Chromium Code Reviews| Index: test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py |
| diff --git a/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py b/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py |
| index 7d1c5285f354c485c9dd56acb26073851b8872e7..4ae7e60156fd004d518520d85c5d14c506002dac 100644 |
| --- a/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py |
| +++ b/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py |
| @@ -14,11 +14,13 @@ found_all = 'Found dependency (all)' |
| not_found = 'No dependencies' |
| -def _CreateConfigFile(files, targets): |
| +def _CreateConfigFile(files, compile_targets, test_targets=[]): |
|
Dirk Pranke
2015/11/12 00:37:20
nit: call the arg 'additional_compile_targets' ?
sky
2015/11/12 00:47:23
Done.
|
| """Creates the analyzer config file, which is used as the input to analyzer. |
| See description of analyzer.py for description of the arguments.""" |
| f = open('test_file', 'w') |
| - to_write = {'files': files, 'targets': targets } |
| + to_write = {'files': files, |
| + 'test_targets': test_targets, |
| + 'additional_compile_targets': compile_targets } |
| json.dump(to_write, f) |
| f.close() |
| @@ -69,8 +71,8 @@ def run_analyzer4(*args, **kw): |
| test.run_gyp('test4.gyp', *args, **kw) |
| -def EnsureContains(matched=False, build_targets=set()): |
| - """Verifies output contains |build_targets|.""" |
| +def EnsureContains(matched=False, compile_targets=set(), test_targets=set()): |
| + """Verifies output contains |compile_targets|.""" |
| result = _ReadOutputFileContents() |
| if result.get('error', None): |
| print 'unexpected error', result.get('error') |
| @@ -80,17 +82,16 @@ def EnsureContains(matched=False, build_targets=set()): |
| print 'unexpected invalid_targets', result.get('invalid_targets') |
| test.fail_test() |
| - # TODO(sky): nuke when get rid of targets. |
| - targets = build_targets |
| - actual_targets = set(result['targets']) |
| - if actual_targets != targets: |
| - print 'actual targets:', actual_targets, '\nexpected targets:', targets |
| + actual_compile_targets = set(result['compile_targets']) |
| + if actual_compile_targets != compile_targets: |
| + print 'actual compile_targets:', actual_compile_targets, \ |
| + '\nexpected compile_targets:', compile_targets |
| test.fail_test() |
| - actual_build_targets = set(result['build_targets']) |
| - if actual_build_targets != build_targets: |
| - print 'actual build_targets:', actual_build_targets, \ |
| - '\nexpected build_targets:', build_targets |
| + actual_test_targets = set(result['test_targets']) |
| + if actual_test_targets != test_targets: |
| + print 'actual test_targets:', actual_test_targets, \ |
| + '\nexpected test_targets:', test_targets |
| test.fail_test() |
| if matched and result['status'] != found: |
| @@ -101,7 +102,7 @@ def EnsureContains(matched=False, build_targets=set()): |
| test.fail_test() |
| -def EnsureMatchedAll(targets): |
| +def EnsureMatchedAll(compile_targets, test_targets=set()): |
| result = _ReadOutputFileContents() |
| if result.get('error', None): |
| print 'unexpected error', result.get('error') |
| @@ -115,9 +116,16 @@ def EnsureMatchedAll(targets): |
| print 'expected', found_all, 'got', result['status'] |
| test.fail_test() |
| - actual_targets = set(result['targets']) |
| - if actual_targets != targets: |
| - print 'actual targets:', actual_targets, '\nexpected targets:', targets |
| + actual_compile_targets = set(result['compile_targets']) |
| + if actual_compile_targets != compile_targets: |
| + print ('actual compile_targets:', actual_compile_targets, |
| + '\nexpected compile_targets:', compile_targets) |
| + test.fail_test() |
| + |
| + actual_test_targets = set(result['test_targets']) |
| + if actual_test_targets != test_targets: |
| + print ('actual test_targets:', actual_test_targets, |
| + '\nexpected test_targets:', test_targets) |
| test.fail_test() |
| @@ -150,9 +158,9 @@ def EnsureInvalidTargets(expected_invalid_targets): |
| # Two targets, A and B (both static_libraries) and A depends upon B. If a file |
| # in B changes, then both A and B are output. It is not strictly necessary that |
| # A is compiled in this case, only B. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['b.c'], ['a']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['b.c'], ['all']) |
| test.run_gyp('static_library_test.gyp', *CommonArgs()) |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a' ,'b'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a' ,'b'}) |
| # Verifies config_path must be specified. |
| test.run_gyp('test.gyp') |
| @@ -164,7 +172,7 @@ test.run_gyp('test.gyp', '-Gconfig_path=bogus_file', |
| EnsureError('Unable to open file bogus_file') |
| # Verify 'invalid_targets' is present when bad target is specified. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['bad_target', 'all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['bad_target']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| EnsureInvalidTargets({'bad_target'}) |
| @@ -174,196 +182,242 @@ run_analyzer() |
| EnsureError('Unable to parse config file test_file') |
| # Trivial test of a source. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| # Conditional source that is excluded. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| EnsureContains(matched=False) |
| # Conditional source that is included by way of argument. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer('-Dtest_variable=1') |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| # Two unknown files. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'unoknow2.cc'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'unoknow2.cc'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| EnsureContains() |
| # Two unknown files. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_sourcex.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_sourcex.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| EnsureContains() |
| # Included dependency |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_source.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe3'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe', 'exe3'}) |
| # Included inputs to actions. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['action_input.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['action_input.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| # Don't consider outputs. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['action_output.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['action_output.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| EnsureContains(matched=False) |
| # Rule inputs. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['rule_input.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['rule_input.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| # Ignore path specified with PRODUCT_DIR. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['product_dir_input.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['product_dir_input.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| EnsureContains(matched=False) |
| # Path specified via a variable. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source2.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source2.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| # Verifies paths with // are fixed up correctly. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['parent_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['parent_source.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe3'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe', 'exe3'}) |
