win: Fix some warnings reported by /analyze

win: Fix some warnings reported by /analyze

Reported by brucedawson@chromium.org.

R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:427616
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/crashpad/crashpad/+/894a06070e31e5f8c638af674401d4528d5fdffa

[Mark Mentovai, 2015-12-02 21:46:33]

LGTM  otherwise

https://codereview.chromium.org/1489293004/diff/1/util/win/process_info.cc
File util/win/process_info.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1489293004/diff/1/util/win/process_info.cc#ne...
util/win/process_info.cc:227: LOG(ERROR) << base::StringPrintf("peb address
0xllx out of range",
You lost the %.

[scottmg, 2015-12-02 21:51:57]

https://codereview.chromium.org/1489293004/diff/1/util/win/process_info.cc
File util/win/process_info.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/1489293004/diff/1/util/win/process_info.cc#ne...
util/win/process_info.cc:227: LOG(ERROR) << base::StringPrintf("peb address
0xllx out of range",
On 2015/12/02 21:46:33, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> You lost the %.

That would have been a poor "improvement"! Thanks.

[scottmg, 2015-12-02 21:52:09]

Description was changed from

==========
win: Fix some warnings reported by /analyze

Reported by brucedawson@chromium.org.

R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:427616
==========

to

==========
win: Fix some warnings reported by /analyze

Reported by brucedawson@chromium.org.

R=mark@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:427616

Committed:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/crashpad/crashpad/+/894a06070e31e5f8c638af6...
==========

[scottmg, 2015-12-02 21:52:10]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001) manually as
894a06070e31e5f8c638af674401d4528d5fdffa (presubmit successful).

[brucedawson, 2015-12-02 23:02:50]

On 2015/12/02 21:51:57, scottmg wrote:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/1489293004/diff/1/util/win/process_info.cc
> File util/win/process_info.cc (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/1489293004/diff/1/util/win/process_info.cc#ne...
> util/win/process_info.cc:227: LOG(ERROR) << base::StringPrintf("peb address
> 0xllx out of range",
> On 2015/12/02 21:46:33, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> > You lost the %.
> 
> That would have been a poor "improvement"! Thanks.

On the upside, the next /analyze build would have pointed out the problem...

lgtm.