| OLD | NEW |
| 1 #!/usr/bin/env python | 1 #!/usr/bin/env python |
| 2 # Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. | 2 # Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. |
| 3 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | 3 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
| 4 # found in the LICENSE file. | 4 # found in the LICENSE file. |
| 5 | 5 |
| 6 """Unit tests for pending_manager.py.""" | 6 """Unit tests for pending_manager.py.""" |
| 7 | 7 |
| 8 import logging | 8 import logging |
| 9 import os | 9 import os |
| 10 import re | 10 import re |
| (...skipping 88 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after Loading... |
| 99 'prepare(None)', # Will sync to HEAD/124. | 99 'prepare(None)', # Will sync to HEAD/124. |
| 100 'apply_patch(%r)' % (self.context.rietveld.patchsets[1],), | 100 'apply_patch(%r)' % (self.context.rietveld.patchsets[1],), |
| 101 ( | 101 ( |
| 102 "commit(u'foo\\n\\n" | 102 "commit(u'foo\\n\\n" |
| 103 "Review URL: http://nowhere/%d', " | 103 "Review URL: http://nowhere/%d', " |
| 104 "u'author@example.com')") % issue]) | 104 "u'author@example.com')") % issue]) |
| 105 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 105 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 106 [ _try_comment(), | 106 [ _try_comment(), |
| 107 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, | 107 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, |
| 108 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, | 108 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, |
| 109 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | |
| 110 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) | 109 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) |
| 111 else: | 110 else: |
| 112 self.context.checkout.check_calls( | 111 self.context.checkout.check_calls( |
| 113 [ 'prepare(None)', | 112 [ 'prepare(None)', |
| 114 'apply_patch(%r)' % (self.context.rietveld.patchsets[0],)]) | 113 'apply_patch(%r)' % (self.context.rietveld.patchsets[0],)]) |
| 115 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 114 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 116 [ _try_comment(), | 115 [ _try_comment(), |
| 117 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | 116 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, |
| 118 "add_comment(%d, %r)" % (issue, fake.failed_message())]) | 117 "add_comment(%d, %r)" % (issue, fake.failed_message())]) |
| 119 else: | 118 else: |
| 120 if success: | 119 if success: |
| 121 self.context.checkout.check_calls( | 120 self.context.checkout.check_calls( |
| 122 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue)) | 121 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue)) |
| 123 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 122 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 124 [ _try_comment(), | 123 [ _try_comment(), |
| 125 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, | 124 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, |
| 126 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, | 125 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, |
| 127 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | |
| 128 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) | 126 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) |
| 129 else: | 127 else: |
| 130 # checkout is never touched in that case. | 128 # checkout is never touched in that case. |
| 131 self.context.checkout.check_calls([]) | 129 self.context.checkout.check_calls([]) |
| 132 if defered: | 130 if defered: |
| 133 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 131 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 134 [ _try_comment(), | 132 [ _try_comment(), |
| 135 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | 133 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, |
| 136 "add_comment(%d, %r)" % (issue, fake.failed_message())]) | 134 "add_comment(%d, %r)" % (issue, fake.failed_message())]) |
| 137 else: | 135 else: |
| (...skipping 67 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after Loading... |
| 205 if result == base.FAILED: | 203 if result == base.FAILED: |
| 206 self.assertEqual([], pc.queue.iterate()) | 204 self.assertEqual([], pc.queue.iterate()) |
| 207 else: | 205 else: |
| 208 commit = pc.queue.get(issue) | 206 commit = pc.queue.get(issue) |
| 209 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake'].get_state(), result) | 207 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake'].get_state(), result) |
| 210 self.assertEqual('', commit.relpath) | 208 self.assertEqual('', commit.relpath) |
| 211 self.assertEqual(len(commit.verifications), 1) | 209 self.assertEqual(len(commit.verifications), 1) |
| 212 self._check_standard_verification(pc, result == base.SUCCEEDED, False) | 210 self._check_standard_verification(pc, result == base.SUCCEEDED, False) |
