Added a PolicyDomainDescriptor.

chrome/browser/chromeos/extensions/networking_private_apitest.cc

Index: chrome/browser/chromeos/extensions/networking_private_apitest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/chromeos/extensions/networking_private_apitest.cc b/chrome/browser/chromeos/extensions/networking_private_apitest.cc
index 71cff2f96a033ab0e58e6f7afc1ee450d35945e7..e2856042b98c98ca79f78691f4fea080e57becb9 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/chromeos/extensions/networking_private_apitest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/chromeos/extensions/networking_private_apitest.cc
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ class ExtensionNetworkingPrivateApiTest : public ExtensionApiTest {
   virtual void SetUpInProcessBrowserTestFixture() OVERRIDE {
     EXPECT_CALL(provider_, IsInitializationComplete(_))
         .WillRepeatedly(Return(true));
-    EXPECT_CALL(provider_, RegisterPolicyDomain(_, _)).Times(AnyNumber());
+    EXPECT_CALL(provider_, RegisterPolicyDomain(_)).Times(AnyNumber());

[Mattias Nissler (ping if slow), 2013/05/15 10:24:06]

It seems like there are a large number of tests that use
MockConfigurationPolicyProvider but actually are not interested in tracking call
expectations. I guess it makes sense to have another mock implementation lacking
the gmock bits. WDYT? If you agree, can you file a bug?

[Joao da Silva, 2013/05/19 13:17:55]

Agreed, filed http://crbug.com/242087 and left a TODO in
mock_configuration_policy_provider.h.

     policy::BrowserPolicyConnector::SetPolicyProviderForTesting(&provider_);
 
     ExtensionApiTest::SetUpInProcessBrowserTestFixture();