacity check in SkBitmapDevice::Create (Closed)

Created:
4 years, 11 months ago by lsalzman1
Modified:
4 years, 11 months ago
Reviewers:
mtklein, reed1
CC:
reviews_skia.org
Base URL:
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia@master
Target Ref:
refs/heads/master
Project:
skia
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+1 line, -1 line) Patch
M src/core/SkBitmapDevice.cpp View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 12 (6 generated)
lsalzman1
This ensures the correct SkImageInfo is used to check for opacity in SkBitmapDevice::Create().
4 years, 11 months ago (2016-01-08 18:57:46 UTC) #4
mtklein
lgtm
4 years, 11 months ago (2016-01-08 19:01:42 UTC) #6
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1576453002/1 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1576453002/1
4 years, 11 months ago (2016-01-08 19:01:56 UTC) #7
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04d975ac34c97d4869f819d2ad7c9fda47c198af
4 years, 11 months ago (2016-01-08 19:20:16 UTC) #9
reed1
yikes, but a stupid bug (mine). Good catch.
4 years, 11 months ago (2016-01-08 19:38:05 UTC) #11
mtklein
4 years, 11 months ago (2016-01-08 19:40:59 UTC) #12
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2016/01/08 19:38:05, reed1 wrote:
> yikes, but a stupid bug (mine). Good catch.

Don't feel bad.  It was my stupid bug.  When you wrote bitmap.info().isOpaque()
it was correct (as would have info.isOpaque() been too).

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698