[Cronet] Get Cronet performance test running again

components/cronet/android/test/cronet_javatest_jni.cc

Index: components/cronet/android/test/cronet_javatest_jni.cc
diff --git a/components/cronet/android/test/cronet_javatest_jni.cc b/components/cronet/android/test/cronet_javatest_jni.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8619ffb4761d53de4ab890dffb80666f6d9bfc6e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/components/cronet/android/test/cronet_javatest_jni.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include <jni.h>
+
+#include "base/android/base_jni_registrar.h"
+#include "base/android/jni_android.h"
+#include "base/android/jni_registrar.h"
+#include "components/cronet/android/cronet_library_loader.h"
+#include "cronet_url_request_context_config_test.h"
+
+extern "C" jint JNI_OnLoad(JavaVM* vm, void* reserved) {
+  base::android::InitVM(vm);
+  static const base::android::RegistrationMethod
+      sCronetTestsRegisteredMethods[] = {

[xunjieli, 2015/12/17 21:42:23]

Should this be in the anonymous namespace? (like the other two existing *_jni.cc
files)

[pauljensen, 2015/12/18 14:26:08]

I don't think so.  Coding style guide says "Place a function's variables in the
narrowest scope possible" thus I think it's preferable to be function scoped
rather than file scoped.

+          {"CronetUrlRequestContextConfigTest",
+           cronet::RegisterCronetUrlRequestContextConfigTest},
+      };
+  if (!base::android::RegisterNativeMethods(
+          base::android::AttachCurrentThread(), sCronetTestsRegisteredMethods,
+          arraysize(sCronetTestsRegisteredMethods))) {
+    return -1;
+  }
+  return JNI_VERSION_1_6;
+}