Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(96)

Unified Diff: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/frame/csp/ContentSecurityPolicy.cpp

Issue 1444173002: third_party/WebKit: fix typos found in comments (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/frame/csp/ContentSecurityPolicy.cpp
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/frame/csp/ContentSecurityPolicy.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/frame/csp/ContentSecurityPolicy.cpp
index 40fc72737fa8099116238163fbf380fe304b6294..71e71bc06525b37637630986bdb85dc8e0ff52e8 100644
--- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/frame/csp/ContentSecurityPolicy.cpp
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/frame/csp/ContentSecurityPolicy.cpp
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ void ContentSecurityPolicy::reportViolation(const String& directiveText, const S
// directive that was violated. The document's URL is safe to send because
// it's the document itself that's requesting that it be sent. You could
// make an argument that we shouldn't send HTTPS document URLs to HTTP
- // report-uris (for the same reasons that we supress the Referer in that
+ // report-uris (for the same reasons that we suppress the Referer in that
// case), but the Referer is sent implicitly whereas this request is only
// sent explicitly. As for which directive was violated, that's pretty
// harmless information.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698