Gracefully handle pubspecs with dependencies using unknown sources.

sdk/lib/_internal/pub/lib/src/lock_file.dart

Index: sdk/lib/_internal/pub/lib/src/lock_file.dart
diff --git a/sdk/lib/_internal/pub/lib/src/lock_file.dart b/sdk/lib/_internal/pub/lib/src/lock_file.dart
index 1e85a4d0e37f080c2bae62b9d59ccccc66dc06f1..e9799be3002115301dc0e25af7480c5e4d297a55 100644
--- a/sdk/lib/_internal/pub/lib/src/lock_file.dart
+++ b/sdk/lib/_internal/pub/lib/src/lock_file.dart
@@ -62,17 +62,20 @@ class LockFile {
           throw new FormatException(
               'Could not find a source named $sourceName.');
         }
-        var source = sources[sourceName];
 
-        // Parse the description.
         if (!spec.containsKey('description')) {
           throw new FormatException('Package $name is missing a description.');
         }
         var description = spec['description'];
-        description = source.parseDescription(filePath, description,
-            fromLockFile: true);
 
-        var id = new PackageId(name, source, version, description);
+        // Parse the description if we know the source.
+        if (sources.contains(sourceName)) {

[nweiz, 2013/05/17 23:55:55]

This is already checked on l61. Did you mean to remove the previous check? Are
you missing a test that would catch this?

[Bob Nystrom, 2013/05/20 20:06:00]

Removed the previous check and added a test that catches this.

+          var source = sources[sourceName];
+          description = source.parseDescription(filePath, description,
+              fromLockFile: true);
+        }
+
+        var id = new PackageId(name, sourceName, version, description);
 
         // Validate the name.
         if (name != id.name) {
@@ -97,7 +100,7 @@ class LockFile {
     sortedKeys.forEach((name) {
       packagesObj[name] = {
         'version': packages[name].version.toString(),
-        'source': packages[name].source.name,
+        'source': packages[name].source,
         'description': packages[name].description
       };
     });