Kills TraceTicks, which was functionally the same as TimeTicks

base/time/time_win.cc

Index: base/time/time_win.cc
diff --git a/base/time/time_win.cc b/base/time/time_win.cc
index bc058040d0c7b5a23923383741bbc811713c6485..6022772615395273d75b68c1113286cf488ba80c 100644
--- a/base/time/time_win.cc
+++ b/base/time/time_win.cc
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ using base::ThreadTicks;
 using base::Time;
 using base::TimeDelta;
 using base::TimeTicks;
-using base::TraceTicks;
 
 namespace {
 
@@ -459,14 +458,6 @@ void InitializeNowFunctionPointer() {
   //
   // Otherwise, Now uses the high-resolution QPC clock. As of 21 August 2015,
   // ~72% of users fall within this category.
-  //
-  // TraceTicks::Now() always uses the same clock as TimeTicks::Now(), even
-  // when the QPC exists but is expensive or unreliable. This is because we'd
-  // eventually like to merge TraceTicks and TimeTicks and have one type of
-  // timestamp that is reliable, monotonic, and comparable. Also, while we could
-  // use the high-resolution timer for TraceTicks even when it's unreliable or
-  // slow, it's easier to make tracing tools accommodate a coarse timer than
-  // one that's unreliable or slow.
   NowFunction now_function;
   base::CPU cpu;
   if (ticks_per_sec.QuadPart <= 0 ||
@@ -612,9 +603,6 @@ double ThreadTicks::TSCTicksPerSecond() {
   return tsc_ticks_per_second;
 }
 
-// static
-TraceTicks TraceTicks::Now() {
-  return TraceTicks() + g_now_function();
 }
 
 // static