[Docs] Another round of stylistic fixes.

docs/gtk_vs_views_gtk.md

Index: docs/gtk_vs_views_gtk.md
diff --git a/docs/gtk_vs_views_gtk.md b/docs/gtk_vs_views_gtk.md
index df723411d30a79d7976b04809242704f984d6f7c..4af77e1002248a62fee4656d75b8793495a2a7d1 100644
--- a/docs/gtk_vs_views_gtk.md
+++ b/docs/gtk_vs_views_gtk.md
@@ -1,27 +1,38 @@
-# Benefits of ViewsGtk
+# Gtk vs ViewsGtk
 
-  * Better code sharing. For example, don't have to duplicate tab layout or bookmark bar layout code.
-    * Tab Strip
-      * Drawing
-      * All the animationy bits
-      * Subtle click selection behavior (curved corners)
-      * Drag behavior, including dropping of files onto the URL bar
-      * Closing behavior
-    * Bookmarks bar
-      * drag & drop behavior, including menus
-      * chevron?
-  * Easier for folks to work on both platforms without knowing much about the underlying toolkits.
-  * Don't have to implement ui features twice.
+## Benefits of ViewsGtk
 
+*   Better code sharing. For example, don't have to duplicate tab layout or
+    bookmark bar layout code.
+    *   Tab Strip
+        *   Drawing
+        *   All the animationy bits
+        *   Subtle click selection behavior (curved corners)
+        *   Drag behavior, including dropping of files onto the URL bar
+        *   Closing behavior
+    *   Bookmarks bar
+        *   drag & drop behavior, including menus
+        *   chevron?
+*   Easier for folks to work on both platforms without knowing much about the
+    underlying toolkits.
+*   Don't have to implement ui features twice.
 
-# Benefits of Gtk
-  * Dialogs
-    * Native feel layout
-    * Font size changes (e.g., changing the system font size will apply to our dialogs)
-    * Better RTL (e.g., http://crbug.com/2822 http://crbug.com/5729 http://crbug.com/6082 http://crbug.com/6103 http://crbug.com/6125 http://crbug.com/8686 http://crbug.com/8649 )
-  * Being able to obey the user's system theme
-  * Accessibility for buttons and dialogs (but not for tabstrip and bookmarks)
-  * A better change at good remote X performance?
-  * We still would currently need Pango / Cairo for text layout, so it will be more efficient to just draw that during the Gtk pipeline instead of with Skia.
-  * Gtk widgets will automatically "feel and behave" like Linux.  The behavior of our own Views system does not necessarily feel right on Linux.
-  * People working on Windows features don't need to worry about breaking the Linux build.
+## Benefits of Gtk
+
+*   Dialogs
+    *   Native feel layout
+    *   Font size changes (e.g., changing the system font size will apply to our
+        dialogs)
+    *   Better RTL (e.g., http://crbug.com/2822 http://crbug.com/5729
+        http://crbug.com/6082 http://crbug.com/6103 http://crbug.com/6125
+        http://crbug.com/8686 http://crbug.com/8649)
+*   Being able to obey the user's system theme
+*   Accessibility for buttons and dialogs (but not for tabstrip and bookmarks)
+*   A better change at good remote X performance?
+*   We still would currently need Pango / Cairo for text layout, so it will be
+    more efficient to just draw that during the Gtk pipeline instead of with
+    Skia.
+*   Gtk widgets will automatically "feel and behave" like Linux. The behavior of
+    our own Views system does not necessarily feel right on Linux.
+*   People working on Windows features don't need to worry about breaking the
+    Linux build.