Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(112)

Unified Diff: tools/clang/plugins/FindBadConstructsConsumer.cpp

Issue 1385193002: Bisect clang Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git@master
Patch Set: 246985 Created 5 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « tools/clang/plugins/FindBadConstructsConsumer.h ('k') | tools/clang/plugins/OWNERS » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: tools/clang/plugins/FindBadConstructsConsumer.cpp
diff --git a/tools/clang/plugins/FindBadConstructsConsumer.cpp b/tools/clang/plugins/FindBadConstructsConsumer.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c99c389879270d6e0283e0c2c5c503218c77b52f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/clang/plugins/FindBadConstructsConsumer.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,875 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "FindBadConstructsConsumer.h"
+
+#include "clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Attr.h"
+#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+
+using namespace clang;
+
+namespace chrome_checker {
+
+namespace {
+
+const char kMethodRequiresOverride[] =
+ "[chromium-style] Overriding method must be marked with 'override' or "
+ "'final'.";
+const char kRedundantVirtualSpecifier[] =
+ "[chromium-style] %0 is redundant; %1 implies %0.";
+// http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21051 has been filed to make this a
+// Clang warning.
+const char kBaseMethodVirtualAndFinal[] =
+ "[chromium-style] The virtual method does not override anything and is "
+ "final; consider making it non-virtual.";
+const char kNoExplicitDtor[] =
+ "[chromium-style] Classes that are ref-counted should have explicit "
+ "destructors that are declared protected or private.";
+const char kPublicDtor[] =
+ "[chromium-style] Classes that are ref-counted should have "
+ "destructors that are declared protected or private.";
+const char kProtectedNonVirtualDtor[] =
+ "[chromium-style] Classes that are ref-counted and have non-private "
+ "destructors should declare their destructor virtual.";
+const char kWeakPtrFactoryOrder[] =
+ "[chromium-style] WeakPtrFactory members which refer to their outer class "
+ "must be the last member in the outer class definition.";
+const char kBadLastEnumValue[] =
+ "[chromium-style] _LAST/Last constants of enum types must have the maximal "
+ "value for any constant of that type.";
+const char kNoteInheritance[] = "[chromium-style] %0 inherits from %1 here";
+const char kNoteImplicitDtor[] =
+ "[chromium-style] No explicit destructor for %0 defined";
+const char kNotePublicDtor[] =
+ "[chromium-style] Public destructor declared here";
+const char kNoteProtectedNonVirtualDtor[] =
+ "[chromium-style] Protected non-virtual destructor declared here";
+
+bool TypeHasNonTrivialDtor(const Type* type) {
+ if (const CXXRecordDecl* cxx_r = type->getPointeeCXXRecordDecl())
+ return !cxx_r->hasTrivialDestructor();
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+// Returns the underlying Type for |type| by expanding typedefs and removing
+// any namespace qualifiers. This is similar to desugaring, except that for
+// ElaboratedTypes, desugar will unwrap too much.
+const Type* UnwrapType(const Type* type) {
+ if (const ElaboratedType* elaborated = dyn_cast<ElaboratedType>(type))
+ return UnwrapType(elaborated->getNamedType().getTypePtr());
+ if (const TypedefType* typedefed = dyn_cast<TypedefType>(type))
+ return UnwrapType(typedefed->desugar().getTypePtr());
+ return type;
+}
+
+bool IsGtestTestFixture(const CXXRecordDecl* decl) {
+ return decl->getQualifiedNameAsString() == "testing::Test";
+}
+
+// Generates a fixit hint to remove the 'virtual' keyword.
+// Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a good way to determine the source
+// location of the 'virtual' keyword. It's available in Declarator, but that
+// isn't accessible from the AST. So instead, make an educated guess that the
+// first token is probably the virtual keyword. Strictly speaking, this doesn't
+// have to be true, but it probably will be.
+// TODO(dcheng): Add a warning to force virtual to always appear first ;-)
+FixItHint FixItRemovalForVirtual(const SourceManager& manager,
+ const LangOptions& lang_opts,
+ const CXXMethodDecl* method) {
+ SourceRange range(method->getLocStart());
+ // Get the spelling loc just in case it was expanded from a macro.
+ SourceRange spelling_range(manager.getSpellingLoc(range.getBegin()));
+ // Sanity check that the text looks like virtual.
