remoting/webapp/crd/html/public_session.css - Issue 1370283004: [Chromoting] Remote Assistance in Public Session.

Side by Side Diff

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Side by Side Diff: remoting/webapp/crd/html/public_session.css

Issue 1370283004: [Chromoting] Remote Assistance in Public Session. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@PublicSession

Patch Set: Fix GN build Created 5 years, 2 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View unified diff | Download patch

OLD	NEW
1 /* Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.	1 /* Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.

2 * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be	2 * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be

3 * found in the LICENSE file.	3 * found in the LICENSE file.

4 */	4 */

5	5

6 html {	6 .kd-modaldialog {

7 background-image: radial-gradient(#444, #111);	7 border: none;

8 }	8 outline: none;

	9 box-shadow: none;
	Jamie 2015/09/30 17:46:13 The intent here is to override the definition in m The intent here is to override the definition in main.css, correct? In that case, I would prefer you do something to make the selector more specific, rather than relying on the include order. I think !important is acceptable here, or if the dialog has an id you could reference that explicitly. kelvinp 2015/09/30 19:35:47 Done. Show quoted text On 2015/09/30 17:46:13, Jamie wrote: > The intent here is to override the definition in main.css, correct? In that > case, I would prefer you do something to make the selector more specific, rather > than relying on the include order. I think !important is acceptable here, or if > the dialog has an id you could reference that explicitly. Done.
	10 }

OLD	NEW