Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(4)

Unified Diff: test/codegen/language/conditional_method_invocation_test.dart

Issue 1316723003: implement null aware ops, fixes #249 (Closed) Base URL: git@github.com:dart-lang/dev_compiler.git@master
Patch Set: Created 5 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: test/codegen/language/conditional_method_invocation_test.dart
diff --git a/test/codegen/language/conditional_method_invocation_test.dart b/test/codegen/language/conditional_method_invocation_test.dart
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0dd219deea717962cecca65d4c22ff91b6505aef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/codegen/language/conditional_method_invocation_test.dart
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2015, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
+// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
+// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+// Verify semantics of the ?. operator when it is used to invoke a method.
+
+import "package:expect/expect.dart";
+import "conditional_access_helper.dart" as h;
+
+bad() {
+ Expect.fail('Should not be executed');
+}
+
+noMethod(e) => e is NoSuchMethodError;
+
+class B {}
+
+class C extends B {
+ f(callback()) => callback();
+ int g(int callback()) => callback();
+ static staticF(callback()) => callback();
+ static int staticG(int callback()) => callback();
+}
+
+C nullC() => null;
+
+main() {
+ // Make sure the "none" test fails if method invocation using "?." is not
+ // implemented. This makes status files easier to maintain.
+ nullC()?.f(null);
+
+ // o?.m(...) is equivalent to ((x) => x == null ? null : x.m(...))(o).
+ Expect.equals(null, nullC()?.f(bad())); /// 01: ok
+ Expect.equals(1, new C()?.f(() => 1)); /// 02: ok
+
+ // C?.m(...) is equivalent to C.m(...).
+ Expect.equals(1, C?.staticF(() => 1)); /// 14: ok
+ Expect.equals(1, h.C?.staticF(() => 1)); /// 15: ok
+
+ // The static type of o?.m(...) is the same as the static type of
+ // o.m(...).
+ { int i = nullC()?.g(bad()); Expect.equals(null, i); } /// 03: ok
+ { int i = new C()?.g(() => 1); Expect.equals(1, i); } /// 04: ok
+ { String s = nullC()?.g(bad()); Expect.equals(null, s); } /// 05: static type warning
+ { String s = new C()?.g(() => null); Expect.equals(null, s); } /// 06: static type warning
+ { int i = C?.staticG(() => 1); Expect.equals(1, i); } /// 16: ok
+ { int i = h.C?.staticG(() => 1); Expect.equals(1, i); } /// 17: ok
+ { String s = C?.staticG(() => null); Expect.equals(null, s); } /// 18: static type warning
+ { String s = h.C?.staticG(() => null); Expect.equals(null, s); } /// 19: static type warning
+
+ // Let T be the static type of o and let y be a fresh variable of type T.
+ // Exactly the same static warnings that would be caused by y.m(...) are also
+ // generated in the case of o?.m(...).
+ { B b = new C(); Expect.equals(1, b?.f(() => 1)); } /// 07: static type warning
+ { int i = 1; Expect.equals(null, nullC()?.f(i)); } /// 08: static type warning
+
+ // '?.' can't be used to access toplevel functions in libraries imported via
+ // prefix.
+ h?.topLevelFunction(); /// 11: compile-time error
+
+ // Nor can it be used to access the toString method on the class Type.
+ Expect.throws(() => C?.toString(), noMethod); /// 12: static type warning
+ Expect.throws(() => h.C?.toString(), noMethod); /// 13: static type warning
+}
« no previous file with comments | « test/codegen/language/conditional_access_helper.dart ('k') | test/codegen/language/conditional_property_access_test.dart » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698