IDL compiler: anonymous indexed property getters

Source/bindings/tests/idls/TestSpecialOperations.idl

Index: Source/bindings/tests/idls/TestSpecialOperations.idl
diff --git a/Source/bindings/tests/idls/TestInterfaceDocument.idl b/Source/bindings/tests/idls/TestSpecialOperations.idl
similarity index 93%
copy from Source/bindings/tests/idls/TestInterfaceDocument.idl
copy to Source/bindings/tests/idls/TestSpecialOperations.idl
index 2a687e871a44bace871a2d7b65243bbbdedc7339..81d544de47a6d68e45f71fbc892fe5116bf24043 100644
--- a/Source/bindings/tests/idls/TestInterfaceDocument.idl
+++ b/Source/bindings/tests/idls/TestSpecialOperations.idl
@@ -28,5 +28,6 @@
  * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
  */
 
-interface TestInterfaceDocument : Document {
+interface TestSpecialOperations {
+    [ImplementedAs=anonymousIndexedGetter] getter DOMString (unsigned long index);

[Nils Barth (inactive), 2014/01/27 06:29:48]

Currently we *require* [ImplementedAs=...]
for anonymous special operations.

Could we use a default name, to simplify the IDL files?
E.g., anonymousIndexedGetter, or more precisely
anonymousIndexedPropertyGetter ?

 };