Adds support for CoreAudioUtil::IsChannelLayoutSupported() (II)

Adds support for CoreAudioUtil::IsChannelLayoutSupported().

Original patch (https://codereview.chromium.org/12918026/) was reverted.

TBR=tommi
BUG=177872
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=192046

[henrika (OOO until Aug 14), 2013-04-03 07:52:45]

Reason for reverting:

http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.win/buildstatus?builder=XP%20Tests%20%28...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-04-03 08:59:39]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/henrika@chromium.org/13515005/3001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-04-03 10:16:19]

Retried try job too often on win_rel for step(s) browser_tests
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/buildstatus?builder=win_rel&nu...

[henrika (OOO until Aug 14), 2013-04-03 10:54:53]

Committed patchset #2 manually as r192046 (presubmit successful).

[tommi (sloooow) - chröme, 2013-04-03 11:03:21]

lgtm

https://codereview.chromium.org/13515005/diff/3001/media/audio/win/core_audio...
File media/audio/win/core_audio_util_win.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/13515005/diff/3001/media/audio/win/core_audio...
media/audio/win/core_audio_util_win.cc:111: static std::ostream&
operator<<(std::ostream& os,
nit: if this is only used with DVLOGs then it would be nice to have this ifdefed
out in release builds.  As is, this will be included in production builds
because this sits in object file with production code.

[henrika (OOO until Aug 14), 2013-04-03 11:14:15]

https://codereview.chromium.org/13515005/diff/3001/media/audio/win/core_audio...
File media/audio/win/core_audio_util_win.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/13515005/diff/3001/media/audio/win/core_audio...
media/audio/win/core_audio_util_win.cc:111: static std::ostream&
operator<<(std::ostream& os,
Dale and I have "phased in" more logs from DVLOG to VLOG lately to be able to
debug easier in release build. Guess I was thinking in these terms here. IS it
OK to keep as is or do you want me to upload a new fix?

[tommi (sloooow) - chröme, 2013-04-03 11:16:54]

It's fine as is.  I meant this more as something to keep in mind for future
CLs since this has already been committed.


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:14 AM, <henrika@chromium.org> wrote:

>
> https://codereview.chromium.**org/13515005/diff/3001/media/**
>
audio/win/core_audio_util_win.**cc<https://codereview.chromium.org/13515005/diff/3001/media/audio/win/core_audio_util_win.cc>
> File media/audio/win/core_audio_**util_win.cc (right):
>
> https://codereview.chromium.**org/13515005/diff/3001/media/**
>
audio/win/core_audio_util_win.**cc#newcode111<https://codereview.chromium.org/13515005/diff/3001/media/audio/win/core_audio_util_win.cc#newcode111>
> media/audio/win/core_audio_**util_win.cc:111: static std::ostream&
> operator<<(std::ostream& os,
> Dale and I have "phased in" more logs from DVLOG to VLOG lately to be
> able to debug easier in release build. Guess I was thinking in these
> terms here. IS it OK to keep as is or do you want me to upload a new
> fix?
>
>
https://codereview.chromium.**org/13515005/<https://codereview.chromium.org/1...
>