Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(466)

Unified Diff: base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc

Issue 1414793009: Allow SequencedTaskRunnerHandle::Get() while running unsequenced tasks. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: added comment Created 5 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc b/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
index 5812ee75ac5f84df1fc7df48d107b1a1c69d84e8..ae743b5b19a25e83647fe925e372f878561249cc 100644
--- a/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
+++ b/base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool_unittest.cc
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include "base/message_loop/message_loop.h"
#include "base/synchronization/condition_variable.h"
#include "base/synchronization/lock.h"
+#include "base/synchronization/waitable_event.h"
#include "base/test/sequenced_task_runner_test_template.h"
#include "base/test/sequenced_worker_pool_owner.h"
#include "base/test/task_runner_test_template.h"
@@ -904,47 +905,71 @@ TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, FlushForTesting) {
pool()->FlushForTesting();
}
-namespace {
-
-void CheckWorkerPoolAndSequenceToken(
- const scoped_refptr<SequencedWorkerPool>& expected_pool,
- SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken expected_token) {
- SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken token =
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequenceTokenForCurrentThread();
- EXPECT_EQ(expected_token.ToString(), token.ToString());
-
- scoped_refptr<SequencedWorkerPool> pool =
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetWorkerPoolForCurrentThread();
- EXPECT_EQ(expected_pool, pool);
+// Helper method for VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner().
+void VerifySequencedTaskRunnerRunsOnCurrentThread(
+ SequencedTaskRunner* task_runner,
+ bool should_run_on_current_thread,
+ const Closure& callback) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(should_run_on_current_thread,
+ task_runner->RunsTasksOnCurrentThread());
+ callback.Run();
}
-} // namespace
-
-TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, GetWorkerPoolAndSequenceTokenForCurrentThread) {
- EnsureAllWorkersCreated();
+void VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner(
+ scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> expected_task_runner,
danakj 2015/11/20 19:18:43 Sorry I meant you can take a SequencedTaskRunner*
+ bool expected_equal,
+ const Closure& callback) {
+ scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner =
+ SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread();
- // The current thread should have neither a worker pool nor a sequence token.
- SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken local_token =
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequenceTokenForCurrentThread();
- scoped_refptr<SequencedWorkerPool> local_pool =
- SequencedWorkerPool::GetWorkerPoolForCurrentThread();
- EXPECT_FALSE(local_token.IsValid()) << local_token.ToString();
- EXPECT_FALSE(local_pool);
+ // If the expected task runner is null, get another one for the current
+ // thread. They should be the same.
+ if (!expected_task_runner) {
+ expected_task_runner =
+ SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread();
+ }
- SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken token1 = pool()->GetSequenceToken();
- SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken token2 = pool()->GetSequenceToken();
- pool()->PostSequencedWorkerTask(
- token1, FROM_HERE,
- base::Bind(&CheckWorkerPoolAndSequenceToken, pool(), token1));
- pool()->PostSequencedWorkerTask(
- token2, FROM_HERE,
- base::Bind(&CheckWorkerPoolAndSequenceToken, pool(), token2));
+ // SequencedTaskRunner does not allow directly checking for equality, but we
+ // can post a task to one task runner and verify that the other task runner
+ // is on the same sequence.
+ task_runner->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE,
+ Bind(&VerifySequencedTaskRunnerRunsOnCurrentThread,
+ std::move(expected_task_runner), expected_equal, callback));
+}
- pool()->PostWorkerTask(FROM_HERE,
- base::Bind(&CheckWorkerPoolAndSequenceToken, pool(),
- SequencedWorkerPool::SequenceToken()));
+TEST_F(SequencedWorkerPoolTest, GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread) {
+ EnsureAllWorkersCreated();
- pool()->FlushForTesting();
+ // The current thread should not have a sequenced task runner from a
+ // worker pool.
+ scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> local_task_runner =
+ SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequencedTaskRunnerForCurrentThread();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(local_task_runner);
+
+ WaitableEvent event(false, false);
+ Closure signal = Bind(&WaitableEvent::Signal, Unretained(&event));
+ scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner_1 =
+ pool()->GetSequencedTaskRunner(SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequenceToken());
+ scoped_refptr<SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner_2 =
+ pool()->GetSequencedTaskRunner(SequencedWorkerPool::GetSequenceToken());
+ task_runner_1->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner,
+ base::Unretained(task_runner_1.get()), true, signal));
+ event.Wait();
+ task_runner_2->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner,
+ base::Unretained(task_runner_2.get()), true, signal));
+ event.Wait();
+
+ task_runner_1->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, Bind(&VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner,
+ base::Unretained(task_runner_2.get()), false, signal));
+ event.Wait();
+
+ pool()->PostWorkerTask(FROM_HERE, Bind(&VerifyCurrentSequencedTaskRunner,
+ nullptr, true, signal));
+ event.Wait();
}
TEST(SequencedWorkerPoolRefPtrTest, ShutsDownCleanWithContinueOnShutdown) {
« base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool.cc ('K') | « base/threading/sequenced_worker_pool.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698