Remove checkForChildrenAdjacentRuleChanges.

third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp

Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp
index 380860b6f13af335379ef04f5c2677be1af494f2..5522d9af9eeac4b34968ccb81e3ef7c61ef79606 100644
--- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp
@@ -1305,9 +1305,6 @@ void ContainerNode::recalcChildStyle(StyleRecalcChange change)
     ASSERT(change >= UpdatePseudoElements || childNeedsStyleRecalc());
     ASSERT(!needsStyleRecalc());
 
-    if (change < Force && hasRareData() && childNeedsStyleRecalc())
-        checkForChildrenAdjacentRuleChanges();
-
     // This loop is deliberately backwards because we use insertBefore in the layout tree, and want to avoid
     // a potentially n^2 loop to find the insertion point while resolving style. Having us start from the last
     // child and work our way back means in the common case, we'll find the insertion point in O(1) time.
@@ -1330,33 +1327,6 @@ void ContainerNode::recalcChildStyle(StyleRecalcChange change)
     }
 }
 
-void ContainerNode::checkForChildrenAdjacentRuleChanges()
-{
-    bool hasDirectAdjacentRules = childrenAffectedByDirectAdjacentRules();
-    bool hasIndirectAdjacentRules = childrenAffectedByIndirectAdjacentRules();
-
-    if (!hasDirectAdjacentRules && !hasIndirectAdjacentRules)
-        return;
-
-    unsigned forceCheckOfNextElementCount = 0;
-    bool forceCheckOfAnyElementSibling = false;
-    Document& document = this->document();
-
-    for (Element* child = ElementTraversal::firstChild(*this); child; child = ElementTraversal::nextSibling(*child)) {
-        bool childRulesChanged = child->needsStyleRecalc() && child->styleChangeType() >= SubtreeStyleChange;
-
-        if (forceCheckOfNextElementCount || forceCheckOfAnyElementSibling)
-            child->setNeedsStyleRecalc(SubtreeStyleChange, StyleChangeReasonForTracing::create(StyleChangeReason::SiblingSelector));
-
-        if (childRulesChanged && hasDirectAdjacentRules)
-            forceCheckOfNextElementCount = document.styleEngine().maxDirectAdjacentSelectors();
-        else if (forceCheckOfNextElementCount)
-            --forceCheckOfNextElementCount;
-
-        forceCheckOfAnyElementSibling = forceCheckOfAnyElementSibling || (childRulesChanged && hasIndirectAdjacentRules);
-    }
-}
-
 void ContainerNode::checkForSiblingStyleChanges(SiblingCheckType changeType, Node* nodeBeforeChange, Node* nodeAfterChange)
 {
     if (!inActiveDocument() || document().hasPendingForcedStyleRecalc() || styleChangeType() >= SubtreeStyleChange)
@@ -1422,7 +1392,8 @@ void ContainerNode::checkForSiblingStyleChanges(SiblingCheckType changeType, Nod
     // The + selector. We need to invalidate the first element following the change. It is the only possible element
     // that could be affected by this DOM change.
     if (childrenAffectedByDirectAdjacentRules() && nodeAfterChange) {
-        if (Element* elementAfterChange = nodeAfterChange->isElementNode() ? toElement(nodeAfterChange) : ElementTraversal::nextSibling(*nodeAfterChange))
+        Element* elementAfterChange = nodeAfterChange->isElementNode() ? toElement(nodeAfterChange) : ElementTraversal::nextSibling(*nodeAfterChange);
+        for (unsigned i = document().styleEngine().maxDirectAdjacentSelectors(); i && elementAfterChange; --i, elementAfterChange = ElementTraversal::nextSibling(*elementAfterChange))
             elementAfterChange->setNeedsStyleRecalc(SubtreeStyleChange, StyleChangeReasonForTracing::create(StyleChangeReason::SiblingSelector));
     }
 }