Revert of Cross-repo recipe package system.

third_party/recipe_engine/expect_tests/unittest_helper.py

+# Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+# found in the LICENSE file.
+
+import unittest
+
+from .type_definitions import Test, Result, MultiTest, FuncCall, Bind
+
+
+def _SetUpClass(test_class):
+  inst = test_class('__init__')
+  inst.setUpClass()
+  return inst
+
+
+def _TearDownClass(test_class_inst):
+  test_class_inst.tearDownClass()
+
+
+def _RunTestCaseSingle(test_case, test_name, test_instance=None):
+  # The hack is so that unittest.TestCase has something to pretend is the
+  # test method without the BS of wrapping each method in a new TestCase
+  # class...
+  test_instance = test_instance or test_case('__init__')
+  test_instance.setUp()
+  try:
+    return Result(getattr(test_instance, test_name)())
+  finally:
+    test_instance.tearDown()
+
+
+def UnittestTestCase(test_case, name_prefix='', ext='json'):
+  """Yield a MultiTest or multiple Test instances for the unittest.TestCase
+  derived |test_case|.
+
+  If the TestCase has a field `__expect_tests_serial__` defined to be True, then
+  all test methods in the TestCase will be guaranteed to run in a single process
+  with the same instance. This is automatically set to True if your test class
+  relies on setUpClass/tearDownClass.
+
+  If the TestCase has a field `__expect_tests_atomic__` defined to be True, then
+  in the event of a test filter which matches any test method in |test_case|,
+  the ENTIRE |test_case| will be executed (i.e. the TestCase has interdependant
+  test methods). This should only need to be set for very poorly designed tests.
+
+  `__expect_tests_atomic__` implies `__expect_tests_serial__`.
+
+  @type test_case: unittest.TestCase
+  """
+  name_prefix = name_prefix + test_case.__name__
+  def _tests_from_class(cls, *args, **kwargs):
+    for test_name in unittest.defaultTestLoader.getTestCaseNames(cls):
+      yield Test(
+          name_prefix + '.' + test_name,
+          FuncCall(_RunTestCaseSingle, cls, test_name, *args, **kwargs),
+          ext=ext, break_funcs=[getattr(cls, test_name)],
+      )
+
+  if hasattr(test_case, '__expect_tests_serial__'):
+    serial = getattr(test_case, '__expect_tests_serial__', False)
+  else:
+    default_setup = unittest.TestCase.setUpClass.im_func
+    default_teardown = unittest.TestCase.tearDownClass.im_func
+    serial = (
+        test_case.setUpClass.im_func is not default_setup or
+        test_case.tearDownClass.im_func is not default_teardown)
+
+  atomic = getattr(test_case, '__expect_tests_atomic__', False)
+  if atomic or serial:
+    yield MultiTest(
+        name_prefix,
+        FuncCall(_SetUpClass, test_case),
+        FuncCall(_TearDownClass, Bind(name='context')),
+        list(_tests_from_class(test_case, test_instance=Bind(name='context'))),
+        atomic
+    )
+  else:
+    for test in _tests_from_class(test_case):
+      yield test
+
+
+def UnitTestModule(test_module, name_prefix='', ext='json'):
+  """Yield MultiTest's and/or Test's for the python module |test_module| which
+  contains zero or more unittest.TestCase implementations.
+
+  @type test_module: types.ModuleType
+  """
+  name_prefix = name_prefix + test_module.__name__ + '.'
+  for name in dir(test_module):
+    obj = getattr(test_module, name)
+    if isinstance(obj, type) and issubclass(obj, unittest.TestCase):
+      for test in UnittestTestCase(obj, name_prefix, ext):
+        yield test
+    # TODO(iannucci): Make this compatible with the awful load_tests hack?