mojo/public/cpp/bindings/tests/array_unittest.cc - Issue 1475813002: Mojo C++ bindings: support passing associated interface pointers/requests in method parameter lists…

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Unified Diff: mojo/public/cpp/bindings/tests/array_unittest.cc

Issue 1475813002: Mojo C++ bindings: support passing associated interface pointers/requests in method parameter lists… (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@25_use_multiplex_router

Patch Set: Created 5 years, 1 month ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View side-by-side diff with in-line comments

Download patch

« no previous file with comments | « mojo/public/cpp/bindings/lib/string_serialization.cc ('k') | mojo/public/cpp/bindings/tests/associated_interface_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Hide Comments ('s')

Index: mojo/public/cpp/bindings/tests/array_unittest.cc

diff --git a/mojo/public/cpp/bindings/tests/array_unittest.cc b/mojo/public/cpp/bindings/tests/array_unittest.cc

index 8befe81d0fea6c7fa3f856c68b3e22b7dc895d35..b677cc1ff5b5d6477bd22322dd13d7415f9d235e 100644

--- a/mojo/public/cpp/bindings/tests/array_unittest.cc

+++ b/mojo/public/cpp/bindings/tests/array_unittest.cc

@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ TEST_F(ArrayTest, Serialization_ArrayOfPOD) {

SerializeArray_(array.Pass(), &buf, &data, &validate_params);

Array<int32_t> array2;

- Deserialize_(data, &array2);

+ Deserialize_(data, &array2, nullptr);

EXPECT_EQ(4U, array2.size());

for (size_t i = 0; i < array2.size(); ++i)

@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ TEST_F(ArrayTest, Serialization_EmptyArrayOfPOD) {

SerializeArray_(array.Pass(), &buf, &data, &validate_params);

Array<int32_t> array2;

- Deserialize_(data, &array2);

+ Deserialize_(data, &array2, nullptr);

EXPECT_EQ(0U, array2.size());

}

@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ TEST_F(ArrayTest, Serialization_ArrayOfArrayOfPOD) {

SerializeArray_(array.Pass(), &buf, &data, &validate_params);

Array<Array<int32_t>> array2;

- Deserialize_(data, &array2);

+ Deserialize_(data, &array2, nullptr);

EXPECT_EQ(2U, array2.size());

for (size_t j = 0; j < array2.size(); ++j) {

@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ TEST_F(ArrayTest, Serialization_ArrayOfBool) {

SerializeArray_(array.Pass(), &buf, &data, &validate_params);

Array<bool> array2;

- Deserialize_(data, &array2);

+ Deserialize_(data, &array2, nullptr);

EXPECT_EQ(10U, array2.size());

for (size_t i = 0; i < array2.size(); ++i)

@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ TEST_F(ArrayTest, Serialization_ArrayOfString) {

SerializeArray_(array.Pass(), &buf, &data, &validate_params);

Array<String> array2;

- Deserialize_(data, &array2);

+ Deserialize_(data, &array2, nullptr);

EXPECT_EQ(10U, array2.size());

for (size_t i = 0; i < array2.size(); ++i) {