Chromium Code Reviews| Index: third_party/WebKit/Source/web/WebRemoteFrameImpl.cpp |
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/Source/web/WebRemoteFrameImpl.cpp b/third_party/WebKit/Source/web/WebRemoteFrameImpl.cpp |
| index a9190ea63afda8f74711d439d1790bb68597b112..664a343ecbb6ec64e2edb498a8000a899a20562b 100644 |
| --- a/third_party/WebKit/Source/web/WebRemoteFrameImpl.cpp |
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/Source/web/WebRemoteFrameImpl.cpp |
| @@ -85,8 +85,9 @@ void WebRemoteFrameImpl::close() |
| WebString WebRemoteFrameImpl::uniqueName() const |
| { |
| - ASSERT_NOT_REACHED(); |
| - return WebString(); |
| + // FIXME: Why aren't these name methods allowed in WebRemoteFrame? |
| + ASSERT(frame()); |
| + return frame()->tree().uniqueName(); |
|
Charlie Reis
2015/11/06 23:04:48
I'm not sure why name and uniqueName aren't allowe
dcheng
2015/11/25 18:14:51
Actually, let's try to limit the API surface of We
Charlie Reis
2015/11/25 18:22:43
Ok, will do.
|
| } |
| WebString WebRemoteFrameImpl::assignedName() const |