+ StringRef text = clang::Lexer::getSourceText(
+ CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(spelling_range), manager, lang_opts);
+ if (text.trim() != "virtual")
+ return FixItHint();
+ return FixItHint::CreateRemoval(range);
+}
+
+bool IsPodOrTemplateType(const CXXRecordDecl& record) {
+ return record.isPOD() ||
+ record.getDescribedClassTemplate() ||
+ record.getTemplateSpecializationKind() ||
+ record.isDependentType();
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
+FindBadConstructsConsumer::FindBadConstructsConsumer(CompilerInstance& instance,
+ const Options& options)
+ : ChromeClassTester(instance, options) {
+ // Messages for virtual method specifiers.
+ diag_method_requires_override_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kMethodRequiresOverride);
+ diag_redundant_virtual_specifier_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kRedundantVirtualSpecifier);
+ diag_base_method_virtual_and_final_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kBaseMethodVirtualAndFinal);
+
+ // Messages for destructors.
+ diag_no_explicit_dtor_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kNoExplicitDtor);
+ diag_public_dtor_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kPublicDtor);
+ diag_protected_non_virtual_dtor_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kProtectedNonVirtualDtor);
+
+ // Miscellaneous messages.
+ diag_weak_ptr_factory_order_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kWeakPtrFactoryOrder);
+ diag_bad_enum_last_value_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(getErrorLevel(), kBadLastEnumValue);
+
+ // Registers notes to make it easier to interpret warnings.
+ diag_note_inheritance_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(DiagnosticsEngine::Note, kNoteInheritance);
+ diag_note_implicit_dtor_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(DiagnosticsEngine::Note, kNoteImplicitDtor);
+ diag_note_public_dtor_ =
+ diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(DiagnosticsEngine::Note, kNotePublicDtor);
+ diag_note_protected_non_virtual_dtor_ = diagnostic().getCustomDiagID(
+ DiagnosticsEngine::Note, kNoteProtectedNonVirtualDtor);
+}
+
+bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::VisitDecl(clang::Decl* decl) {
+ clang::TagDecl* tag_decl = dyn_cast<clang::TagDecl>(decl);
+ if (tag_decl && tag_decl->isCompleteDefinition())
+ CheckTag(tag_decl);
+ return true;
+}
+
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckChromeClass(SourceLocation record_location,
+ CXXRecordDecl* record) {
+ // By default, the clang checker doesn't check some types (templates, etc).
+ // That was only a mistake; once Chromium code passes these checks, we should
+ // remove the "check-templates" option and remove this code.
+ // See crbug.com/441916
+ if (!options_.check_templates && IsPodOrTemplateType(*record))
+ return;
+
+ bool implementation_file = InImplementationFile(record_location);
+
+ if (!implementation_file) {
+ // Only check for "heavy" constructors/destructors in header files;
+ // within implementation files, there is no performance cost.
+
+ // If this is a POD or a class template or a type dependent on a
+ // templated class, assume there's no ctor/dtor/virtual method
+ // optimization that we should do.
+ if (!IsPodOrTemplateType(*record))
+ CheckCtorDtorWeight(record_location, record);
+ }
+
+ bool warn_on_inline_bodies = !implementation_file;
+ // Check that all virtual methods are annotated with override or final.
+ // Note this could also apply to templates, but for some reason Clang
+ // does not always see the "override", so we get false positives.
+ // See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18440 and
+ // http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21942
+ if (!IsPodOrTemplateType(*record))
+ CheckVirtualMethods(record_location, record, warn_on_inline_bodies);
+
+ CheckRefCountedDtors(record_location, record);
+
+ CheckWeakPtrFactoryMembers(record_location, record);
+}
+
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckChromeEnum(SourceLocation enum_location,
+ EnumDecl* enum_decl) {
+ if (!options_.check_enum_last_value)
+ return;
+
+ bool got_one = false;
+ bool is_signed = false;
+ llvm::APSInt max_so_far;
+ EnumDecl::enumerator_iterator iter;
+ for (iter = enum_decl->enumerator_begin();
+ iter != enum_decl->enumerator_end();
+ ++iter) {
+ llvm::APSInt current_value = iter->getInitVal();
+ if (!got_one) {
+ max_so_far = current_value;
+ is_signed = current_value.isSigned();
+ got_one = true;
+ } else {
+ if (is_signed != current_value.isSigned()) {
+ // This only happens in some cases when compiling C (not C++) files,
+ // so it is OK to bail out here.
