Index: components/sync_bookmarks/bookmark_model_associator.cc |
diff --git a/components/sync_bookmarks/bookmark_model_associator.cc b/components/sync_bookmarks/bookmark_model_associator.cc |
index 27b5824aa705e7306c6ae1f8954cf85c5c87a414..00bf5afaac8b5c2dff1c33cb77643191db17e76c 100644 |
--- a/components/sync_bookmarks/bookmark_model_associator.cc |
+++ b/components/sync_bookmarks/bookmark_model_associator.cc |
@@ -371,26 +371,6 @@ BookmarkModelAssociator::~BookmarkModelAssociator() { |
DCHECK(thread_checker_.CalledOnValidThread()); |
} |
-void BookmarkModelAssociator::UpdatePermanentNodeVisibility() { |
- DCHECK(thread_checker_.CalledOnValidThread()); |
- DCHECK(bookmark_model_->loaded()); |
- |
- BookmarkNode::Type bookmark_node_types[] = { |
- BookmarkNode::BOOKMARK_BAR, |
- BookmarkNode::OTHER_NODE, |
- BookmarkNode::MOBILE, |
- }; |
- for (size_t i = 0; i < arraysize(bookmark_node_types); ++i) { |
- int64 id = bookmark_model_->PermanentNode(bookmark_node_types[i])->id(); |
- bookmark_model_->SetPermanentNodeVisible( |
- bookmark_node_types[i], |
- id_map_.find(id) != id_map_.end()); |
- } |
- |
- // Note: the root node may have additional extra nodes. Currently their |
- // visibility is not affected by sync. |
-} |
- |
syncer::SyncError BookmarkModelAssociator::DisassociateModels() { |
id_map_.clear(); |
id_map_inverse_.clear(); |
@@ -437,10 +417,6 @@ void BookmarkModelAssociator::Associate(const BookmarkNode* node, |
const syncer::BaseNode& sync_node) { |
AddAssociation(node, sync_node.GetId()); |
- // TODO(stanisc): crbug.com/456876: consider not doing this on every single |
noyau (Ping after 24h)
2015/11/18 16:49:15
Please add this bug number to the bug description
|
- // association. |
- UpdatePermanentNodeVisibility(); |
- |
// The same check exists in PersistAssociations. However it is better to |
// do the check earlier to avoid the cost of decrypting nodes again |
// in PersistAssociations. |