Load the table of visited links from database file asynchronously.

third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/VisitedLinkState.cpp

Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/VisitedLinkState.cpp
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/VisitedLinkState.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/VisitedLinkState.cpp
index c5b047572688d1c386bc72def282c520e34fa104..d69974341b38c51f99b7f2caffc2250923d832e1 100644
--- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/VisitedLinkState.cpp
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/VisitedLinkState.cpp
@@ -59,13 +59,16 @@ VisitedLinkState::VisitedLinkState(const Document& document)
 {
 }
 
-void VisitedLinkState::invalidateStyleForAllLinks()
+void VisitedLinkState::invalidateStyleForAllLinks(bool invalidateVisitedLinkHashes)
 {
     if (m_linksCheckedForVisitedState.isEmpty())
         return;
     for (Node& node : NodeTraversal::startsAt(document().firstChild())) {
-        if (node.isLink())
+        if (node.isLink()) {
+            if (invalidateVisitedLinkHashes && isHTMLAnchorElement(node))

[brettw, 2015/12/08 00:54:42]

Although I'm in the root-level owners file, I'm not really qualified to review
this code. Can you get a WebKit/DOM reviewer to look at this? I think it's all
trivial except for this one function, which is hopefully also trivial from their
perspective.

+                toHTMLAnchorElement(node).invalidateCachedVisitedLinkHash();
             node.setNeedsStyleRecalc(SubtreeStyleChange, StyleChangeReasonForTracing::create(StyleChangeReason::VisitedLink));
+        }
     }
 }