+ return;
+ }
+ if (current_value > max_so_far)
+ max_so_far = current_value;
+ }
+ }
+ for (iter = enum_decl->enumerator_begin();
+ iter != enum_decl->enumerator_end();
+ ++iter) {
+ std::string name = iter->getNameAsString();
+ if (((name.size() > 4 && name.compare(name.size() - 4, 4, "Last") == 0) ||
+ (name.size() > 5 && name.compare(name.size() - 5, 5, "_LAST") == 0)) &&
+ iter->getInitVal() < max_so_far) {
+ diagnostic().Report(iter->getLocation(), diag_bad_enum_last_value_);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckCtorDtorWeight(
+ SourceLocation record_location,
+ CXXRecordDecl* record) {
+ // We don't handle anonymous structs. If this record doesn't have a
+ // name, it's of the form:
+ //
+ // struct {
+ // ...
+ // } name_;
+ if (record->getIdentifier() == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ // Count the number of templated base classes as a feature of whether the
+ // destructor can be inlined.
+ int templated_base_classes = 0;
+ for (CXXRecordDecl::base_class_const_iterator it = record->bases_begin();
+ it != record->bases_end();
+ ++it) {
+ if (it->getTypeSourceInfo()->getTypeLoc().getTypeLocClass() ==
+ TypeLoc::TemplateSpecialization) {
+ ++templated_base_classes;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Count the number of trivial and non-trivial member variables.
+ int trivial_member = 0;
+ int non_trivial_member = 0;
+ int templated_non_trivial_member = 0;
+ for (RecordDecl::field_iterator it = record->field_begin();
+ it != record->field_end();
+ ++it) {
+ CountType(it->getType().getTypePtr(),
+ &trivial_member,
+ &non_trivial_member,
+ &templated_non_trivial_member);
+ }
+
+ // Check to see if we need to ban inlined/synthesized constructors. Note
+ // that the cutoffs here are kind of arbitrary. Scores over 10 break.
+ int dtor_score = 0;
+ // Deriving from a templated base class shouldn't be enough to trigger
+ // the ctor warning, but if you do *anything* else, it should.
+ //
+ // TODO(erg): This is motivated by templated base classes that don't have
+ // any data members. Somehow detect when templated base classes have data
+ // members and treat them differently.
+ dtor_score += templated_base_classes * 9;
+ // Instantiating a template is an insta-hit.
+ dtor_score += templated_non_trivial_member * 10;
+ // The fourth normal class member should trigger the warning.
+ dtor_score += non_trivial_member * 3;
+
+ int ctor_score = dtor_score;
+ // You should be able to have 9 ints before we warn you.
+ ctor_score += trivial_member;
+
+ if (ctor_score >= 10) {
+ if (!record->hasUserDeclaredConstructor()) {
+ emitWarning(record_location,
+ "Complex class/struct needs an explicit out-of-line "
+ "constructor.");
+ } else {
+ // Iterate across all the constructors in this file and yell if we
+ // find one that tries to be inline.
+ for (CXXRecordDecl::ctor_iterator it = record->ctor_begin();
+ it != record->ctor_end();
+ ++it) {
+ // The current check is buggy. An implicit copy constructor does not
+ // have an inline body, so this check never fires for classes with a
+ // user-declared out-of-line constructor.
+ if (it->hasInlineBody()) {
+ if (it->isCopyConstructor() &&
+ !record->hasUserDeclaredCopyConstructor()) {
+ // In general, implicit constructors are generated on demand. But
+ // in the Windows component build, dllexport causes instantiation of
+ // the copy constructor which means that this fires on many more
+ // classes. For now, suppress this on dllexported classes.
+ // (This does mean that windows component builds will not emit this
+ // warning in some cases where it is emitted in other configs, but
+ // that's the better tradeoff at this point).
+ // TODO(dcheng): With the RecursiveASTVisitor, these warnings might
+ // be emitted on other platforms too, reevaluate if we want to keep
+ // surpressing this then http://crbug.com/467288
+ if (!record->hasAttr<DLLExportAttr>())
+ emitWarning(record_location,
+ "Complex class/struct needs an explicit out-of-line "
+ "copy constructor.");
+ } else {
+ // See the comment in the previous branch about copy constructors.
+ // This does the same for implicit move constructors.