| 213 | 211 |
| 214 if result == base.SUCCEEDED: | 212 if result == base.SUCCEEDED: |
| 215 self.context.status.check_names( | 213 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit']) |
| 216 ['initial', 'why not', 'commit', 'abort']) | |
| 217 elif send_initial_packet: | 214 elif send_initial_packet: |
| 218 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'abort']) | 215 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'abort']) |
| 219 else: | 216 else: |
| 220 # Only happens when there is no verifier that requires a patch. | 217 # Only happens when there is no verifier that requires a patch. |
| 221 self.context.status.check_names(['abort']) | 218 self.context.status.check_names(['abort']) |
| 222 | 219 |
| 223 def testNoPatchVerification(self): | 220 def testNoPatchVerification(self): |
| 224 pc = self._get_pc([fake.FakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED)], []) | 221 pc = self._get_pc([fake.FakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED)], []) |
| 225 self._check_1(pc, base.SUCCEEDED) | 222 self._check_1(pc, base.SUCCEEDED) |
| 226 | 223 |
| (...skipping 58 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after Loading... |
| 285 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake'].get_state(), base.PROCESSING) | 282 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake'].get_state(), base.PROCESSING) |
| 286 self.assertEqual(len(commit.verifications), 1) | 283 self.assertEqual(len(commit.verifications), 1) |
| 287 pc.update_status() | 284 pc.update_status() |
| 288 commit = pc.queue.get(issue) | 285 commit = pc.queue.get(issue) |
| 289 self.assertEqual('', commit.relpath) | 286 self.assertEqual('', commit.relpath) |
| 290 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake'].get_state(), result) | 287 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake'].get_state(), result) |
| 291 self.assertEqual(len(commit.verifications), 1) | 288 self.assertEqual(len(commit.verifications), 1) |
| 292 self._check_standard_verification(pc, result == base.SUCCEEDED, True) | 289 self._check_standard_verification(pc, result == base.SUCCEEDED, True) |
| 293 if result == base.SUCCEEDED: | 290 if result == base.SUCCEEDED: |
| 294 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'why not', | 291 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'why not', |
| 295 'why not', 'commit', 'abort']) | 292 'why not', 'commit']) |
| 296 else: | 293 else: |
| 297 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'why not', | 294 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'why not', |
| 298 'abort']) | 295 'abort']) |
| 299 | 296 |
| 300 def testDeferNoPatchVerification(self): | 297 def testDeferNoPatchVerification(self): |
| 301 pc = self._get_pc([fake.DeferredFakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED, 0)], []) | 298 pc = self._get_pc([fake.DeferredFakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED, 0)], []) |
| 302 self._check_defer_1(pc, base.SUCCEEDED) | 299 self._check_defer_1(pc, base.SUCCEEDED) |
| 303 | 300 |
| 304 def testDeferPatchVerification(self): | 301 def testDeferPatchVerification(self): |
| 305 pc = self._get_pc([], [fake.DeferredFakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED, 0)]) | 302 pc = self._get_pc([], [fake.DeferredFakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED, 0)]) |
| (...skipping 46 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after Loading... |
| 352 else: | 349 else: |
| 353 commit = pc.queue.get(issue) | 350 commit = pc.queue.get(issue) |
| 354 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake1'].get_state(), f1) | 351 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake1'].get_state(), f1) |
| 355 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake2'].get_state(), f2) | 352 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake2'].get_state(), f2) |
| 356 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake3'].get_state(), f3) | 353 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake3'].get_state(), f3) |
| 357 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake4'].get_state(), f4) | 354 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake4'].get_state(), f4) |
| 358 self.assertEqual(len(commit.verifications), nb) | 355 self.assertEqual(len(commit.verifications), nb) |
| 359 self._check_standard_verification( | 356 self._check_standard_verification( |
| 360 pc, all(x == base.SUCCEEDED for x in (f1, f2, f3, f4)), False) | 357 pc, all(x == base.SUCCEEDED for x in (f1, f2, f3, f4)), False) |
| 361 if all(x == base.SUCCEEDED for x in (f1, f2, f3, f4)): | 358 if all(x == base.SUCCEEDED for x in (f1, f2, f3, f4)): |
| 362 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit', 'abort']) | 359 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit']) |
