more blurrect rebaselines

more blurrect rebaselines

BUG=skia:2108
Committed: http://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=13247

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-01-30 20:45:35]

No comments yet.

[humper, 2014-01-30 20:52:56]

ptal

[epoger, 2014-01-30 20:54:59]

LGTM

https://codereview.chromium.org/136813005/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Android...
File
expectations/gm/Test-Android-IntelRhb-SGX544-x86-Release/expected-results.json
(left):

https://codereview.chromium.org/136813005/diff/1/expectations/gm/Test-Android...
expectations/gm/Test-Android-IntelRhb-SGX544-x86-Release/expected-results.json:695:
"bugs": [
It's a little scary to be marking these previously-unreviewed-by-human results
as reviewed-by-human.  Ideally, one of two things would happen:

1. We make really sure that the results really are correct (not just "not too
different from what they were before my change"), OR

2. rebaseline_server would keep the reviewed-by-human and bug # fields in place,
on a test-by-test basis, unless you purposely modified them

But it's not an ideal world.  We'll just live with it.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-01-30 20:57:12]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://skia-tree-status.appspot.com/cq/humper@google.com/136813005/1

[epoger, 2014-01-30 21:07:07]

OH... I need to reopen the tree for the commitqueue to land this.  (I put the
tree in "caution" pending this very fix!)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-01-30 21:07:46]

Change committed as 13247

[epoger, 2014-01-30 21:08:46]

P.S. In the future, we can add "NOTREECHECK=True" to the CL description, and the
CQ will happily commit to yellow or red tree.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-01-30 21:09:45]

CQ bit was unchecked on CL. Ignoring.