Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1138)

Unified Diff: remoting/protocol/pairing_client_authenticator.cc

Issue 14793021: PairingAuthenticator implementation and plumbing. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Reviewer feedback. Created 7 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « remoting/protocol/pairing_client_authenticator.h ('k') | remoting/protocol/pairing_host_authenticator.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: remoting/protocol/pairing_client_authenticator.cc
diff --git a/remoting/protocol/pairing_client_authenticator.cc b/remoting/protocol/pairing_client_authenticator.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..929e62822d5215a5a739b6bb3adea3c05e372aca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/remoting/protocol/pairing_client_authenticator.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+// Copyright 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "remoting/protocol/pairing_client_authenticator.h"
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "remoting/base/constants.h"
+#include "remoting/base/rsa_key_pair.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/authentication_method.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/channel_authenticator.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/v2_authenticator.h"
+#include "third_party/libjingle/source/talk/xmllite/xmlelement.h"
+
+namespace remoting {
+namespace protocol {
+
+namespace {
+// These definitions must be kept in sync with pairing_host_authenticator.cc.
+const buzz::StaticQName kPairingInfoTag =
+ { kChromotingXmlNamespace, "pairing-info" };
+const buzz::StaticQName kClientIdAttribute =
+ { "", "client-id" };
+const buzz::StaticQName kPairingFailedTag =
+ { kChromotingXmlNamespace, "pairing-failed" };
+const buzz::StaticQName kPairingErrorAttribute =
+ { "", "error" };
+}
+
+PairingClientAuthenticator::PairingClientAuthenticator(
+ const std::string& client_id,
+ const std::string& paired_secret,
+ const FetchSecretCallback& fetch_pin_callback,
+ const std::string& authentication_tag)
+ : pairing_state_(MESSAGE_READY),
+ client_id_(client_id),
+ paired_secret_(paired_secret),
+ fetch_pin_callback_(fetch_pin_callback),
+ authentication_tag_(authentication_tag),
+ pairing_failed_(false),
+ weak_factory_(this) {
+}
+
+Authenticator::State PairingClientAuthenticator::state() const {
+ if (pairing_state_ == ACCEPTED || pairing_state_ == REJECTED) {
+ DCHECK(v2_authenticator_);
+ return v2_authenticator_->state();
+ } else {
+ return pairing_state_;
+ }
+}
+
+Authenticator::RejectionReason
+PairingClientAuthenticator::rejection_reason() const {
+ DCHECK(v2_authenticator_);
+ return v2_authenticator_->rejection_reason();
+}
+
+void PairingClientAuthenticator::ProcessMessage(
+ const buzz::XmlElement* message,
+ const base::Closure& resume_callback) {
+ DCHECK_EQ(state(), WAITING_MESSAGE);
+
+ if (v2_authenticator_) {
rmsousa 2013/05/16 20:11:02 This isn't really necessary, the else case below a
Jamie 2013/05/16 21:09:10 I realized the same thing when I was implementing
+ v2_authenticator_->ProcessMessage(message, resume_callback);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ const buzz::XmlElement* pairing_failed_tag =
+ message->FirstNamed(kPairingFailedTag);
+
+ if (pairing_failed_tag) {
+ // If pairing failed, prompt the user for the PIN and try again.
+ std::string error = pairing_failed_tag->Attr(kPairingErrorAttribute);
+ LOG(INFO) << "Pairing failed: " << error;
+ pairing_state_ = PROCESSING_MESSAGE;
+ SecretFetchedCallback callback = base::Bind(
+ &PairingClientAuthenticator::CreateV2AuthenticatorWithPIN,
+ weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr(), message, resume_callback);
rmsousa 2013/05/16 20:11:02 Strange, I think passing a naked pointer here shou
Jamie 2013/05/16 21:09:10 Done.
+ fetch_pin_callback_.Run(callback);
+ return;
+
+ } else {
+ // If it's not a pairing error message, create the V2 authenticator
+ // backed by the paired secret if it doesn't already exist, and let
+ // it process the message.
+ if (!v2_authenticator_) {
+ pairing_state_ = ACCEPTED;
+ v2_authenticator_ = V2Authenticator::CreateForClient(
+ paired_secret_, WAITING_MESSAGE);
+ }
+ v2_authenticator_->ProcessMessage(message, resume_callback);
+ }
+}
+
+scoped_ptr<buzz::XmlElement> PairingClientAuthenticator::GetNextMessage() {
+ DCHECK_EQ(state(), MESSAGE_READY);
+
+ // If the initial message has not yet been sent, return it now.
+ if (pairing_state_ == MESSAGE_READY) {
+ scoped_ptr<buzz::XmlElement> result = CreateEmptyAuthenticatorMessage();
+ buzz::XmlElement* pairing_tag = new buzz::XmlElement(kPairingInfoTag);
+ pairing_tag->AddAttr(kClientIdAttribute, client_id_);
+ result->AddElement(pairing_tag);
+ pairing_state_ = WAITING_MESSAGE;
+ return result.Pass();
+ }
+
+ // In all other cases, defer to the underlying authenticator.
+ DCHECK(v2_authenticator_);
+ return v2_authenticator_->GetNextMessage();
+}
+
+scoped_ptr<ChannelAuthenticator>
+PairingClientAuthenticator::CreateChannelAuthenticator() const {
+ return v2_authenticator_->CreateChannelAuthenticator();
+}
+
+void PairingClientAuthenticator::CreateV2AuthenticatorWithPIN(
+ const buzz::XmlElement* message,
+ const base::Closure& resume_callback,
+ const std::string& pin) {
+ pairing_state_ = REJECTED;
+ v2_authenticator_ = V2Authenticator::CreateForClient(
+ AuthenticationMethod::ApplyHashFunction(
+ AuthenticationMethod::HMAC_SHA256,
+ authentication_tag_, pin),
+ WAITING_MESSAGE);
+ ProcessMessage(message, resume_callback);
+}
+
+} // namespace protocol
+} // namespace remoting
« no previous file with comments | « remoting/protocol/pairing_client_authenticator.h ('k') | remoting/protocol/pairing_host_authenticator.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698