|
|
DescriptionChange HTMLAreaElement.idl to reflect changes in IDL as per spec
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/embedded-content.html#htmlareaelement
Committed: https://crrev.com/d1eee5bdec4e21fc7e0b376e00f4492a940bdbdb
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#356272}
Patch Set 1 #Patch Set 2 : ` #Patch Set 3 : #Patch Set 4 : #Patch Set 5 : Removing hreflang from IDL #
Total comments: 1
Patch Set 6 : #Patch Set 7 : #Messages
Total messages: 28 (6 generated)
tanay.c@samsung.com changed reviewers: + pdr@chromium.org, philipj@opera.com
PTAL
It looks like the hreflang attribute doesn't actually have any effect, even on HTMLAnchorElement, and the other engines don't have HTMLAreaElement.hreflang. I've filed a spec bug to remove the attribute instead: https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/232
On 2015/10/06 08:56:25, philipj wrote: > It looks like the hreflang attribute doesn't actually have any effect, even on > HTMLAnchorElement, and the other engines don't have HTMLAreaElement.hreflang. > > I've filed a spec bug to remove the attribute instead: > https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/232 I got it removed from the spec instead. If you want to update the comment in the IDL file to match the spec, that would be nice.
On 2015/10/07 15:01:07, philipj wrote: > On 2015/10/06 08:56:25, philipj wrote: > > It looks like the hreflang attribute doesn't actually have any effect, even on > > HTMLAnchorElement, and the other engines don't have HTMLAreaElement.hreflang. > > > > I've filed a spec bug to remove the attribute instead: > > https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/232 > > I got it removed from the spec instead. If you want to update the comment in the > IDL file to match the spec, that would be nice. Done. PTAL.
https://codereview.chromium.org/1381913002/diff/80001/third_party/WebKit/Sour... File third_party/WebKit/Source/core/html/HTMLAreaElement.idl (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/1381913002/diff/80001/third_party/WebKit/Sour... third_party/WebKit/Source/core/html/HTMLAreaElement.idl:30: // FIXME: download, rel, relList and type are missing. Please also remove type here and copy the comment from the spec: "// hreflang and type are not reflected"
On 2015/10/08 09:07:47, philipj wrote: > https://codereview.chromium.org/1381913002/diff/80001/third_party/WebKit/Sour... > File third_party/WebKit/Source/core/html/HTMLAreaElement.idl (right): > > https://codereview.chromium.org/1381913002/diff/80001/third_party/WebKit/Sour... > third_party/WebKit/Source/core/html/HTMLAreaElement.idl:30: // FIXME: download, > rel, relList and type are missing. > Please also remove type here and copy the comment from the spec: "// hreflang > and type are not reflected" PTAL
LGTM, and I've tweaked the description slightly. Note that the spec issue was reopened, so let's wait for 24 hours before landing this, just in case it's reverted.
On 2015/10/08 11:13:16, philipj wrote: > LGTM, and I've tweaked the description slightly. > > Note that the spec issue was reopened, so let's wait for 24 hours before landing > this, just in case it's reverted. Can this be landed?
On 2015/10/13 15:29:35, tanay.c wrote: > On 2015/10/08 11:13:16, philipj wrote: > > LGTM, and I've tweaked the description slightly. > > > > Note that the spec issue was reopened, so let's wait for 24 hours before > landing > > this, just in case it's reverted. > > Can this be landed? Please wait a little, the proposal I've made would actually change this again: https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/232#issuecomment-148727450
On 2015/10/16 14:09:51, philipj wrote: > On 2015/10/13 15:29:35, tanay.c wrote: > > On 2015/10/08 11:13:16, philipj wrote: > > > LGTM, and I've tweaked the description slightly. > > > > > > Note that the spec issue was reopened, so let's wait for 24 hours before > > landing > > > this, just in case it's reverted. > > > > Can this be landed? > > Please wait a little, the proposal I've made would actually change this again: > https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/232#issuecomment-148727450 OK, it's done, hreflang and type aren't mentioned in the IDL blocks at all any longer.
On 2015/10/20 13:05:56, philipj wrote: > On 2015/10/16 14:09:51, philipj wrote: > > On 2015/10/13 15:29:35, tanay.c wrote: > > > On 2015/10/08 11:13:16, philipj wrote: > > > > LGTM, and I've tweaked the description slightly. > > > > > > > > Note that the spec issue was reopened, so let's wait for 24 hours before > > > landing > > > > this, just in case it's reverted. > > > > > > Can this be landed? > > > > Please wait a little, the proposal I've made would actually change this again: > > https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/232#issuecomment-148727450 > > OK, it's done, hreflang and type aren't mentioned in the IDL blocks at all any > longer. Is it ok to land in current state. Or should I remove the comment from the idl completely?
On 2015/10/21 06:38:06, tanay.c wrote: > On 2015/10/20 13:05:56, philipj wrote: > > On 2015/10/16 14:09:51, philipj wrote: > > > On 2015/10/13 15:29:35, tanay.c wrote: > > > > On 2015/10/08 11:13:16, philipj wrote: > > > > > LGTM, and I've tweaked the description slightly. > > > > > > > > > > Note that the spec issue was reopened, so let's wait for 24 hours before > > > > landing > > > > > this, just in case it's reverted. > > > > > > > > Can this be landed? > > > > > > Please wait a little, the proposal I've made would actually change this > again: > > > https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/232#issuecomment-148727450 > > > > OK, it's done, hreflang and type aren't mentioned in the IDL blocks at all any > > longer. > > Is it ok to land in current state. Or should I remove the comment from the idl > completely? Remove the "hreflang and type are not reflected" comment.
On 2015/10/21 07:09:28, philipj wrote: > On 2015/10/21 06:38:06, tanay.c wrote: > > On 2015/10/20 13:05:56, philipj wrote: > > > On 2015/10/16 14:09:51, philipj wrote: > > > > On 2015/10/13 15:29:35, tanay.c wrote: > > > > > On 2015/10/08 11:13:16, philipj wrote: > > > > > > LGTM, and I've tweaked the description slightly. > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the spec issue was reopened, so let's wait for 24 hours > before > > > > > landing > > > > > > this, just in case it's reverted. > > > > > > > > > > Can this be landed? > > > > > > > > Please wait a little, the proposal I've made would actually change this > > again: > > > > https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/232#issuecomment-148727450 > > > > > > OK, it's done, hreflang and type aren't mentioned in the IDL blocks at all > any > > > longer. > > > > Is it ok to land in current state. Or should I remove the comment from the idl > > > completely? > > Remove the "hreflang and type are not reflected" comment. PTAL
The CQ bit was checked by philipj@opera.com
lgtm
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1381913002/120001 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1381913002/120001
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
The author tanay.c@samsung.com has not signed Google Contributor License Agreement. Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com to sign and manage CLA.
The CQ bit was checked by tanay.c@samsung.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1381913002/120001 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1381913002/120001
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
The author tanay.c@samsung.com has not signed Google Contributor License Agreement. Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com to sign and manage CLA.
On 2015/10/25 12:32:20, commit-bot: I haz the power wrote: > The author mailto:tanay.c@samsung.com has not signed Google Contributor License > Agreement. Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com to sign and manage > CLA. I recently had an issue with my account and the CLA needs to be renewed. This patch will be landed as soon as this is done.
The CQ bit was checked by tanay.c@samsung.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/1381913002/120001 View timeline at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-timeline/1381913002/120001
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #7 (id:120001)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 7 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/d1eee5bdec4e21fc7e0b376e00f4492a940bdbdb Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#356272} |