| 363 else: | 360 else: |
| 364 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'abort']) | 361 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'abort']) |
| 365 | 362 |
| 366 def test4thVerificationFail(self): | 363 def test4thVerificationFail(self): |
| 367 self._check_4(base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.FAILED) | 364 self._check_4(base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.FAILED) |
| 368 | 365 |
| 369 def test4Verification(self): | 366 def test4Verification(self): |
| 370 self._check_4( | 367 self._check_4( |
| 371 base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED) | 368 base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED) |
| 372 | 369 |
| (...skipping 30 matching lines...) Expand all Loading... |
| 403 pc.update_status() | 400 pc.update_status() |
| 404 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake1'].get_state(), f1) | 401 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake1'].get_state(), f1) |
| 405 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake2'].get_state(), f2) | 402 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake2'].get_state(), f2) |
| 406 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake3'].get_state(), f3) | 403 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake3'].get_state(), f3) |
| 407 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake4'].get_state(), f4) | 404 self.assertEqual(commit.verifications['fake4'].get_state(), f4) |
| 408 self.assertEqual('', commit.relpath) | 405 self.assertEqual('', commit.relpath) |
| 409 self._check_standard_verification( | 406 self._check_standard_verification( |
| 410 pc, all(x == base.SUCCEEDED for x in (f1, f2, f3, f4)), False) | 407 pc, all(x == base.SUCCEEDED for x in (f1, f2, f3, f4)), False) |
| 411 if all(x == base.SUCCEEDED for x in (f1, f2, f3, f4)): | 408 if all(x == base.SUCCEEDED for x in (f1, f2, f3, f4)): |
| 412 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'why not', | 409 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'why not', |
| 413 'why not', 'commit', 'abort']) | 410 'why not', 'commit']) |
| 414 else: | 411 else: |
| 415 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'why not', | 412 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'why not', |
| 416 'abort']) | 413 'abort']) |
| 417 | 414 |
| 418 def testDefer4thVerificationFail(self): | 415 def testDefer4thVerificationFail(self): |
| 419 self._check_defer_4( | 416 self._check_defer_4( |
| 420 base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.FAILED) | 417 base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.SUCCEEDED, base.FAILED) |
| 421 | 418 |
| 422 def testDefer4Verification(self): | 419 def testDefer4Verification(self): |
| 423 self._check_defer_4( | 420 self._check_defer_4( |
| (...skipping 21 matching lines...) Expand all Loading... |
| 445 pc.update_status() | 442 pc.update_status() |
| 446 self.context.checkout.check_calls([]) | 443 self.context.checkout.check_calls([]) |
| 447 pc.scan_results() | 444 pc.scan_results() |
| 448 self.context.checkout.check_calls( | 445 self.context.checkout.check_calls( |
| 449 # Will sync to HEAD, 124. | 446 # Will sync to HEAD, 124. |
| 450 self._prepare_apply_commit(1, issue)) | 447 self._prepare_apply_commit(1, issue)) |
| 451 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 448 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 452 [ _try_comment(), | 449 [ _try_comment(), |
| 453 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, | 450 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, |
| 454 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, | 451 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, |
| 455 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | |
| 456 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) | 452 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) |
| 457 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit', 'abort']) | 453 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit']) |
| 458 | 454 |
| 459 def testCommitBurst(self): | 455 def testCommitBurst(self): |
| 460 issue = 31337 | 456 issue = 31337 |
| 461 pc = self._get_pc([fake.FakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED)], []) | 457 pc = self._get_pc([fake.FakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED)], []) |
| 462 self.assertEqual(4, pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST) | 458 self.assertEqual(4, pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST) |
| 463 timestamp = [1] | 459 timestamp = [1] |
| 464 self.mock(time, 'time', lambda: timestamp[-1]) | 460 self.mock(time, 'time', lambda: timestamp[-1]) |
| 465 for i in range(pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST + 2): | 461 for i in range(pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST + 2): |