| # Verifies relative paths are resolved correctly. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source.h'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source.h'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| # Verifies relative paths in inputs are resolved correctly. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['rel_path1.h'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['rel_path1.h'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| # Various permutations when passing in targets. |
| _CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], |
| - ['exe', 'exe3', 'all', 'exe2']) |
| + ['all'], ['exe', 'exe3']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe3'}, |
| + compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], |
| - ['exe', 'all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['all'], ['exe']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| # Verifies duplicates are ignored. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], |
| - ['exe', 'exe', 'all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['all'], |
| + ['exe', 'exe']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['exe', 'all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['all'], ['exe']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c', 'exe2.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c', 'exe2.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe3', 'all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['all'], ['exe3']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe3'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe3'}, compile_targets={'exe3'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2'}) |
| + |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all']) |
| +run_analyzer() |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| # Assertions when modifying build (gyp/gypi) files, especially when said files |
| # are included. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/d.cc'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/d.cc'], ['all'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3']) |
| run_analyzer2() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe', 'foo'}, |
| + compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.includes.gypi'], |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.includes.gypi'], ['all'], |
| ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3']) |
| run_analyzer2() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe', 'foo'}, |
| + compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.gyp'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.gyp'], ['all'], |
| + ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3']) |
| run_analyzer2() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe', 'foo'}, |
| + compile_targets={'exe'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['test2.includes.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['test2.includes.gypi'], ['all'], |
| + ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3']) |
| run_analyzer2() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'}, |
| + compile_targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| # Verify modifying a file included makes all targets dirty. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['common.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['common.gypi'], ['all'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3']) |
| run_analyzer2('-Icommon.gypi') |
| -EnsureMatchedAll({'exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'}) |
| +EnsureMatchedAll({'all'}, {'exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'}) |
| # Assertions from test3.gyp. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['d.c', 'f.c'], ['a', 'all']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c', 'f.c'], ['all'], ['a']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'all']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all'], ['a']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| _CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| _CreateConfigFile(['c.c', 'e.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'e'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'e'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'all']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all'], ['a']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b', 'all']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all'], ['a', 'b']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b', 'all']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all'], ['a', 'b']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'b', 'all']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all'], ['a', 'b']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a', 'b'}, |
| + compile_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'all']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all'], ['a']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'all']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all'], ['a']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'a'}, compile_targets={'a'}) |
| _CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a'}) |
| _CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer3() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a', 'b'}) |
| # Assertions around test4.gyp. |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'e', 'h']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer4() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'e', 'f'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'e', 'f'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'e', 'h']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer4() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'}) |
| -_CreateConfigFile(['i.c'], ['a', 'e', 'h']) |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['i.c'], ['all']) |
| run_analyzer4() |
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'h', 'i'}) |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'h', 'i'}) |
| + |
| +# Assertions where 'all' is not supplied in compile_targets. |
| + |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], [], ['exe2']) |
| +run_analyzer() |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe2'}, compile_targets={'exe2'}) |
| + |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe20.c'], [], ['exe2']) |
| +run_analyzer() |
| +EnsureContains(matched=False) |
| + |
| + |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'exe3.c'], [], ['exe2', 'exe3']) |
| +run_analyzer() |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}, |
| + compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| + |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'exe3.c'], ['exe3'], ['exe2']) |
| +run_analyzer() |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, test_targets={'exe2'}, |
| + compile_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'}) |
| + |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe3.c'], ['exe2'], ['exe2']) |
| +run_analyzer() |
| +EnsureContains(matched=False) |
| + |
| +# Assertions with 'all' listed as a test_target. |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe3.c'], [], ['all']) |
| +run_analyzer() |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe3'}, test_targets={'all'}) |
| + |
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], [], ['all', 'exe2']) |
| +run_analyzer() |
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, compile_targets={'exe2'}, |
| + test_targets={'all', 'exe2'}) |
| test.pass_test() |