+ bool is_likely_compiler_generated_dllexport_move_ctor =
+ it->isMoveConstructor() &&
+ !record->hasUserDeclaredMoveConstructor() &&
+ record->hasAttr<DLLExportAttr>();
+ if (!is_likely_compiler_generated_dllexport_move_ctor)
+ emitWarning(it->getInnerLocStart(),
+ "Complex constructor has an inlined body.");
+ }
+ } else if (it->isInlined() && !it->isInlineSpecified() &&
+ !it->isDeleted() && (!it->isCopyOrMoveConstructor() ||
+ it->isExplicitlyDefaulted())) {
+ // isInlined() is a more reliable check than hasInlineBody(), but
+ // unfortunately, it results in warnings for implicit copy/move
+ // constructors in the previously mentioned situation. To preserve
+ // compatibility with existing Chromium code, only warn if it's an
+ // explicitly defaulted copy or move constructor.
+ emitWarning(it->getInnerLocStart(),
+ "Complex constructor has an inlined body.");
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // The destructor side is equivalent except that we don't check for
+ // trivial members; 20 ints don't need a destructor.
+ if (dtor_score >= 10 && !record->hasTrivialDestructor()) {
+ if (!record->hasUserDeclaredDestructor()) {
+ emitWarning(record_location,
+ "Complex class/struct needs an explicit out-of-line "
+ "destructor.");
+ } else if (CXXDestructorDecl* dtor = record->getDestructor()) {
+ if (dtor->isInlined() && !dtor->isInlineSpecified() &&
+ !dtor->isDeleted()) {
+ emitWarning(dtor->getInnerLocStart(),
+ "Complex destructor has an inline body.");
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::InTestingNamespace(const Decl* record) {
+ return GetNamespace(record).find("testing") != std::string::npos;
+}
+
+bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::IsMethodInBannedOrTestingNamespace(
+ const CXXMethodDecl* method) {
+ if (InBannedNamespace(method))
+ return true;
+ for (CXXMethodDecl::method_iterator i = method->begin_overridden_methods();
+ i != method->end_overridden_methods();
+ ++i) {
+ const CXXMethodDecl* overridden = *i;
+ if (IsMethodInBannedOrTestingNamespace(overridden) ||
+ // Provide an exception for ::testing::Test. gtest itself uses some
+ // magic to try to make sure SetUp()/TearDown() aren't capitalized
+ // incorrectly, but having the plugin enforce override is also nice.
+ (InTestingNamespace(overridden) &&
+ !IsGtestTestFixture(overridden->getParent()))) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+SuppressibleDiagnosticBuilder
+FindBadConstructsConsumer::ReportIfSpellingLocNotIgnored(
+ SourceLocation loc,
+ unsigned diagnostic_id) {
+ return SuppressibleDiagnosticBuilder(
+ &diagnostic(), loc, diagnostic_id,
+ InBannedDirectory(instance().getSourceManager().getSpellingLoc(loc)));
+}
+
+// Checks that virtual methods are correctly annotated, and have no body in a
+// header file.
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckVirtualMethods(
+ SourceLocation record_location,
+ CXXRecordDecl* record,
+ bool warn_on_inline_bodies) {
+ // Gmock objects trigger these for each MOCK_BLAH() macro used. So we have a
+ // trick to get around that. If a class has member variables whose types are
+ // in the "testing" namespace (which is how gmock works behind the scenes),
+ // there's a really high chance we won't care about these errors
+ for (CXXRecordDecl::field_iterator it = record->field_begin();
+ it != record->field_end();
+ ++it) {
+ CXXRecordDecl* record_type = it->getTypeSourceInfo()
+ ->getTypeLoc()
+ .getTypePtr()
+ ->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ if (record_type) {
+ if (InTestingNamespace(record_type)) {
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (CXXRecordDecl::method_iterator it = record->method_begin();
+ it != record->method_end();
+ ++it) {
+ if (it->isCopyAssignmentOperator() || isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(*it)) {
+ // Ignore constructors and assignment operators.
+ } else if (isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(*it) &&
+ !record->hasUserDeclaredDestructor()) {
+ // Ignore non-user-declared destructors.
+ } else if (!it->isVirtual()) {
+ continue;
+ } else {
+ CheckVirtualSpecifiers(*it);
+ if (warn_on_inline_bodies)
+ CheckVirtualBodies(*it);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// Makes sure that virtual methods use the most appropriate specifier. If a
+// virtual method overrides a method from a base class, only the override
+// specifier should be used. If the method should not be overridden by derived
+// classes, only the final specifier should be used.
