Issue 141042: Fix regexp bug reported on iit.edu.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Issue 141042: Fix regexp bug reported on iit.edu. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 10 months ago by Erik Corry

Modified:
6 years, 11 months ago

Reviewers:
Lasse Reichstein

CC:
v8-dev

Base URL:
http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/

Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix regexp bug reported on iit.edu. Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=2235

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Total comments: 1

Created: 8 years, 10 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

		Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats (+37 lines, -3 lines)			Patch
	M	src/jsregexp.cc	View	1	2 chunks	+6 lines, -3 lines	1 comment	Download
	A	test/mjsunit/regexp-captures.js	View		1 chunk	+31 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages

Lasse Reichstein

8 years, 10 months ago (2009-06-22 12:32:48 UTC) #3

LGTM

http://codereview.chromium.org/141042/diff/6/1004
File src/jsregexp.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/141042/diff/6/1004#newcode408
Line 408: (IrregexpNumberOfCaptures(FixedArray::cast(jsregexp->data())) + 1) * 2
:
Seems this have different meanings for the two implementations.
For native irregexp, it really is number of *capture* registers, but for the
interpreter it is number of registers total.
How about moving it into the branches of the conditional, so each branch can
have its own code (and properly named variables).

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages