Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(313)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Unified Diff: Source/core/css/AffectedByFocusTest.cpp

Issue 135183002: Avoid unnecessary style recalc for subtree of focused element. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk
Patch Set: Corrected comments in tests. Created 6 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « Source/core/core.gypi ('k') | Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: Source/core/css/AffectedByFocusTest.cpp
diff --git a/Source/core/css/AffectedByFocusTest.cpp b/Source/core/css/AffectedByFocusTest.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..518f173125048df527c0fa5251d1b727798cec73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Source/core/css/AffectedByFocusTest.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "config.h"
+#include "HTMLNames.h"
+#include "core/dom/Element.h"
+#include "core/dom/ElementTraversal.h"
+#include "core/frame/FrameView.h"
+#include "core/html/HTMLDocument.h"
+#include "core/html/HTMLElement.h"
+#include "core/testing/DummyPageHolder.h"
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+using namespace WebCore;
+using namespace HTMLNames;
+
+namespace {
+
+class AffectedByFocusTest : public ::testing::Test {
eseidel 2014/01/31 06:25:19 Very cool that we're building up more unittest arc
+
+protected:
+
+ struct ElementResult {
+ const WebCore::QualifiedName tag;
+ bool affectedBy;
+ bool childrenAffectedBy;
+ };
+
+ virtual void SetUp() OVERRIDE;
+
+ HTMLDocument& document() const { return *m_document; }
+
+ void setHtmlInnerHTML(const char* htmlContent);
+
+ void checkElements(ElementResult expected[], unsigned expectedCount) const;
+
+private:
+ OwnPtr<DummyPageHolder> m_dummyPageHolder;
+
+ HTMLDocument* m_document;
+};
+
+void AffectedByFocusTest::SetUp()
+{
+ m_dummyPageHolder = DummyPageHolder::create(IntSize(800, 600));
+ m_document = toHTMLDocument(&m_dummyPageHolder->document());
+ ASSERT(m_document);
+}
+
+void AffectedByFocusTest::setHtmlInnerHTML(const char* htmlContent)
+{
+ document().documentElement()->setInnerHTML(String::fromUTF8(htmlContent), ASSERT_NO_EXCEPTION);
+ document().view()->updateLayoutAndStyleIfNeededRecursive();
+}
+
+void AffectedByFocusTest::checkElements(ElementResult expected[], unsigned expectedCount) const
+{
+ unsigned i = 0;
+ Element* elm = document().body();
+
+ for (; elm && i < 5; elm = ElementTraversal::next(*elm), ++i) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(elm->hasTagName(expected[i].tag));
+ ASSERT(elm->renderStyle());
+ ASSERT_EQ(expected[i].affectedBy, elm->renderStyle()->affectedByFocus());
+ ASSERT_EQ(expected[i].childrenAffectedBy, elm->childrenAffectedByFocus());
+ }
+
+ ASSERT(!elm && i == size);
+}
+
+// A global :focus rule in html.css currently causes every single element to be
eseidel 2014/01/31 06:25:19 We have a bug open with the w3c about this: https
+// affectedByFocus. Check that all elements in a document with no :focus rules
+// gets the affectedByFocus set on RenderStyle and not childrenAffectedByFocus.
+TEST_F(AffectedByFocusTest, UAUniversalFocusRule)
+{
+ ElementResult expected[] = {
+ { bodyTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { spanTag, true, false }
+ };
+
+ setHtmlInnerHTML("<body>"
+ "<div><div></div></div>"
+ "<div><span></span></div>"
+ "</body>");
+
+ checkElements(expected, sizeof(expected) / sizeof(ElementResult));
+}
+
+// ":focus div" will mark ascendants of all divs with childrenAffectedByFocus.
+TEST_F(AffectedByFocusTest, FocusedAscendant)
+{
+ ElementResult expected[] = {
+ { bodyTag, true, true },
+ { divTag, true, true },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { spanTag, true, false }
+ };
+
+ setHtmlInnerHTML("<head>"
+ "<style>:focus div { background-color: pink }</style>"
+ "</head>"
+ "<body>"
+ "<div><div></div></div>"
+ "<div><span></span></div>"
+ "</body>");
+
+ checkElements(expected, sizeof(expected) / sizeof(ElementResult));
+}
+
+// "body:focus div" will mark the body element with childrenAffectedByFocus.
+TEST_F(AffectedByFocusTest, FocusedAscendantWithType)
+{
+ ElementResult expected[] = {
+ { bodyTag, true, true },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { spanTag, true, false }
+ };
+
+ setHtmlInnerHTML("<head>"
+ "<style>body:focus div { background-color: pink }</style>"
+ "</head>"
+ "<body>"
+ "<div><div></div></div>"
+ "<div><span></span></div>"
+ "</body>");
+
+ checkElements(expected, sizeof(expected) / sizeof(ElementResult));
+}
+
+// ":not(body):focus div" should not mark the body element with childrenAffectedByFocus.
+// Note that currently ":focus:not(body)" does not do the same. Then the :focus is
+// checked and the childrenAffectedByFocus flag set before the negated type selector
+// is found.
+TEST_F(AffectedByFocusTest, FocusedAscendantWithNegatedType)
+{
+ ElementResult expected[] = {
+ { bodyTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, true },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, false },
+ { spanTag, true, false }
+ };
+
+ setHtmlInnerHTML("<head>"
+ "<style>:not(body):focus div { background-color: pink }</style>"
+ "</head>"
+ "<body>"
+ "<div><div></div></div>"
+ "<div><span></span></div>"
+ "</body>");
+
+ checkElements(expected, sizeof(expected) / sizeof(ElementResult));
+}
+
+// Checking current behavior for ":focus + div", but this is a BUG or at best
+// sub-optimal. The focused element will also in this case get childrenAffectedByFocus
+// even if it's really a sibling. Effectively, the whole sub-tree of the focused
+// element will have styles recalculated even though none of the children are
+// affected. There are other mechanisms that makes sure the sibling also gets its
+// styles recalculated.
+TEST_F(AffectedByFocusTest, FocusedSibling)
+{
+ ElementResult expected[] = {
+ { bodyTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, true },
+ { spanTag, true, false },
+ { divTag, true, false }
+ };
+
+ setHtmlInnerHTML("<head>"
+ "<style>:focus + div { background-color: pink }</style>"
+ "</head>"
+ "<body>"
+ "<div>"
+ " <span></span>"
+ "</div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "</body>");
+
+ checkElements(expected, sizeof(expected) / sizeof(ElementResult));
+}
+
+TEST_F(AffectedByFocusTest, AffectedByFocusUpdate)
+{
+ // Check that when focussing the outer div in the document below, you only
+ // get a single element style recalc.
+
+ setHtmlInnerHTML("<style>:focus { border: 1px solid lime; }</style>"
+ "<div id=d tabIndex=1>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "</div>");
+
+ document().view()->updateLayoutAndStyleIfNeededRecursive();
+
+ unsigned startCount = document().styleEngine()->resolverAccessCount();
+
+ document().getElementById("d")->focus();
+ document().view()->updateLayoutAndStyleIfNeededRecursive();
+
+ unsigned accessCount = document().styleEngine()->resolverAccessCount() - startCount;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(1U, accessCount);
+}
+
+TEST_F(AffectedByFocusTest, ChildrenAffectedByFocusUpdate)
+{
+ // Check that when focussing the outer div in the document below, you get a
+ // style recalc for the whole subtree.
+
+ setHtmlInnerHTML("<style>:focus div { border: 1px solid lime; }</style>"
+ "<div id=d tabIndex=1>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "<div></div>"
+ "</div>");
+
+ document().view()->updateLayoutAndStyleIfNeededRecursive();
+
+ unsigned startCount = document().styleEngine()->resolverAccessCount();
+
+ document().getElementById("d")->focus();
+ document().view()->updateLayoutAndStyleIfNeededRecursive();
+
+ unsigned accessCount = document().styleEngine()->resolverAccessCount() - startCount;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(11U, accessCount);
+}
+
+} // namespace
« no previous file with comments | « Source/core/core.gypi ('k') | Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698