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckVirtualSpecifiers(
+ const CXXMethodDecl* method) {
+ bool is_override = method->size_overridden_methods() > 0;
+ bool has_virtual = method->isVirtualAsWritten();
+ OverrideAttr* override_attr = method->getAttr<OverrideAttr>();
+ FinalAttr* final_attr = method->getAttr<FinalAttr>();
+
+ if (IsMethodInBannedOrTestingNamespace(method))
+ return;
+
+ SourceManager& manager = instance().getSourceManager();
+ const LangOptions& lang_opts = instance().getLangOpts();
+
+ // Complain if a method is annotated virtual && (override || final).
+ if (has_virtual && (override_attr || final_attr)) {
+ // ... but only if virtual does not originate in a macro from a banned file.
+ // Note this is just an educated guess: the assumption here is that any
+ // macro for declaring methods will probably be at the start of the method's
+ // source range.
+ ReportIfSpellingLocNotIgnored(method->getLocStart(),
+ diag_redundant_virtual_specifier_)
+ << "'virtual'"
+ << (override_attr ? static_cast<Attr*>(override_attr) : final_attr)
+ << FixItRemovalForVirtual(manager, lang_opts, method);
+ }
+
+ // Complain if a method is an override and is not annotated with override or
+ // final.
+ if (is_override && !override_attr && !final_attr) {
+ SourceRange range = method->getSourceRange();
+ SourceLocation loc;
+ if (method->hasInlineBody()) {
+ loc = method->getBody()->getSourceRange().getBegin();
+ } else {
+ loc = Lexer::getLocForEndOfToken(manager.getSpellingLoc(range.getEnd()),
+ 0, manager, lang_opts);
+ // The original code used the ending source loc of TypeSourceInfo's
+ // TypeLoc. Unfortunately, this breaks down in the presence of attributes.
+ // Attributes often appear at the end of a TypeLoc, e.g.
+ // virtual ULONG __stdcall AddRef()
+ // has a TypeSourceInfo that looks something like:
+ // ULONG AddRef() __attribute(stdcall)
+ // so a fix-it insertion would be generated to insert 'override' after
+ // __stdcall in the code as written.
+ // While using the spelling loc of the CXXMethodDecl fixes attribute
+ // handling, it breaks handling of "= 0" and similar constructs.. To work
+ // around this, scan backwards in the source text for a '=' or ')' token
+ // and adjust the location as needed...
+ for (SourceLocation l = loc.getLocWithOffset(-1);
+ l != manager.getLocForStartOfFile(manager.getFileID(loc));
+ l = l.getLocWithOffset(-1)) {
+ l = Lexer::GetBeginningOfToken(l, manager, lang_opts);
+ Token token;
+ // getRawToken() returns *true* on failure. In that case, just give up
+ // and don't bother generating a possibly incorrect fix-it.
+ if (Lexer::getRawToken(l, token, manager, lang_opts, true)) {
+ loc = SourceLocation();
+ break;
+ }
+ if (token.is(tok::r_paren)) {
+ break;
+ } else if (token.is(tok::equal)) {
+ loc = l;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ // Again, only emit the warning if it doesn't originate from a macro in
+ // a system header.
+ if (loc.isValid()) {
+ ReportIfSpellingLocNotIgnored(loc, diag_method_requires_override_)
+ << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(loc, " override");
+ } else {
+ ReportIfSpellingLocNotIgnored(range.getBegin(),
+ diag_method_requires_override_);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (final_attr && override_attr) {
+ ReportIfSpellingLocNotIgnored(override_attr->getLocation(),
+ diag_redundant_virtual_specifier_)
+ << override_attr << final_attr
+ << FixItHint::CreateRemoval(override_attr->getRange());
+ }
+
+ if (final_attr && !is_override) {
+ ReportIfSpellingLocNotIgnored(method->getLocStart(),
+ diag_base_method_virtual_and_final_)
+ << FixItRemovalForVirtual(manager, lang_opts, method)
+ << FixItHint::CreateRemoval(final_attr->getRange());
+ }
+}
+
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckVirtualBodies(
+ const CXXMethodDecl* method) {
+ // Virtual methods should not have inline definitions beyond "{}". This
+ // only matters for header files.
