[Docs] Another round of stylistic fixes.

docs/piranha_plant.md

-# Introduction
+# Piranha Plant
 
-Piranha Plant is the name of a project, started in November 2013, that aims to deliver the future architecture of MediaStreams in Chromium.
+Piranha Plant is the name of a project, started in November 2013, that aims to
+deliver the future architecture of MediaStreams in Chromium.
 
-Project members are listed in the [group for the project](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!members/piranha-plant).
+Project members are listed in the
+[group for the project](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!members/piranha-plant).
 
-The Piranha Plant is a monster plant that has appeared in many of the Super Mario games. In the original Super Mario Bros, it hid in the green pipes and is thus an apt name for the project as we are fighting "monsters in the plumbing."
+The Piranha Plant is a monster plant that has appeared in many of the Super
+Mario games. In the original Super Mario Bros, it hid in the green pipes and is
+thus an apt name for the project as we are fighting "monsters in the plumbing."
 
 ![http://files.hypervisor.fr/img/super_mario_piranha_plant.png](http://files.hypervisor.fr/img/super_mario_piranha_plant.png)
 
-# Background
+[TOC]
 
-When the MediaStream spec initially came to be, it was tightly coupled with PeerConnection. The infrastructure for both of these was initially implemented primarily in libjingle, and then used by Chromium. For this reason, the MediaStream implementation in Chromium is still somewhat coupled with the PeerConnection implementation, it still uses some libjingle interfaces on the Chromium side, and progress is sometimes more difficult as changes need to land in libjingle before changes can be made in Chromium.
+## Background
 
-Since the early days, the MediaStream spec has evolved so that PeerConnection is just one destination for a MediaStream, multiple teams are or will be consuming the MediaStream infrastructure, and we have a clearer vision of what the architecture should look like now that the spec is relatively stable.
+When the MediaStream spec initially came to be, it was tightly coupled with
+PeerConnection. The infrastructure for both of these was initially implemented
+primarily in libjingle, and then used by Chromium. For this reason, the
+MediaStream implementation in Chromium is still somewhat coupled with the
+PeerConnection implementation, it still uses some libjingle interfaces on the
+Chromium side, and progress is sometimes more difficult as changes need to land
+in libjingle before changes can be made in Chromium.
 
-# Goals
-  1. Document the idealized future design for MediaStreams in Chromium (MS) as well as the current state.
-  1. Create and execute on a plan to incrementally implement the future design.
-  1. Improve quality, maintainability and readability/understandability of the MS code.
-  1. Make life easier for Chromium developers using MS.
-  1. Balance concerns and priorities of the different teams that are or will be using MS in Chromium.
-  1. Do the above without hurting our ability to produce the WebRTC.org deliverables, and without hurting interoperability between Chromium and other software built on the WebRTC.org deliverables.
+Since the early days, the MediaStream spec has evolved so that PeerConnection is
+just one destination for a MediaStream, multiple teams are or will be consuming
+the MediaStream infrastructure, and we have a clearer vision of what the
+architecture should look like now that the spec is relatively stable.
 
-# Deliverables
+## Goals
 
-  1. Project code name: Piranha Plant.
-  1. A [design document](http://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/idealized-mediastream-design) for the idealized future design (work in progress).
-  1. A document laying out a plan for incremental steps to achieve as much of the idealized design as is pragmatic. See below for current draft.
-  1. A [master bug](http://crbug.com/323223) to collect all existing and currently planned work items:
-  1. Sub-bugs of the master bug, for all currently known and planned work.
-  1. A document describing changed and improved team policies to help us keep improving code quality (e.g. naming, improved directory structure, OWNERS files). Not started.
+1.  Document the idealized future design for MediaStreams in Chromium (MS) as
+    well as the current state.
+1.  Create and execute on a plan to incrementally implement the future design.
+1.  Improve quality, maintainability and readability/understandability of the MS
+    code.
+1.  Make life easier for Chromium developers using MS.
+1.  Balance concerns and priorities of the different teams that are or will be
+    using MS in Chromium.
+1.  Do the above without hurting our ability to produce the WebRTC.org
+    deliverables, and without hurting interoperability between Chromium and
+    other software built on the WebRTC.org deliverables.
 
