Rename media/base/bind_to_loop.h to media/base/bind_to_current_loop.h.

Rename media/base/bind_to_loop.h to media/base/bind_to_current_loop.h.

BUG=167240
R=xhwang@chromium.org
TBR=jam

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=244099

[scherkus (not reviewing), 2014-01-09 23:56:37]

xhwang: you get this one :)

[xhwang, 2014-01-10 00:30:28]

lgtm % one question

https://codereview.chromium.org/132163006/diff/1/media/base/bind_to_current_l...
File media/base/bind_to_current_loop_unittest.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/132163006/diff/1/media/base/bind_to_current_l...
media/base/bind_to_current_loop_unittest.cc:49: &base::WaitableEvent::Signal,
base::Unretained(&waiter)));
nit: How do we make sure it's "signal"ed on the "current" loop?

[scherkus (not reviewing), 2014-01-10 01:09:18]

https://codereview.chromium.org/132163006/diff/1/media/base/bind_to_current_l...
File media/base/bind_to_current_loop_unittest.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/132163006/diff/1/media/base/bind_to_current_l...
media/base/bind_to_current_loop_unittest.cc:49: &base::WaitableEvent::Signal,
base::Unretained(&waiter)));
On 2014/01/10 00:30:29, xhwang wrote:
> nit: How do we make sure it's "signal"ed on the "current" loop?

I don't believe we're testing for the current-ness, but rather just that it did
get signaled only after the loop has been run.

[xhwang, 2014-01-10 01:13:10]

On 2014/01/10 01:09:18, scherkus wrote:
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/132163006/diff/1/media/base/bind_to_current_l...
> File media/base/bind_to_current_loop_unittest.cc (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/132163006/diff/1/media/base/bind_to_current_l...
> media/base/bind_to_current_loop_unittest.cc:49: &base::WaitableEvent::Signal,
> base::Unretained(&waiter)));
> On 2014/01/10 00:30:29, xhwang wrote:
> > nit: How do we make sure it's "signal"ed on the "current" loop?
> 
> I don't believe we're testing for the current-ness, but rather just that it
did
> get signaled only after the loop has been run.

Sure. Still lgtm!

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-01-10 01:24:39]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/scherkus@chromium.org/132163006/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-01-10 04:59:26]

Retried try job too often on win_rel for step(s) browser_tests
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/buildstatus?builder=win_rel&nu...

[scherkus (not reviewing), 2014-01-10 05:15:59]

Committed patchset #1 manually as r244099.