+ if (method->hasBody() && method->hasInlineBody()) {
+ if (CompoundStmt* cs = dyn_cast<CompoundStmt>(method->getBody())) {
+ if (cs->size()) {
+ SourceLocation loc = cs->getLBracLoc();
+ // CR_BEGIN_MSG_MAP_EX and BEGIN_SAFE_MSG_MAP_EX try to be compatible
+ // to BEGIN_MSG_MAP(_EX). So even though they are in chrome code,
+ // we can't easily fix them, so explicitly whitelist them here.
+ bool emit = true;
+ if (loc.isMacroID()) {
+ SourceManager& manager = instance().getSourceManager();
+ if (InBannedDirectory(manager.getSpellingLoc(loc)))
+ emit = false;
+ else {
+ StringRef name = Lexer::getImmediateMacroName(
+ loc, manager, instance().getLangOpts());
+ if (name == "CR_BEGIN_MSG_MAP_EX" ||
+ name == "BEGIN_SAFE_MSG_MAP_EX")
+ emit = false;
+ }
+ }
+ if (emit)
+ emitWarning(loc,
+ "virtual methods with non-empty bodies shouldn't be "
+ "declared inline.");
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CountType(const Type* type,
+ int* trivial_member,
+ int* non_trivial_member,
+ int* templated_non_trivial_member) {
+ switch (type->getTypeClass()) {
+ case Type::Record: {
+ // Simplifying; the whole class isn't trivial if the dtor is, but
+ // we use this as a signal about complexity.
+ if (TypeHasNonTrivialDtor(type))
+ (*trivial_member)++;
+ else
+ (*non_trivial_member)++;
+ break;
+ }
+ case Type::TemplateSpecialization: {
+ TemplateName name =
+ dyn_cast<TemplateSpecializationType>(type)->getTemplateName();
+ bool whitelisted_template = false;
+
+ // HACK: I'm at a loss about how to get the syntax checker to get
+ // whether a template is externed or not. For the first pass here,
+ // just do retarded string comparisons.
+ if (TemplateDecl* decl = name.getAsTemplateDecl()) {
+ std::string base_name = decl->getNameAsString();
+ if (base_name == "basic_string")
+ whitelisted_template = true;
+ }
+
+ if (whitelisted_template)
+ (*non_trivial_member)++;
+ else
+ (*templated_non_trivial_member)++;
+ break;
+ }
+ case Type::Elaborated: {
+ CountType(dyn_cast<ElaboratedType>(type)->getNamedType().getTypePtr(),
+ trivial_member,
+ non_trivial_member,
+ templated_non_trivial_member);
+ break;
+ }
+ case Type::Typedef: {
+ while (const TypedefType* TT = dyn_cast<TypedefType>(type)) {
+ type = TT->getDecl()->getUnderlyingType().getTypePtr();
+ }
+ CountType(type,
+ trivial_member,
+ non_trivial_member,
+ templated_non_trivial_member);
+ break;
+ }
+ default: {
+ // Stupid assumption: anything we see that isn't the above is one of
+ // the 20 integer types.
+ (*trivial_member)++;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// Check |record| for issues that are problematic for ref-counted types.
+// Note that |record| may not be a ref-counted type, but a base class for
+// a type that is.
+// If there are issues, update |loc| with the SourceLocation of the issue
+// and returns appropriately, or returns None if there are no issues.
+// static
+FindBadConstructsConsumer::RefcountIssue
+FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckRecordForRefcountIssue(
+ const CXXRecordDecl* record,
+ SourceLocation& loc) {
+ if (!record->hasUserDeclaredDestructor()) {
+ loc = record->getLocation();
+ return ImplicitDestructor;
+ }
+
+ if (CXXDestructorDecl* dtor = record->getDestructor()) {
+ if (dtor->getAccess() == AS_public) {
+ loc = dtor->getInnerLocStart();
+ return PublicDestructor;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return None;
+}
+
+// Returns true if |base| specifies one of the Chromium reference counted
+// classes (base::RefCounted / base::RefCountedThreadSafe).
+bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::IsRefCounted(
+ const CXXBaseSpecifier* base,
+ CXXBasePath& path) {
+ FindBadConstructsConsumer* self = this;
+ const TemplateSpecializationType* base_type =
+ dyn_cast<TemplateSpecializationType>(
+ UnwrapType(base->getType().getTypePtr()));
+ if (!base_type) {
+ // Base-most definition is not a template, so this cannot derive from
+ // base::RefCounted. However, it may still be possible to use with a
+ // scoped_refptr<> and support ref-counting, so this is not a perfect
+ // guarantee of safety.