| 466 self.context.rietveld.issues[i] = ( | 462 self.context.rietveld.issues[i] = ( |
| 467 self.context.rietveld.issues[issue].copy()) | 463 self.context.rietveld.issues[issue].copy()) |
| (...skipping 11 matching lines...) Expand all Loading... |
| 479 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 475 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 480 [ _try_comment(0), | 476 [ _try_comment(0), |
| 481 _try_comment(1), | 477 _try_comment(1), |
| 482 _try_comment(2), | 478 _try_comment(2), |
| 483 _try_comment(3), | 479 _try_comment(3), |
| 484 _try_comment(4), | 480 _try_comment(4), |
| 485 _try_comment(5), | 481 _try_comment(5), |
| 486 _try_comment(), | 482 _try_comment(), |
| 487 'close_issue(0)', | 483 'close_issue(0)', |
| 488 "update_description(0, u'foo')", | 484 "update_description(0, u'foo')", |
| 489 "set_flag(0, 1, 'commit', False)", | |
| 490 "add_comment(0, 'Change committed as 125')", | 485 "add_comment(0, 'Change committed as 125')", |
| 491 'close_issue(1)', | 486 'close_issue(1)', |
| 492 "update_description(1, u'foo')", | 487 "update_description(1, u'foo')", |
| 493 "set_flag(1, 1, 'commit', False)", | |
| 494 "add_comment(1, 'Change committed as 125')", | 488 "add_comment(1, 'Change committed as 125')", |
| 495 'close_issue(2)', | 489 'close_issue(2)', |
| 496 "update_description(2, u'foo')", | 490 "update_description(2, u'foo')", |
| 497 "set_flag(2, 1, 'commit', False)", | |
| 498 "add_comment(2, 'Change committed as 125')", | 491 "add_comment(2, 'Change committed as 125')", |
| 499 'close_issue(3)', | 492 'close_issue(3)', |
| 500 "update_description(3, u'foo')", | 493 "update_description(3, u'foo')", |
| 501 "set_flag(3, 1, 'commit', False)", | |
| 502 "add_comment(3, 'Change committed as 125')", | 494 "add_comment(3, 'Change committed as 125')", |
| 503 ]) | 495 ]) |
| 504 self.assertEqual(3, len(pc.queue.iterate())) | 496 self.assertEqual(3, len(pc.queue.iterate())) |
| 505 total = pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST + 3 | 497 total = pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST + 3 |
| 506 self.context.status.check_names(['initial'] * total + | 498 self.context.status.check_names(['initial'] * total + |
| 507 (['why not', 'commit', 'abort'] * | 499 (['why not', 'commit'] * |
| 508 pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST) + | 500 pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST) + |
| 509 ['why not'] * 3) | 501 ['why not'] * 3) |
| 510 | 502 |
| 511 # Dry run. | 503 # Dry run. |
| 512 pc.scan_results() | 504 pc.scan_results() |
| 513 self.context.checkout.check_calls([]) | 505 self.context.checkout.check_calls([]) |
| 514 self.context.rietveld.check_calls([]) | 506 self.context.rietveld.check_calls([]) |
| 515 self.context.status.check_names(['why not'] * 3) | 507 self.context.status.check_names(['why not'] * 3) |
| 516 | 508 |
| 517 # Remove one item from the burst. | 509 # Remove one item from the burst. |
| 518 pc.recent_commit_timestamps.pop() | 510 pc.recent_commit_timestamps.pop() |
| 519 pc.scan_results() | 511 pc.scan_results() |
| 520 next_item = pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST | 512 next_item = pc.MAX_COMMIT_BURST |
| 521 self.context.checkout.check_calls( | 513 self.context.checkout.check_calls( |
| 522 self._prepare_apply_commit(next_item, next_item)) | 514 self._prepare_apply_commit(next_item, next_item)) |
| 523 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 515 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 524 [ 'close_issue(%d)' % next_item, | 516 [ 'close_issue(%d)' % next_item, |
| 525 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % next_item, | 517 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % next_item, |
| 526 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % next_item, | |
| 527 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % next_item, | 518 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % next_item, |
| 528 ]) | 519 ]) |
| 529 self.context.status.check_names(['why not', 'commit', 'abort'] + | 520 self.context.status.check_names(['why not', 'commit'] + ['why not'] * 2) |
| 530 ['why not'] * 2) | |
| 531 # After a delay, must flush the queue. | 521 # After a delay, must flush the queue. |
| 532 timestamp.append(timestamp[-1] + pc.COMMIT_BURST_DELAY + 1) | 522 timestamp.append(timestamp[-1] + pc.COMMIT_BURST_DELAY + 1) |
| 533 pc.scan_results() | 523 pc.scan_results() |
| 534 self.context.checkout.check_calls( | 524 self.context.checkout.check_calls( |
| 535 self._prepare_apply_commit(next_item + 1, next_item + 1) + | 525 self._prepare_apply_commit(next_item + 1, next_item + 1) + |
| 536 self._prepare_apply_commit(next_item + 2, issue)) | 526 self._prepare_apply_commit(next_item + 2, issue)) |
