Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(62)

Unified Diff: include/core/SkUtils.h

Issue 1357193002: update memset16/32 inlining heuristics (Closed) Base URL: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia.git@master
Patch Set: dont forget armv7, INLINE_IF Created 5 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: include/core/SkUtils.h
diff --git a/include/core/SkUtils.h b/include/core/SkUtils.h
index 4e24bd0883555e641515c8a35e0029086f4b22b6..2b390f04e5270b1ed64c1bfaaffe0f5be91b69bd 100644
--- a/include/core/SkUtils.h
+++ b/include/core/SkUtils.h
@@ -17,13 +17,12 @@ namespace SkOpts {
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-// The inlining heuristics below were determined using bench/MemsetBench.cpp
-// on a x86 desktop, a Nexus 7 with and without NEON, and a Nexus 9:
-// - on x86, inlining was never faster,
-// - on ARMv7, inlining was faster for N<=10. Putting this check inside the NEON
-// code was not helpful; it's got to be here outside.
-// - NEON code generation for ARMv8 with GCC 4.9 is terrible,
-// making the NEON code ~8x slower that just a serial loop.
+// Inlining heuristics were determined by using perf.skia.org and bench/MemsetBench.cpp.
+// When using MSVC, inline is better >= 1K and worse <= 100. The Nexus Player was the opposite.
+// Otherwise, when NEON or SSE is available to GCC or Clang, they can handle it best.
+// See https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=516426#c15 for more details.
+// See also skia:4316; it might be a good idea to use rep stosw/stosd here.
+#define INLINE_IF(cond) if (cond) { while (count --> 0) { *buffer++ = value; } return; }
Noel Gordon 2015/11/25 02:02:25 while (count --> 0) I suppose it compiles, but ma
/** Similar to memset(), but it assigns a 16bit value into the buffer.
@param buffer The memory to have value copied into it
@@ -31,10 +30,14 @@ namespace SkOpts {
@param count The number of times value should be copied into the buffer.
*/
static inline void sk_memset16(uint16_t buffer[], uint16_t value, int count) {
-#if defined(SK_CPU_ARM64)
- while (count --> 0) { *buffer++ = value; } return;
-#elif defined(SK_CPU_ARM32)
- if (count <= 10) { while (count --> 0) { *buffer++ = value; } return; }
+#if defined(_MSC_VER)
+ INLINE_IF(count > 300)
+#elif defined(SK_BUILD_FOR_ANDROID) && defined(SK_CPU_X86)
+ INLINE_IF(count < 300)
+#elif defined(SK_ARM_HAS_NEON) || SK_CPU_SSE_LEVEL >= SK_CPU_SSE_LEVEL_SSE2
+ INLINE_IF(true)
+#else
+ INLINE_IF(count <= 10)
#endif
SkOpts::memset16(buffer, value, count);
}
@@ -45,14 +48,19 @@ static inline void sk_memset16(uint16_t buffer[], uint16_t value, int count) {
@param count The number of times value should be copied into the buffer.
*/
static inline void sk_memset32(uint32_t buffer[], uint32_t value, int count) {
-#if defined(SK_CPU_ARM64)
- while (count --> 0) { *buffer++ = value; } return;
-#elif defined(SK_CPU_ARM32)
- if (count <= 10) { while (count --> 0) { *buffer++ = value; } return; }
+#if defined(_MSC_VER)
+ INLINE_IF(count > 300)
+#elif defined(SK_BUILD_FOR_ANDROID) && defined(SK_CPU_X86)
+ INLINE_IF(count < 300)
+#elif defined(SK_ARM_HAS_NEON) || SK_CPU_SSE_LEVEL >= SK_CPU_SSE_LEVEL_SSE2
+ INLINE_IF(true)
+#else
+ INLINE_IF(count <= 10)
#endif
SkOpts::memset32(buffer, value, count);
}
+#undef INLINE_IF
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698