Delete the ViewManager and WindowManager services.

mojo/services/window_manager/interfaces/window_manager_internal.mojom

-// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
-// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
-// found in the LICENSE file.
-
-[DartPackage="mojo_services"]
-module mojo;
-
-import "geometry/interfaces/geometry.mojom";
-import "input_events/interfaces/input_events.mojom";
-
-// WindowManagerInternal is an interface provided by the WindowManager
-// exclusively to the ViewManager.
-[ServiceName="mojo::WindowManagerInternal"]
-interface WindowManagerInternal {
-  // Creates a connection to the WindowManager specifically for a connection to
-  // the ViewManager. |connection_id| is the id of the connection to the
-  // ViewManager. See view_manager.mojom for details on the id.
-  CreateWindowManagerForViewManagerClient(
-      uint16 connection_id,
-      handle<message_pipe> window_manager_pipe);
-
-  SetViewManagerClient(handle<message_pipe> view_manager_client_request);
-};
-
-// WindowManagerInternalClient is an interface provide by the ViewManager
-// exclusively to the WindowManager. It provides functionality only available
-// to the WindowManager.
-[ServiceName="mojo::WindowManagerInternalClient"]
-interface WindowManagerInternalClient {
-  // Dispatches the specified input event to the specified view.
-  DispatchInputEventToView(uint32 view_id, mojo.Event event);
-
-  // Sets the native viewport size.
-  SetViewportSize(mojo.Size size);
-
-  // Clones the tree rooted at |view_id|. When the animation completes the clone
-  // is destroyed.
-  // TODO(sky): add actual animation.
-  // TODO(sky): I think this only makes sense when destroying (view is
-  // already visible), should it be named to indicate this?
-  CloneAndAnimate(uint32 view_id);
-};