| 537 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 527 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 538 [ 'close_issue(%d)' % (next_item + 1), | 528 [ 'close_issue(%d)' % (next_item + 1), |
| 539 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % (next_item + 1), | 529 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % (next_item + 1), |
| 540 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % (next_item + 1), | |
| 541 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % (next_item + 1), | 530 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % (next_item + 1), |
| 542 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, | 531 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, |
| 543 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, | 532 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, |
| 544 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | |
| 545 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) | 533 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) |
| 546 self.context.status.check_names(['why not', 'commit', 'abort'] * 2) | 534 self.context.status.check_names(['why not', 'commit'] * 2) |
| 547 | 535 |
| 548 def testIgnored(self): | 536 def testIgnored(self): |
| 549 issue = 31337 | 537 issue = 31337 |
| 550 verifiers = [ | 538 verifiers = [ |
| 551 project_base.ProjectBaseUrlVerifier( | 539 project_base.ProjectBaseUrlVerifier( |
| 552 [r'^%s(.*)$' % re.escape(r'http://example.com/')]), | 540 [r'^%s(.*)$' % re.escape(r'http://example.com/')]), |
| 553 ] | 541 ] |
| 554 pc = self._get_pc(verifiers, []) | 542 pc = self._get_pc(verifiers, []) |
| 555 pc.context.rietveld.issues[issue]['base_url'] = 'http://unrelated.com/sub' | 543 pc.context.rietveld.issues[issue]['base_url'] = 'http://unrelated.com/sub' |
| 556 pc.look_for_new_pending_commit() | 544 pc.look_for_new_pending_commit() |
| (...skipping 14 matching lines...) Expand all Loading... |
| 571 pc = self._get_pc(verifiers, []) | 559 pc = self._get_pc(verifiers, []) |
| 572 pc.context.rietveld.issues[issue]['base_url'] = 'http://example.com/' | 560 pc.context.rietveld.issues[issue]['base_url'] = 'http://example.com/' |
| 573 pc.look_for_new_pending_commit() | 561 pc.look_for_new_pending_commit() |
| 574 pc.process_new_pending_commit() | 562 pc.process_new_pending_commit() |
| 575 pc.update_status() | 563 pc.update_status() |
| 576 pc.scan_results() | 564 pc.scan_results() |
| 577 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 565 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 578 [ _try_comment(), | 566 [ _try_comment(), |
| 579 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, | 567 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, |
| 580 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, | 568 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, |
| 581 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | |
| 582 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) | 569 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) |
| 583 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit', 'abort']) | 570 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit']) |
| 584 self.context.checkout.check_calls( | 571 self.context.checkout.check_calls( |
| 585 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue, server_hooks_missing=True)) | 572 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue, server_hooks_missing=True)) |
| 586 | 573 |
| 587 def testDisappeared(self): | 574 def testDisappeared(self): |
| 588 issue = 31337 | 575 issue = 31337 |
| 589 verifiers = [ | 576 verifiers = [ |
| 590 project_base.ProjectBaseUrlVerifier( | 577 project_base.ProjectBaseUrlVerifier( |
| 591 [r'^%s(.*)$' % re.escape(r'http://example.com/')]), | 578 [r'^%s(.*)$' % re.escape(r'http://example.com/')]), |
| 592 ] | 579 ] |
| 593 pc = self._get_pc(verifiers, []) | 580 pc = self._get_pc(verifiers, []) |
| (...skipping 60 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after Loading... |
| 654 pc.process_new_pending_commit() | 641 pc.process_new_pending_commit() |
| 655 self.assertEqual(1, len(pc.queue.iterate())) | 642 self.assertEqual(1, len(pc.queue.iterate())) |
| 656 pc.update_status() | 643 pc.update_status() |
| 657 self.assertEqual(1, len(pc.queue.iterate())) | 644 self.assertEqual(1, len(pc.queue.iterate())) |
| 658 pc.scan_results() | 645 pc.scan_results() |
| 659 self.assertEqual(0, len(pc.queue.iterate())) | 646 self.assertEqual(0, len(pc.queue.iterate())) |
| 660 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 647 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 661 [ _try_comment(), | 648 [ _try_comment(), |
| 662 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, | 649 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, |
| 663 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, | 650 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, |
