OLD | NEW |
---|---|
(Empty) | |
1 <!DOCTYPE html> | |
2 | |
3 <html> | |
4 <head> | |
5 <style> | |
6 .container { | |
7 width: 200px; | |
8 height: 200px; | |
9 overflow: scroll; | |
10 margin: 20px; | |
11 border: 1px solid black; | |
12 background-color: #00FFFF; | |
13 } | |
14 | |
15 .scrolled { | |
16 width: 180px; | |
17 height: 30px; | |
18 margin: 10px; | |
19 top: 70px; | |
20 background-color: gray; | |
21 position: relative; | |
22 } | |
23 | |
24 .positioned { | |
25 width: 120px; | |
26 height: 240px; | |
27 position: absolute; | |
28 } | |
29 | |
30 #secondChild { | |
31 background-color: #CC9999; | |
32 top: 50px; | |
33 } | |
34 | |
35 #predecessor { | |
36 left: 20px; | |
37 top: 20px; | |
38 background-color: #990066; | |
39 } | |
40 | |
41 #successor { | |
42 left: 20px; | |
43 top: 20px; | |
44 background-color: #000066; | |
45 } | |
46 | |
47 #normalFlow { | |
48 width: 180px; | |
49 height: 30px; | |
50 margin: 10px; | |
51 top: -20px; | |
52 background-color: yellow; | |
Julien - ping for review
2013/04/24 15:44:01
Do we *really* need all this style? Ideally we sho
hartmanng
2013/04/24 17:02:41
I've taken out what I can, unfortunately a lot of
| |
53 } | |
54 </style> | |
55 <script src="resources/automatically-opt-into-composited-scrolling.js"></scrip t> | |
56 <script src="resources/build-paint-order-lists.js"></script> | |
57 <script> | |
58 function compareStackingOrderWithPaintOrder(stackingOrder, paintOrder) | |
59 { | |
60 if (debugMode) { | |
61 write("paint order:") | |
62 for (var i = 0; i < paintOrder.length; i++) | |
63 write(paintOrder[i].id + " " + paintOrder[i].className + " " + paintOr der[paintOrder.length - i - 1].tagName); | |
64 | |
65 write("stacking order:") | |
66 for (var i = 0; i < stackingOrder.length; i++) | |
67 write(stackingOrder[i].id + " " + stackingOrder[i].className + " " + s tackingOrder[i].tagName); | |
68 } | |
69 | |
70 if (stackingOrder.length < paintOrder.length) | |
71 return false; | |
72 | |
73 // We expect the stacking order list to contain more than the paint order | |
74 // list sometimes because after we promote, the container's children won't | |
75 // appear in the stacking context's ancestor's lists anymore (which is | |
76 // expected and correct). They'll still be in the stacking order list. | |
77 // The important part is that the order of the things present in the paint | |
78 // order list is preserved in the stacking order list. | |
79 for (var i = 0, j = 0; i < stackingOrder.length && j < paintOrder.length; i++) | |
80 if (stackingOrder[i] === paintOrder[paintOrder.length - j - 1]) | |
81 j++; | |
82 | |
83 if (debugMode) | |
84 write(stackingOrder.length + " " + i + " " + paintOrder.length + " " + j ); | |
85 | |
86 return j == paintOrder.length; | |
87 } | |
88 | |
89 function testPermutation(count) { | |
90 var container = document.getElementById('container'); | |
91 // Here we want to compare paint order lists before and after promotion | |
92 // to the actual stacking order as determined by hit-testing. So we | |
93 // first force the element not to promote, then compute its paint and | |
94 // stacking order lists. We then force the element to opt in, and | |
95 // generate the paint and stacking order lists after opt-in. | |
96 // | |
97 // The paint order lists should exactly match the stacking order lists | |
98 // (modulo children that fall outside of the hit-testing area | |
99 // on-screen), both before and after promotion. | |
100 container.style.webkitTransform = 'translateZ(0px)'; | |
101 document.body.offsetTop; | |
102 | |
103 window.internals.settings.setAcceleratedCompositingForOverflowScrollEnable d(false); | |
104 container.style.webkitTransform = ''; | |
105 | |
106 var oldStackingOrder = getStackingOrder(container); | |
107 var oldPaintOrder = getPaintOrder(container); | |
108 | |
109 window.internals.settings.setAcceleratedCompositingForOverflowScrollEnable d(true); | |
110 container.style.webkitTransform = 'translateZ(0px)'; | |
111 | |
112 var newStackingOrder = getStackingOrder(container); | |
113 var newPaintOrder = getPaintOrder(container); | |
114 | |
115 // The getPaintOrder() function should return a pair of paint orders. | |
116 // One before promotion and one after. This pair of lists should remain | |
117 // identical whether the element is actually currently promoted or not, | |
118 // its purpose is to generate hypothetical pre- and post-lists to | |
119 // determine if the element is promotable. | |
120 if (!comparePaintOrderLists(oldPaintOrder, newPaintOrder)) | |
121 write("iteration " + count + " FAIL - paint order lists not identical be fore/after promotion"); | |
122 | |
123 if (!compareStackingOrderWithPaintOrder(oldStackingOrder, oldPaintOrder.be forePromote)) | |
124 write("iteration " + count + " FAIL - paint order list before promote do esn't match stacking order"); | |
125 | |
126 if (!compareStackingOrderWithPaintOrder(newStackingOrder, oldPaintOrder.af terPromote)) | |
127 write("iteration " + count + " FAIL - paint order list after promote doe sn't match stacking order"); | |
128 | |
129 var containerOccurrences = countOccurrencesOfElementInPaintOrderList(oldPa intOrder.beforePromote, container); | |
130 if (containerOccurrences !== 1) | |
131 write("iteration " + count + " FAIL - paint order list before promote co ntains " + containerOccurrences + " occurrences of container. Should be exactly 1."); | |
132 | |
133 containerOccurrences = countOccurrencesOfElementInPaintOrderList(oldPaintO rder.afterPromote, container); | |
134 if (containerOccurrences !== 1) | |
135 write("iteration " + count + " FAIL - paint order list after promote con tains " + containerOccurrences + " occurrences of container. Should be exactly 1 ."); | |
136 } | |
137 | |
138 function doTest() | |
139 { | |
140 buildDom(); | |
141 permute(testPermutation); | |
142 } | |
143 | |
144 window.addEventListener('load', doTest, false); | |
145 </script> | |
146 </head> | |
147 | |
148 <body> | |
149 </body> | |
150 </html> | |
OLD | NEW |