Changes semantics of analyzer

test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer-deprecated.py

 #!/usr/bin/env python
 # Copyright (c) 2014 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 # found in the LICENSE file.
 
 """Tests for analyzer
 """
 
 import json
 import TestGyp
@@ skipping 146 matching lines @@
 # Verifies config_path must be specified.
 test.run_gyp('test.gyp')
 EnsureStdoutContains('Must specify files to analyze via config_path')
 
 # Verifies config_path must point to a valid file.
 test.run_gyp('test.gyp', '-Gconfig_path=bogus_file',
              '-Ganalyzer_output_path=analyzer_output')
 EnsureError('Unable to open file bogus_file')
 
 # Verify 'invalid_targets' is present when bad target is specified.
-_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['bad_target', 'all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['bad_target', 'allx', 'exe2'])

[Dirk Pranke, 2015/11/12 00:37:20]

why does this change to 'allx' ?

[sky, 2015/11/12 00:47:23]

You found out in test/analyzer/test.gyp . I renamed the target to not conflict
with 'all'. I didn't duplicate all the gyp files, so I had to rename here.

 run_analyzer()
 EnsureInvalidTargets({'bad_target'})
 
 # Verifies config_path must point to a valid json file.
 _CreateBogusConfigFile()
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureError('Unable to parse config file test_file')
 
 # Trivial test of a source.
-_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 # Conditional source that is excluded.
-_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=False)
 
 # Conditional source that is included by way of argument.
-_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer('-Dtest_variable=1')
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 # Two unknown files.
-_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'unoknow2.cc'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'unoknow2.cc'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains()
 
 # Two unknown files.
-_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_sourcex.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_sourcex.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains()
 
 # Included dependency
-_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_source.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe3'})
 
 # Included inputs to actions.
-_CreateConfigFile(['action_input.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['action_input.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 # Don't consider outputs.
-_CreateConfigFile(['action_output.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['action_output.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=False)
 
 # Rule inputs.
-_CreateConfigFile(['rule_input.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['rule_input.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 # Ignore path specified with PRODUCT_DIR.
-_CreateConfigFile(['product_dir_input.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['product_dir_input.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=False)
 
 # Path specified via a variable.
-_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source2.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source2.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 # Verifies paths with // are fixed up correctly.
-_CreateConfigFile(['parent_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['parent_source.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe3'})
 
 # Verifies relative paths are resolved correctly.
-_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source.h'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source.h'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 # Verifies relative paths in inputs are resolved correctly.
-_CreateConfigFile(['rel_path1.h'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['rel_path1.h'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 # Various permutations when passing in targets.
 _CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'],
-                  ['exe', 'exe3', 'all', 'exe2'])
+                  ['exe', 'exe3', 'allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
 
 _CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'],
-                  ['exe', 'all', 'exe2'])
+                  ['exe', 'allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
 
 # Verifies duplicates are ignored.
 _CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'],
-                  ['exe', 'exe', 'all', 'exe2'])
+                  ['exe', 'exe', 'allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['exe', 'all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['exe', 'allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c', 'exe2.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c', 'exe2.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe3', 'all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe3', 'allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe3'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['allx', 'exe2'])
 run_analyzer()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 # Assertions when modifying build (gyp/gypi) files, especially when said files
 # are included.
 _CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/d.cc'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
 run_analyzer2()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 _CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.includes.gypi'],
                 ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
 run_analyzer2()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 _CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.gyp'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
 run_analyzer2()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
 
 _CreateConfigFile(['test2.includes.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
 run_analyzer2()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'})
 
 # Verify modifying a file included makes all targets dirty.
 _CreateConfigFile(['common.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
 run_analyzer2('-Icommon.gypi')
 EnsureMatchedAll({'exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'})
 
 # Assertions from test3.gyp.
-_CreateConfigFile(['d.c', 'f.c'], ['a', 'all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['d.c', 'f.c'], ['a', 'allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['c.c', 'e.c'], ['all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['c.c', 'e.c'], ['allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'e'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b', 'all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b', 'allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b', 'all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b', 'allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'b', 'all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'b', 'allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
 
-_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all'])
+_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['allx'])
 run_analyzer3()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
 
 # Assertions around test4.gyp.
 _CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'e', 'h'])
 run_analyzer4()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'e', 'f'})
 
 _CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'e', 'h'])
 run_analyzer4()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'})
 
 _CreateConfigFile(['i.c'], ['a', 'e', 'h'])
 run_analyzer4()
 EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'h', 'i'})
 
 test.pass_test()