Fixes for Angular

lib/src/checker/resolver.dart

 // Copyright (c) 2015, the Dart project authors.  Please see the AUTHORS file
 // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
 
 /// Encapsulates how to invoke the analyzer resolver and overrides how it
 /// computes types on expressions to use our restricted set of types.
 library dev_compiler.src.checker.resolver;
 
 import 'package:analyzer/analyzer.dart';
 import 'package:analyzer/src/generated/ast.dart';
@@ skipping 644 matching lines @@
       ];
     }
 
     var targetType = node.target?.staticType;
     var arguments = node.argumentList.arguments;
 
     for (var generic in _genericList) {
       if (e?.name == generic[1]) {
         if ((generic[0] is String &&
                 element?.library.source.uri.toString() == generic[0]) ||
-            (targetType == generic[0] ||
-                targetType != null && targetType.isSubtypeOf(generic[0]))) {
+            (generic[0] is DartType &&

[vsm, 2015/09/02 19:14:32]

We were accidentally calling isSubtypeOf with a String before. :-/

[Leaf, 2015/09/02 20:34:03]

youch.

+                targetType != null &&
+                targetType.isSubtypeOf(generic[0]))) {
           if (arguments.length == generic[2]) {
             return Function.apply(
                 generic[3], arguments.map((arg) => arg.staticType).toList());
           }
         }
       }
     }
 
     return null;
   }
@@ skipping 123 matching lines @@
     }
   }
 
   // Review note: no longer need to override visitFunctionExpression, this is
   // handled by the analyzer internally.
   // TODO(vsm): in visitbinaryExpression: check computeStaticReturnType result?
   // TODO(vsm): in visitFunctionDeclaration: Should we ever use the expression
   // type in a (...) => expr or just the written type?
 
 }