-# Task List
-Here are some upcoming tasks we need to work on to progress towards the idealized design. Those currently being worked on have emails at the front:
-  * General
-    * More restrictive OWNERS
-    * DEPS files to limit dependencies on libjingle
-    * Rename MediaStream{Manager, Dispatcher, DispatcherHandler} to CaptureDevice{...} since it is a bit confusing to use the MediaStream name here.
-    * Rename MediaStreamDependencyFactory to PeerConnectionDependencyFactory.
-    * Split up MediaStreamImpl.
-    * Change the RTCPeerConnectionHandler to only create the PeerConnection and related stuff when necessary.
-  * Audio
-    * [xians](xians.md) Add a Content API where given an audio WebMediaStreamTrack, you can register as a sink for that track.
-    * Move RendererMedia, the current local audio track sink interface, to //media and change as necessary.
-    * Put a Chrome-side adapter on the libjingle audio track interface.
-    * Move the APM from libjingle to Chrome, putting it behind an experimental flag to start with.
-    * Do format change notifications on the capture thread.
-    * Switch to a push model for received PeerConnection audio.
-  * Video
-    * [perkj](perkj.md) Add a Chrome-side interface representing a sink for a video track.
-    * [perkj](perkj.md) Add a Content API where given a video WebMediaStreamTrack, you can register as a sink for that track.
-    * Add a Chrome-side adapter for libjingle’s video track interface, which may also need to change.
-    * Implement a Chrome-side VideoSource and constraints handling (currently in libjingle).
+## Deliverables
+
+1.  Project code name: Piranha Plant.
+1.  A [design document](http://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/idealized-mediastream-design)
+    for the idealized future design (work in progress).
+1.  A document laying out a plan for incremental steps to achieve as much of the
+    idealized design as is pragmatic. See below for current draft.
+1.  A [master bug](https://crbug.com/323223) to collect all existing and
+    currently planned work items:
+1.  Sub-bugs of the master bug, for all currently known and planned work.
+1.  A document describing changed and improved team policies to help us keep
+    improving code quality (e.g. naming, improved directory structure, OWNERS
+    files). Not started.
+
+## Task List
+
+Here are some upcoming tasks we need to work on to progress towards the
+idealized design. Those currently being worked on have emails at the front:
+
+*   General
+    *   More restrictive OWNERS
+    *   DEPS files to limit dependencies on libjingle
+    *   Rename MediaStream{Manager, Dispatcher, DispatcherHandler} to
+        CaptureDevice{...} since it is a bit confusing to use the MediaStream
+        name here.
+    *   Rename MediaStreamDependencyFactory to PeerConnectionDependencyFactory.
+    *   Split up MediaStreamImpl.
+    *   Change the RTCPeerConnectionHandler to only create the PeerConnection
+        and related stuff when necessary.
+*   Audio
+    *   [xians] Add a Content API where given an audio WebMediaStreamTrack, you
+        can register as a sink for that track.
+    *   Move RendererMedia, the current local audio track sink interface, to
+        //media and change as necessary.
+    *   Put a Chrome-side adapter on the libjingle audio track interface.
+    *   Move the APM from libjingle to Chrome, putting it behind an experimental
+        flag to start with.
+    *   Do format change notifications on the capture thread.
+    *   Switch to a push model for received PeerConnection audio.
+*   Video
+    *   [perkj] Add a Chrome-side interface representing a sink for a video
+        track.
+    *   [perkj] Add a Content API where given a video WebMediaStreamTrack, you
+        can register as a sink for that track.
+    *   Add a Chrome-side adapter for libjingle’s video track interface, which
+        may also need to change.
+    *   Implement a Chrome-side VideoSource and constraints handling (currently
+        in libjingle).