Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2325)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/renderer_host/thread_hop_resource_throttle.cc

Issue 1372263002: Add a field trial to delay all resource requests by thread hops. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: asvitkine Created 5 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/renderer_host/thread_hop_resource_throttle.h ('k') | chrome/chrome_browser.gypi » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: chrome/browser/renderer_host/thread_hop_resource_throttle.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/renderer_host/thread_hop_resource_throttle.cc b/chrome/browser/renderer_host/thread_hop_resource_throttle.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cdd71fe66646c458426ffb92c029231621ca5371
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chrome/browser/renderer_host/thread_hop_resource_throttle.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+// Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "chrome/browser/renderer_host/thread_hop_resource_throttle.h"
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/bind_helpers.h"
+#include "base/location.h"
+#include "base/metrics/field_trial.h"
+#include "base/metrics/histogram_macros.h"
+#include "base/strings/string_util.h"
+#include "base/time/time.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/browser_thread.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/resource_controller.h"
+
+ThreadHopResourceThrottle::ThreadHopResourceThrottle() : weak_factory_(this) {}
+
+ThreadHopResourceThrottle::~ThreadHopResourceThrottle() {}
+
+bool ThreadHopResourceThrottle::IsEnabled() {
+ const std::string group_name =
+ base::FieldTrialList::FindFullName("ThreadHopResourceThrottle");
+ return base::StartsWith(group_name, "Enabled", base::CompareCase::SENSITIVE);
+}
+
+void ThreadHopResourceThrottle::WillStartRequest(bool* defer) {
+ *defer = true;
+ ResumeAfterThreadHop();
+}
+
+void ThreadHopResourceThrottle::WillRedirectRequest(
+ const net::RedirectInfo& redirect_info,
+ bool* defer) {
+ *defer = true;
+ ResumeAfterThreadHop();
+}
+
+void ThreadHopResourceThrottle::WillProcessResponse(bool* defer) {
+ *defer = true;
+ ResumeAfterThreadHop();
+}
+
+const char* ThreadHopResourceThrottle::GetNameForLogging() const {
+ return "ThreadHopResourceThrottle";
+}
+
+void ThreadHopResourceThrottle::ResumeAfterThreadHop() {
+ content::BrowserThread::PostTaskAndReply(
sky 2015/10/06 20:06:03 What would happen if we ran a nested message loop
davidben 2015/10/06 20:18:00 I expect it would, yeah, unless that nested messag
+ content::BrowserThread::UI, FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&base::DoNothing),
+ base::Bind(&ThreadHopResourceThrottle::Resume, weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
+ base::TimeTicks::Now()));
+}
+
+void ThreadHopResourceThrottle::Resume(const base::TimeTicks& time) {
+ UMA_HISTOGRAM_TIMES("Net.ThreadHopResourceThrottleTime",
+ base::TimeTicks::Now() - time);
+ controller()->Resume();
+}
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/renderer_host/thread_hop_resource_throttle.h ('k') | chrome/chrome_browser.gypi » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698