Chromium Code Reviews| Index: chrome/browser/spellchecker/feedback_sender_unittest.cc |
| diff --git a/chrome/browser/spellchecker/feedback_sender_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/spellchecker/feedback_sender_unittest.cc |
| index 23eaf5af88e0ba71b42770a6466da1ba9c1067a5..69e91b96d12cd87d5a4b4ff2a520b12c36a8e611 100644 |
| --- a/chrome/browser/spellchecker/feedback_sender_unittest.cc |
| +++ b/chrome/browser/spellchecker/feedback_sender_unittest.cc |
| @@ -433,4 +433,19 @@ TEST_F(FeedbackSenderTest, FeedbackAPI) { |
| << "\nActual data: " << actual_data; |
| } |
| +// Duplicate spellcheck results should be matched to the existing markers. |
| +TEST_F(FeedbackSenderTest, MatchDupliateResultsWithExistingMarkers) { |
|
groby-ooo-7-16
2013/05/23 19:10:50
Why a new test - was there new functionality?
please use gerrit instead
2013/05/23 19:50:47
No new functionality. I was increasing test covera
|
| + uint32 hash = AddPendingFeedback(); |
| + std::vector<SpellCheckResult> results(1, SpellCheckResult( |
| + SpellCheckResult::SPELLING, |
| + kMisspellingStart + 10, |
| + kMisspellingLength, |
| + ASCIIToUTF16("Hello"))); |
| + std::vector<SpellCheckMarker> markers(1, SpellCheckMarker( |
| + hash, results[0].location)); |
| + EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<uint32>(0), results[0].hash); |
| + feedback_.OnSpellcheckResults(&results, kRendererProcessId, kText, markers); |
| + EXPECT_EQ(hash, results[0].hash); |
| +} |
| + |
| } // namespace spellcheck |