Chromium Code Reviews| Index: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt |
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt |
| index 5afb868709a14f13eda4cf1fa7cd82872e01c8d8..2fb18f56a39260b1b6f1981d813ccfe0d43522f2 100644 |
| --- a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt |
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/repaint/stacking-context-lost-expected.txt |
| @@ -5,9 +5,6 @@ |
| "bounds": [800, 600], |
| "contentsOpaque": true, |
| "drawsContent": true, |
| - "repaintRects": [ |
|
chrishtr
2015/10/30 18:28:18
Why would this CL lead to less invalidation?
Xianzhu
2015/10/30 19:15:28
Previously spurious invalidation occurs in the fol
Xianzhu
2015/10/30 19:44:40
Rereading found this sentence is not clear:
"The
|
| - [0, 0, 100, 100] |
| - ], |
| "paintInvalidationClients": [ |
| "LayoutBlockFlow (relative positioned) DIV id='inner'" |
| ], |