Index: LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt |
diff --git a/LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt b/LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt |
index 831df2b502e618b0b95bd7f2a06e2b4590fbed1c..76b1a6ee391bdbf3bbde34097a376035815ed7dc 100644 |
--- a/LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt |
+++ b/LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt |
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ Note:The width of the css tables inclusive of its border width. |
PASS maxGreatThanMinWidthAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
PASS minGreatThanMaxWidthAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
PASS onlyMaxWidthAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
-PASS maxWidthZeroAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 0 |
+PASS maxWidthZeroAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 113 |
esprehn
2013/04/19 08:07:25
Funny this output was wrong.
Julien - ping for review
2013/04/19 21:29:12
Yeah, I didn't double check the test on other brow
|
PASS maxGreatThanMinWidthFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
PASS minGreatThanMaxWidthFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
PASS onlyMaxWidthFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
-PASS maxWidthZeroFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 0 |
+PASS maxWidthZeroFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 2 |
PASS successfullyParsed is true |
TEST COMPLETE |