Update NaCl ARM build flags now that gcc used as default compiler.

build/download_nacl_toolchains.py

Index: build/download_nacl_toolchains.py
diff --git a/build/download_nacl_toolchains.py b/build/download_nacl_toolchains.py
index c2007d0f1038258af358413cf8a06e8e210445f7..159d906c3d9d6cddb1d432a29e2ef84ab3205bde 100755
--- a/build/download_nacl_toolchains.py
+++ b/build/download_nacl_toolchains.py
@@ -34,22 +34,21 @@ def Main(args):
   # gclient sync time for developers, or standard Chrome bots.
   if '--optional-pnacl' in args:
     args.remove('--optional-pnacl')
-    # By default we don't use PNaCl toolchain yet, unless on ARM, where
-    # there is no other toolchain to build untrusted code at the moment.
-    # So analyze if we're building for ARM, or on SDK buildbot.
-    # TODO(olonho): we need to invent more reliable way to get build
-    # configuration info, to know if we're building for ARM.
     use_pnacl = False
-    if 'target_arch=arm' in os.environ.get('GYP_DEFINES', ''):
-      use_pnacl = True
     buildbot_name = os.environ.get('BUILDBOT_BUILDERNAME', '')
-    if buildbot_name.find('pnacl') >= 0 and  buildbot_name.find('sdk') >= 0:
+    if 'pnacl' in buildbot_name and 'sdk' in buildbot_name:
       use_pnacl = True
     if use_pnacl:
       print '\n*** DOWNLOADING PNACL TOOLCHAIN ***\n'
     else:
       args.append('--no-pnacl')
 
+  # Only download the ARM gcc toolchain if we are building for ARM
+  # TODO(olonho): we need to invent more reliable way to get build
+  # configuration info, to know if we're building for ARM.
+  if 'target_arch=arm' in os.environ.get('GYP_DEFINES', ''):
+      args.append('--arm-untrusted')
+
   # Append the name of the file to use as a version and hash source.
   # NOTE:  While not recommended, it is possible to redirect this file to
   # a chrome location to avoid branching NaCl if just a toolchain needs
@@ -62,3 +61,4 @@ def Main(args):
 
 if __name__ == '__main__':
   sys.exit(Main(sys.argv[1:]))
+  sys.exit(Main(sys.argv[1:]))

[Derek Schuff, 2013/04/04 20:36:55]

duplicate?