Chromium Code Reviews| Index: LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt |
| diff --git a/LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt b/LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt |
| index 831df2b502e618b0b95bd7f2a06e2b4590fbed1c..76b1a6ee391bdbf3bbde34097a376035815ed7dc 100644 |
| --- a/LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt |
| +++ b/LayoutTests/fast/table/css-table-max-width-expected.txt |
| @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ Note:The width of the css tables inclusive of its border width. |
| PASS maxGreatThanMinWidthAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
| PASS minGreatThanMaxWidthAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
| PASS onlyMaxWidthAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
| -PASS maxWidthZeroAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 0 |
| +PASS maxWidthZeroAutoLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 113 |
|
esprehn
2013/04/19 08:07:25
Funny this output was wrong.
Julien - ping for review
2013/04/19 21:29:12
Yeah, I didn't double check the test on other brow
|
| PASS maxGreatThanMinWidthFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
| PASS minGreatThanMaxWidthFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
| PASS onlyMaxWidthFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 202 |
| -PASS maxWidthZeroFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 0 |
| +PASS maxWidthZeroFixedLayout.getBoundingClientRect().width is 2 |
| PASS successfullyParsed is true |
| TEST COMPLETE |