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ TemplateName name = base_type->getTemplateName();
+ if (TemplateDecl* decl = name.getAsTemplateDecl()) {
+ std::string base_name = decl->getNameAsString();
+
+ // Check for both base::RefCounted and base::RefCountedThreadSafe.
+ if (base_name.compare(0, 10, "RefCounted") == 0 &&
+ self->GetNamespace(decl) == "base") {
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+// Returns true if |base| specifies a class that has a public destructor,
+// either explicitly or implicitly.
+// static
+bool FindBadConstructsConsumer::HasPublicDtorCallback(
+ const CXXBaseSpecifier* base,
+ CXXBasePath& path,
+ void* user_data) {
+ // Only examine paths that have public inheritance, as they are the
+ // only ones which will result in the destructor potentially being
+ // exposed. This check is largely redundant, as Chromium code should be
+ // exclusively using public inheritance.
+ if (path.Access != AS_public)
+ return false;
+
+ CXXRecordDecl* record =
+ dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(base->getType()->getAs<RecordType>()->getDecl());
+ SourceLocation unused;
+ return None != CheckRecordForRefcountIssue(record, unused);
+}
+
+// Outputs a C++ inheritance chain as a diagnostic aid.
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::PrintInheritanceChain(const CXXBasePath& path) {
+ for (CXXBasePath::const_iterator it = path.begin(); it != path.end(); ++it) {
+ diagnostic().Report(it->Base->getLocStart(), diag_note_inheritance_)
+ << it->Class << it->Base->getType();
+ }
+}
+
+unsigned FindBadConstructsConsumer::DiagnosticForIssue(RefcountIssue issue) {
+ switch (issue) {
+ case ImplicitDestructor:
+ return diag_no_explicit_dtor_;
+ case PublicDestructor:
+ return diag_public_dtor_;
+ case None:
+ assert(false && "Do not call DiagnosticForIssue with issue None");
+ return 0;
+ }
+ assert(false);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+// Check |record| to determine if it has any problematic refcounting
+// issues and, if so, print them as warnings/errors based on the current
+// value of getErrorLevel().
+//
+// If |record| is a C++ class, and if it inherits from one of the Chromium
+// ref-counting classes (base::RefCounted / base::RefCountedThreadSafe),
+// ensure that there are no public destructors in the class hierarchy. This
+// is to guard against accidentally stack-allocating a RefCounted class or
+// sticking it in a non-ref-counted container (like scoped_ptr<>).
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckRefCountedDtors(
+ SourceLocation record_location,
+ CXXRecordDecl* record) {
+ // Skip anonymous structs.
+ if (record->getIdentifier() == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ // Determine if the current type is even ref-counted.
+ CXXBasePaths refcounted_path;
+ if (!record->lookupInBases(
+ [this](const CXXBaseSpecifier* base, CXXBasePath& path) {
+ return IsRefCounted(base, path);
+ },
+ refcounted_path)) {
+ return; // Class does not derive from a ref-counted base class.
+ }
+
+ // Easy check: Check to see if the current type is problematic.
+ SourceLocation loc;
+ RefcountIssue issue = CheckRecordForRefcountIssue(record, loc);
+ if (issue != None) {
+ diagnostic().Report(loc, DiagnosticForIssue(issue));
+ PrintInheritanceChain(refcounted_path.front());
+ return;
+ }
+ if (CXXDestructorDecl* dtor =
+ refcounted_path.begin()->back().Class->getDestructor()) {
+ if (dtor->getAccess() == AS_protected && !dtor->isVirtual()) {
+ loc = dtor->getInnerLocStart();
+ diagnostic().Report(loc, diag_protected_non_virtual_dtor_);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Long check: Check all possible base classes for problematic
+ // destructors. This checks for situations involving multiple
+ // inheritance, where the ref-counted class may be implementing an
+ // interface that has a public or implicit destructor.
+ //
+ // struct SomeInterface {
+ // virtual void DoFoo();
+ // };
+ //
+ // struct RefCountedInterface
+ // : public base::RefCounted<RefCountedInterface>,
+ // public SomeInterface {
+ // private:
+ // friend class base::Refcounted<RefCountedInterface>;
+ // virtual ~RefCountedInterface() {}
+ // };
+ //
+ // While RefCountedInterface is "safe", in that its destructor is
+ // private, it's possible to do the following "unsafe" code:
+ // scoped_refptr<RefCountedInterface> some_class(
+ // new RefCountedInterface);
+ // // Calls SomeInterface::~SomeInterface(), which is unsafe.
