Index: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt |
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt |
index 5afb868709a14f13eda4cf1fa7cd82872e01c8d8..2fb18f56a39260b1b6f1981d813ccfe0d43522f2 100644 |
--- a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt |
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt |
@@ -5,9 +5,6 @@ |
"bounds": [800, 600], |
"contentsOpaque": true, |
"drawsContent": true, |
- "repaintRects": [ |
chrishtr
2015/10/30 18:28:18
Why would this CL lead to less invalidation?
Xianzhu
2015/10/30 19:15:28
Previously spurious invalidation occurs in the fol
Xianzhu
2015/10/30 19:44:40
Rereading found this sentence is not clear:
"The
|
- [0, 0, 100, 100] |
- ], |
"paintInvalidationClients": [ |
"LayoutBlockFlow (relative positioned) DIV id='inner'" |
], |