Index: util/mach/mach_message_server_test.cc |
diff --git a/util/mach/mach_message_server_test.cc b/util/mach/mach_message_server_test.cc |
index daa64a93dc90bef0f945250d68460df624234c4e..a59554b39fef537902f6a8c99c4843800cd4423a 100644 |
--- a/util/mach/mach_message_server_test.cc |
+++ b/util/mach/mach_message_server_test.cc |
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ class TestMachMessageServer : public MachMessageServer::Interface, |
MACH_MSGH_BITS(MACH_MSG_TYPE_MOVE_SEND, MACH_MSG_TYPE_MOVE_SEND) | |
(options_.client_send_complex ? MACH_MSGH_BITS_COMPLEX : 0); |
EXPECT_EQ(expect_msgh_bits, request->header.msgh_bits); |
- EXPECT_EQ(options_.client_send_large ? sizeof(LargeRequestMessage) : |
- sizeof(RequestMessage), |
+ EXPECT_EQ(options_.client_send_large ? sizeof(LargeRequestMessage) |
+ : sizeof(RequestMessage), |
request->header.msgh_size); |
if (options_.client_reply_port_type == Options::kReplyPortNormal) { |
EXPECT_EQ(RemotePort(), request->header.msgh_remote_port); |
@@ -277,8 +277,8 @@ class TestMachMessageServer : public MachMessageServer::Interface, |
std::set<mach_msg_id_t> MachMessageServerRequestIDs() override { |
const mach_msg_id_t request_ids[] = {kRequestMessageID}; |
- return std::set<mach_msg_id_t>( |
- &request_ids[0], &request_ids[arraysize(request_ids)]); |
+ return std::set<mach_msg_id_t>(&request_ids[0], |
+ &request_ids[arraysize(request_ids)]); |
} |
mach_msg_size_t MachMessageServerRequestSize() override { |
@@ -368,8 +368,8 @@ class TestMachMessageServer : public MachMessageServer::Interface, |
EXPECT_EQ(MACH_PORT_TYPE_SEND, type); |
// Destroy the resources here. |
- kr = mach_port_deallocate( |
- mach_task_self(), parent_complex_message_port_); |
+ kr = mach_port_deallocate(mach_task_self(), |
+ parent_complex_message_port_); |
EXPECT_EQ(KERN_SUCCESS, kr) |
<< MachErrorMessage(kr, "mach_port_deallocate"); |
} |
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ class TestMachMessageServer : public MachMessageServer::Interface, |
// this task so soon. It’s possible that something else in this task could |
// have reused the name, but it’s unlikely for that to have happened in |
// this test environment. |
- kr = mach_port_type( |
- mach_task_self(), parent_complex_message_port_, &type); |
+ kr = |
+ mach_port_type(mach_task_self(), parent_complex_message_port_, &type); |
EXPECT_EQ(KERN_INVALID_NAME, kr) |
<< MachErrorMessage(kr, "mach_port_type"); |
} |