Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(90)

Unified Diff: sync/sessions/nudge_tracker.cc

Issue 146113003: sync: GU retry with less explicit TimeTicks logic (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Simplify updates; add more tests Created 6 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « sync/sessions/nudge_tracker.h ('k') | sync/sessions/nudge_tracker_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: sync/sessions/nudge_tracker.cc
diff --git a/sync/sessions/nudge_tracker.cc b/sync/sessions/nudge_tracker.cc
index f96d3464826e86653fb04d515c7d9575d891f2be..13186c7a678008c1f5f740384472298a59d25d4c 100644
--- a/sync/sessions/nudge_tracker.cc
+++ b/sync/sessions/nudge_tracker.cc
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ size_t NudgeTracker::kDefaultMaxPayloadsPerType = 10;
NudgeTracker::NudgeTracker()
: updates_source_(sync_pb::GetUpdatesCallerInfo::UNKNOWN),
invalidations_enabled_(false),
- invalidations_out_of_sync_(true) {
+ invalidations_out_of_sync_(true),
+ is_retry_required_(false) {
ModelTypeSet protocol_types = ProtocolTypes();
// Default initialize all the type trackers.
for (ModelTypeSet::Iterator it = protocol_types.First(); it.Good();
@@ -44,11 +45,11 @@ bool NudgeTracker::IsSyncRequired() const {
return false;
}
-bool NudgeTracker::IsGetUpdatesRequired(base::TimeTicks now) const {
+bool NudgeTracker::IsGetUpdatesRequired() const {
if (invalidations_out_of_sync_)
return true;
- if (IsRetryRequired(now))
+ if (IsRetryRequired())
return true;
for (TypeTrackerMap::const_iterator it = type_trackers_.begin();
@@ -60,16 +61,18 @@ bool NudgeTracker::IsGetUpdatesRequired(base::TimeTicks now) const {
return false;
}
-bool NudgeTracker::IsRetryRequired(base::TimeTicks now) const {
- return !next_retry_time_.is_null() && next_retry_time_ < now;
+bool NudgeTracker::IsRetryRequired() const {
+ return is_retry_required_;
}
-void NudgeTracker::RecordSuccessfulSyncCycle(base::TimeTicks now) {
+void NudgeTracker::RecordSuccessfulSyncCycle() {
updates_source_ = sync_pb::GetUpdatesCallerInfo::UNKNOWN;
- last_successful_sync_time_ = now;
- if (next_retry_time_ < now)
- next_retry_time_ = base::TimeTicks();
+ // If a retry was required, we've just serviced it. Unset the flag.
+ is_retry_required_ = false;
+
+ // We don't unset the next_retry_time_ flag here, since it may have been
+ // updated during the sync cycle that just completed.
// A successful cycle while invalidations are enabled puts us back into sync.
invalidations_out_of_sync_ = !invalidations_enabled_;
@@ -239,6 +242,20 @@ void NudgeTracker::FillProtoMessage(
type_trackers_.find(type)->second.FillGetUpdatesTriggersMessage(msg);
}
+void NudgeTracker::ToggleRetryFlagIfRequired(base::TimeTicks now) {
+ // Assume we have nothing to do.
+ is_retry_required_ = false;
+
+ // Nothing to do if no retries are scheduled.
+ if (next_retry_time_.is_null())
+ return;
+
+ if (next_retry_time_ < now) {
haitaol1 2014/01/28 20:09:20 where is next_retry_time nulled? Seems nudge track
rlarocque 2014/01/28 22:24:38 Thanks! I had a nagging feeling that this code wa
+ // The time has come. We should perform a GU retry as soon as possible.
+ is_retry_required_ = true;
+ }
+}
+
void NudgeTracker::SetHintBufferSize(size_t size) {
for (TypeTrackerMap::iterator it = type_trackers_.begin();
it != type_trackers_.end(); ++it) {
@@ -246,5 +263,9 @@ void NudgeTracker::SetHintBufferSize(size_t size) {
}
}
+void NudgeTracker::SetNextRetryTime(base::TimeTicks retry_time) {
+ next_retry_time_ = retry_time;
+}
+
} // namespace sessions
} // namespace syncer
« no previous file with comments | « sync/sessions/nudge_tracker.h ('k') | sync/sessions/nudge_tracker_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698