Roll libvpx 244953:247061 to pick up win build changes.

Roll libvpx 244953:247061 to pick up win build changes.

This should make it possible to build libvpx on Windows w/o needing a
cygwin bash shell, removing possibly the last use of that beast ...

R=scottmg@chromium.org, johannkoenig@chromium.org, tomfinegan@chromium.org
BUG=123026
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=247331

[scottmg, 2014-01-25 07:15:18]

lgtm

[Johann, 2014-01-27 18:23:35]

LGTM

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-01-27 19:51:47]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/dpranke@chromium.org/147563002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-01-27 22:42:30]

Change committed as 247331

[scottmg, 2014-01-29 03:32:04]

Pulling origin/master in libvpx it looks like this should have been 247062?

Who was the derpy first reviewer on this one... :p

In any case, is it safe to roll again?

[Johann, 2014-01-29 04:14:44]

On 2014/01/29 03:32:04, scottmg wrote:
> Pulling origin/master in libvpx it looks like this should have been 247062?

Oops indeed ...
 
> Who was the derpy first reviewer on this one... :p
> 
> In any case, is it safe to roll again?

I'm working on a roll which will include this. It's going to take a bit though:
https://codereview.chromium.org/148173012/

[Johann, 2014-01-29 04:18:30]

On 2014/01/29 04:14:44, Johann wrote:
> On 2014/01/29 03:32:04, scottmg wrote:
> > Pulling origin/master in libvpx it looks like this should have been 247062?

And now it makes sense why this didn't turn up in the roll:
https://codereview.chromium.org/130513006/

[scottmg, 2014-01-29 04:42:05]

On 2014/01/29 04:14:44, Johann wrote:
> On 2014/01/29 03:32:04, scottmg wrote:
> > Pulling origin/master in libvpx it looks like this should have been 247062?
> 
> Oops indeed ...
>  
> > Who was the derpy first reviewer on this one... :p
> > 
> > In any case, is it safe to roll again?
> 
> I'm working on a roll which will include this. It's going to take a bit
though:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/148173012/

Great, thanks. It's not a huge rush.

[Dirk Pranke, 2014-01-29 17:36:49]

Yes, it's all the reviewer's fault ... :(.