| 664 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | |
| 665 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) | 651 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) |
| 666 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit', 'abort']) | 652 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit']) |
| 667 self.context.checkout.check_calls( | 653 self.context.checkout.check_calls( |
| 668 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue)) | 654 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue)) |
| 669 | 655 |
| 670 def testDriveBy(self): | 656 def testDriveBy(self): |
| 671 issue = 31337 | 657 issue = 31337 |
| 672 pc = self._get_pc_reviewer() | 658 pc = self._get_pc_reviewer() |
| 673 self._approve() | 659 self._approve() |
| 674 pc.look_for_new_pending_commit() | 660 pc.look_for_new_pending_commit() |
| 675 pc.process_new_pending_commit() | 661 pc.process_new_pending_commit() |
| 676 pc.update_status() | 662 pc.update_status() |
| (...skipping 18 matching lines...) Expand all Loading... |
| 695 # He's nice, he left a LGTM. | 681 # He's nice, he left a LGTM. |
| 696 i = self.context.rietveld.issues[issue] | 682 i = self.context.rietveld.issues[issue] |
| 697 i['reviewers'] = i['reviewers'] + ['nice@dude.org'] | 683 i['reviewers'] = i['reviewers'] + ['nice@dude.org'] |
| 698 self._approve('nice@dude.org') | 684 self._approve('nice@dude.org') |
| 699 pc.scan_results() | 685 pc.scan_results() |
| 700 self.assertEqual(0, len(pc.queue.iterate())) | 686 self.assertEqual(0, len(pc.queue.iterate())) |
| 701 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 687 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 702 [ _try_comment(), | 688 [ _try_comment(), |
| 703 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, | 689 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, |
| 704 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, | 690 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, |
| 705 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | |
| 706 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) | 691 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) |
| 707 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit', 'abort']) | 692 self.context.status.check_names(['initial', 'why not', 'commit']) |
| 708 self.context.checkout.check_calls( | 693 self.context.checkout.check_calls( |
| 709 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue)) | 694 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue)) |
| 710 | 695 |
| 711 def testWhyNotUpdates(self): | 696 def testWhyNotUpdates(self): |
| 712 issue = 31337 | 697 issue = 31337 |
| 713 fake1_change = 1 | 698 fake1_change = 1 |
| 714 fake1 = fake.DeferredFakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED, fake1_change) | 699 fake1 = fake.DeferredFakeVerifier(base.SUCCEEDED, fake1_change) |
| 715 fake1.name = 'fake1' | 700 fake1.name = 'fake1' |
| 716 | 701 |
| 717 fake2_change = 3 | 702 fake2_change = 3 |
| (...skipping 10 matching lines...) Expand all Loading... |
| 728 expected = ['why not'] if fake1_change == i or fake2_change == i else [] | 713 expected = ['why not'] if fake1_change == i or fake2_change == i else [] |
| 729 pc.update_status() | 714 pc.update_status() |
| 730 self.context.status.check_names(expected) | 715 self.context.status.check_names(expected) |
| 731 | 716 |
| 732 pc.scan_results() | 717 pc.scan_results() |
| 733 | 718 |
| 734 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( | 719 self.context.rietveld.check_calls( |
| 735 [_try_comment(), | 720 [_try_comment(), |
| 736 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, | 721 'close_issue(%d)' % issue, |
| 737 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, | 722 "update_description(%d, u'foo')" % issue, |
| 738 "set_flag(%d, 1, 'commit', False)" % issue, | |
| 739 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) | 723 "add_comment(%d, 'Change committed as 125')" % issue]) |
| 740 self.context.status.check_names(['why not', 'commit', 'abort']) | 724 self.context.status.check_names(['why not', 'commit']) |
| 741 self.context.checkout.check_calls( | 725 self.context.checkout.check_calls( |
| 742 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue)) | 726 self._prepare_apply_commit(0, issue)) |
| 743 | 727 |
| 744 | 728 |
| 745 if __name__ == '__main__': | 729 if __name__ == '__main__': |
| 746 logging.basicConfig( | 730 logging.basicConfig( |
| 747 level=[logging.ERROR, logging.WARNING, logging.INFO, logging.DEBUG][ | 731 level=[logging.ERROR, logging.WARNING, logging.INFO, logging.DEBUG][ |
| 748 min(sys.argv.count('-v'), 3)], | 732 min(sys.argv.count('-v'), 3)], |
| 749 format='%(levelname)5s %(module)15s(%(lineno)3d): %(message)s') | 733 format='%(levelname)5s %(module)15s(%(lineno)3d): %(message)s') |
| 750 unittest.main() | 734 unittest.main() |
| OLD | NEW |