| Index: test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py
|
| diff --git a/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py b/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py
|
| index f1335484c51f1d61563e82a8176a5b33a560144f..7d1c5285f354c485c9dd56acb26073851b8872e7 100644
|
| --- a/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py
|
| +++ b/test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py
|
| @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ def run_analyzer4(*args, **kw):
|
| test.run_gyp('test4.gyp', *args, **kw)
|
|
|
|
|
| -def EnsureContains(targets=set(), matched=False, build_targets=set()):
|
| - """Verifies output contains |targets|."""
|
| +def EnsureContains(matched=False, build_targets=set()):
|
| + """Verifies output contains |build_targets|."""
|
| result = _ReadOutputFileContents()
|
| if result.get('error', None):
|
| print 'unexpected error', result.get('error')
|
| @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ def EnsureContains(targets=set(), matched=False, build_targets=set()):
|
| print 'unexpected invalid_targets', result.get('invalid_targets')
|
| test.fail_test()
|
|
|
| + # TODO(sky): nuke when get rid of targets.
|
| + targets = build_targets
|
| actual_targets = set(result['targets'])
|
| if actual_targets != targets:
|
| print 'actual targets:', actual_targets, '\nexpected targets:', targets
|
| @@ -148,7 +150,7 @@ def EnsureInvalidTargets(expected_invalid_targets):
|
| # Two targets, A and B (both static_libraries) and A depends upon B. If a file
|
| # in B changes, then both A and B are output. It is not strictly necessary that
|
| # A is compiled in this case, only B.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['b.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['b.c'], ['a'])
|
| test.run_gyp('static_library_test.gyp', *CommonArgs())
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a' ,'b'})
|
|
|
| @@ -162,7 +164,7 @@ test.run_gyp('test.gyp', '-Gconfig_path=bogus_file',
|
| EnsureError('Unable to open file bogus_file')
|
|
|
| # Verify 'invalid_targets' is present when bad target is specified.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['bad_target'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['bad_target', 'all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureInvalidTargets({'bad_target'})
|
|
|
| @@ -172,110 +174,109 @@ run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureError('Unable to parse config file test_file')
|
|
|
| # Trivial test of a source.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Conditional source that is excluded.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=False)
|
|
|
| # Conditional source that is included by way of argument.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer('-Dtest_variable=1')
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Two unknown files.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'unoknow2.cc'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'unoknow2.cc'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains()
|
|
|
| # Two unknown files.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_sourcex.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_sourcex.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains()
|
|
|
| # Included dependency
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_source.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| # Included inputs to actions.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['action_input.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['action_input.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Don't consider outputs.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['action_output.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['action_output.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=False)
|
|
|
| # Rule inputs.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['rule_input.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['rule_input.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Ignore path specified with PRODUCT_DIR.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['product_dir_input.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['product_dir_input.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=False)
|
|
|
| # Path specified via a variable.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source2.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source2.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Verifies paths with // are fixed up correctly.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['parent_source.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['parent_source.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| # Verifies relative paths are resolved correctly.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source.h'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source.h'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Verifies relative paths in inputs are resolved correctly.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['rel_path1.h'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['rel_path1.h'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Various permutations when passing in targets.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe', 'exe3'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'],
|
| + ['exe', 'exe3', 'all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe3'}, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'],
|
| + ['exe', 'all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| # Verifies duplicates are ignored.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe', 'exe'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'],
|
| + ['exe', 'exe', 'all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['exe'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['exe', 'all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c', 'exe2.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c', 'exe2.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe3'])
|
| -run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe3'}, build_targets={'exe3'})
|
| -
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe3', 'all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe3'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], ['all', 'exe2'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| @@ -283,21 +284,20 @@ EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
| # are included.
|
| _CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/d.cc'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer2()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo'}, build_targets={'exe'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| _CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.includes.gypi'],
|
| ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer2()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo'}, build_targets={'exe'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| _CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.gyp'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer2()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo'}, build_targets={'exe'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| _CreateConfigFile(['test2.includes.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer2()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'},
|
| - build_targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| # Verify modifying a file included makes all targets dirty.
|
| _CreateConfigFile(['common.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| @@ -305,64 +305,64 @@ run_analyzer2('-Icommon.gypi')
|
| EnsureMatchedAll({'exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| # Assertions from test3.gyp.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['d.c', 'f.c'], ['a'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c', 'f.c'], ['a', 'all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['c.c', 'e.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['c.c', 'e.c'], ['all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'e'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b', 'all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b', 'all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'b'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'b', 'all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a', 'b'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['all'])
|
| run_analyzer3()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
|
|
| # Assertions around test4.gyp.
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a', 'e', 'h'])
|
| run_analyzer4()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'e', 'f'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'e', 'h'])
|
| run_analyzer4()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateConfigFile(['i.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['i.c'], ['a', 'e', 'h'])
|
| run_analyzer4()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'h', 'i'})
|
|
|
|
|