+ // delete static_cast<SomeInterface*>(some_class.get());
+ if (!options_.check_base_classes)
+ return;
+
+ // Find all public destructors. This will record the class hierarchy
+ // that leads to the public destructor in |dtor_paths|.
+ CXXBasePaths dtor_paths;
+ if (!record->lookupInBases(
+ [](const CXXBaseSpecifier* base, CXXBasePath& path) {
+ // TODO(thakis): Inline HasPublicDtorCallback() after clang roll.
+ return HasPublicDtorCallback(base, path, nullptr);
+ },
+ dtor_paths)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ for (CXXBasePaths::const_paths_iterator it = dtor_paths.begin();
+ it != dtor_paths.end();
+ ++it) {
+ // The record with the problem will always be the last record
+ // in the path, since it is the record that stopped the search.
+ const CXXRecordDecl* problem_record = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(
+ it->back().Base->getType()->getAs<RecordType>()->getDecl());
+
+ issue = CheckRecordForRefcountIssue(problem_record, loc);
+
+ if (issue == ImplicitDestructor) {
+ diagnostic().Report(record_location, diag_no_explicit_dtor_);
+ PrintInheritanceChain(refcounted_path.front());
+ diagnostic().Report(loc, diag_note_implicit_dtor_) << problem_record;
+ PrintInheritanceChain(*it);
+ } else if (issue == PublicDestructor) {
+ diagnostic().Report(record_location, diag_public_dtor_);
+ PrintInheritanceChain(refcounted_path.front());
+ diagnostic().Report(loc, diag_note_public_dtor_);
+ PrintInheritanceChain(*it);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// Check for any problems with WeakPtrFactory class members. This currently
+// only checks that any WeakPtrFactory<T> member of T appears as the last
+// data member in T. We could consider checking for bad uses of
+// WeakPtrFactory to refer to other data members, but that would require
+// looking at the initializer list in constructors to see what the factory
+// points to.
+// Note, if we later add other unrelated checks of data members, we should
+// consider collapsing them in to one loop to avoid iterating over the data
+// members more than once.
+void FindBadConstructsConsumer::CheckWeakPtrFactoryMembers(
+ SourceLocation record_location,
+ CXXRecordDecl* record) {
+ // Skip anonymous structs.
+ if (record->getIdentifier() == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ // Iterate through members of the class.
+ RecordDecl::field_iterator iter(record->field_begin()),
+ the_end(record->field_end());
+ SourceLocation weak_ptr_factory_location; // Invalid initially.
+ for (; iter != the_end; ++iter) {
+ const TemplateSpecializationType* template_spec_type =
+ iter->getType().getTypePtr()->getAs<TemplateSpecializationType>();
+ bool param_is_weak_ptr_factory_to_self = false;
+ if (template_spec_type) {
+ const TemplateDecl* template_decl =
+ template_spec_type->getTemplateName().getAsTemplateDecl();
+ if (template_decl && template_spec_type->getNumArgs() == 1) {
+ if (template_decl->getNameAsString().compare("WeakPtrFactory") == 0 &&
+ GetNamespace(template_decl) == "base") {
+ // Only consider WeakPtrFactory members which are specialized for the
+ // owning class.
+ const TemplateArgument& arg = template_spec_type->getArg(0);
+ if (arg.getAsType().getTypePtr()->getAsCXXRecordDecl() ==
+ record->getTypeForDecl()->getAsCXXRecordDecl()) {
+ if (!weak_ptr_factory_location.isValid()) {
+ // Save the first matching WeakPtrFactory member for the
+ // diagnostic.
+ weak_ptr_factory_location = iter->getLocation();
+ }
+ param_is_weak_ptr_factory_to_self = true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ // If we've already seen a WeakPtrFactory<OwningType> and this param is not
+ // one of those, it means there is at least one member after a factory.
+ if (weak_ptr_factory_location.isValid() &&
+ !param_is_weak_ptr_factory_to_self) {
+ diagnostic().Report(weak_ptr_factory_location,
+ diag_weak_ptr_factory_order_);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace chrome_checker
« no previous file with comments | « tools/clang/plugins/FindBadConstructsConsumer.h ('k') | tools/clang/plugins/OWNERS » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698