Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(130)

Side by Side Diff: mojo/services/asset_bundle/interfaces/asset_bundle.mojom

Issue 1454113003: Require an explicit ServiceName annotation for interfaces in C++. (Closed) Base URL: https://github.com/domokit/mojo.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
OLDNEW
1 // Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. 1 // Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 // found in the LICENSE file. 3 // found in the LICENSE file.
4 4
5 [DartPackage="mojo_services"] 5 [DartPackage="mojo_services"]
6 module mojo.asset_bundle; 6 module mojo.asset_bundle;
7 7
8 [ServiceName="mojo::asset_bundle::AssetBundle"]
8 interface AssetBundle { 9 interface AssetBundle {
9 GetAsStream(string asset_name) => (handle<data_pipe_consumer> asset_data); 10 GetAsStream(string asset_name) => (handle<data_pipe_consumer> asset_data);
10 }; 11 };
11 12
13 [ServiceName="mojo::asset_bundle::AssetUnpacker"]
12 interface AssetUnpacker { 14 interface AssetUnpacker {
13 UnpackZipStream(handle<data_pipe_consumer> zipped_assets, AssetBundle& asset_b undle); 15 UnpackZipStream(handle<data_pipe_consumer> zipped_assets, AssetBundle& asset_b undle);
14 }; 16 };
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698