Regenerate the test certificates.

net/cert/x509_certificate_unittest.cc

 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 // found in the LICENSE file.
 
 #include "net/cert/x509_certificate.h"
 
 #include <stdint.h>
 
 #include "base/files/file_path.h"
 #include "base/memory/scoped_ptr.h"
@@ skipping 486 matching lines @@
   static const uint8_t kIPv6Address[] = {
       0xFE, 0x80, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01
   };
   ASSERT_EQ(arraysize(kIPv6Address), ip_addresses[1].size());
   EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(ip_addresses[1].data(), kIPv6Address,
                       arraysize(kIPv6Address)));
 
   // Ensure the subjectAltName dirName has not influenced the handling of
   // the subject commonName.
-  EXPECT_EQ("127.0.0.1", san_cert->subject().common_name);
+  EXPECT_EQ("localhost", san_cert->subject().common_name);

[Ryan Hamilton, 2016/01/04 18:34:06]

If you look at the cert in question, it appears to have changed the SAN from
127.0.0.1 to localhost. I'm not sure if changing this test is OK, or if I should
change the cert script?

 }
 
 TEST(X509CertificateTest, ExtractSPKIFromDERCert) {
   base::FilePath certs_dir = GetTestCertsDirectory();
   scoped_refptr<X509Certificate> cert =
       ImportCertFromFile(certs_dir, "nist.der");
   ASSERT_NE(static_cast<X509Certificate*>(NULL), cert.get());
 
   std::string derBytes;
   EXPECT_TRUE(X509Certificate::GetDEREncoded(cert->os_cert_handle(),
@@ skipping 688 matching lines @@
                                     &actual_type);
 
   EXPECT_EQ(data.expected_bits, actual_bits);
   EXPECT_EQ(data.expected_type, actual_type);
 }
 
 INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(, X509CertificatePublicKeyInfoTest,
                         testing::ValuesIn(kPublicKeyInfoTestData));
 
 }  // namespace net