Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(112)

Issue 15562008: Recording array buffer views. (Closed)

Created:
7 years, 7 months ago by Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
Modified:
7 years, 6 months ago
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Recording array buffer views. R=hpayer@chromium.org BUG= Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=15000

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 2 : True weak pointers #

Patch Set 3 : Rebased #

Patch Set 4 : Tests etc. #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 5 : Added some more tests #

Total comments: 16

Patch Set 6 : CR feedback #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+642 lines, -12 lines) Patch
M include/v8.h View 1 2 3 1 chunk +8 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/api.cc View 1 2 3 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/bootstrapper.cc View 1 2 3 4 5 1 chunk +1 line, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M src/heap.h View 1 2 3 3 chunks +11 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/heap.cc View 1 2 3 5 chunks +114 lines, -5 lines 0 comments Download
M src/objects.h View 1 2 3 4 5 4 chunks +17 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M src/objects-inl.h View 1 2 3 1 chunk +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/objects-printer.cc View 1 2 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/objects-visiting.h View 1 3 chunks +7 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/objects-visiting.cc View 1 2 3 4 5 2 chunks +6 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M src/objects-visiting-inl.h View 1 2 3 4 5 4 chunks +80 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/runtime.cc View 1 2 3 2 chunks +6 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M test/cctest/cctest.gyp View 1 2 3 1 chunk +2 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
A test/cctest/test-weaktypedarrays.cc View 1 2 3 4 5 1 chunk +380 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 13 (0 generated)
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
Hannes/Michael, this is work in progress - please check if the approach looks good to ...
7 years, 7 months ago (2013-05-21 13:54:56 UTC) #1
Michael Starzinger
From a high-level perspective this approach should work. So it is heading into the right ...
7 years, 7 months ago (2013-05-21 15:48:04 UTC) #2
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
On second thoughts, I think that most of this is not entirely correct. The better ...
7 years, 7 months ago (2013-05-21 21:25:52 UTC) #3
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
Please take another look. This is incomplete: - no tests - no actual API for ...
7 years, 7 months ago (2013-05-22 15:39:49 UTC) #4
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
Hannes/Michael, please take a look. This does not have actual implementation of neutering API yet ...
7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-04 15:15:52 UTC) #5
Hannes Payer (out of office)
First rounds of comments. The implementation looks good. Can we make the tests more complicated, ...
7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-06 09:33:32 UTC) #6
Michael Starzinger
Just a bunch of nits. https://codereview.chromium.org/15562008/diff/20001/src/objects-visiting-inl.h File src/objects-visiting-inl.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/15562008/diff/20001/src/objects-visiting-inl.h#newcode125 src/objects-visiting-inl.h:125: nit: Add a second ...
7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-06 09:53:18 UTC) #7
Michael Starzinger
One high-level comment: I don't think JSTypedArray or JSArrayBuffer objects can have in-object properties. So ...
7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-06 12:03:11 UTC) #8
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
Thanks a lot for review - please take another look. https://codereview.chromium.org/15562008/diff/20001/src/objects-visiting-inl.h File src/objects-visiting-inl.h (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/15562008/diff/20001/src/objects-visiting-inl.h#newcode125 ...
7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-06 13:18:34 UTC) #9
Hannes Payer (out of office)
lgtm
7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-07 10:43:50 UTC) #10
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
Committed patchset #6 manually as r15000 (presubmit successful).
7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-07 10:52:23 UTC) #11
Michael Starzinger
LGTM from my end as well, even though you didn't seem to bother. :)
7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-07 11:02:57 UTC) #12
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
7 years, 6 months ago (2013-06-07 11:12:58 UTC) #13
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2013/06/07 11:02:57, Michael Starzinger wrote:
> LGTM from my end as well, even though you didn't seem to bother. :)

Sorry about, I treated R= line as an 'or' not as 'and'. Rest assured, I do care
about your opinion!
Next time I'll designate one person as an R= and put others on CC:.

Thanks,
Dmitry

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698